Title:
All Options on the Table

No Thumbnail Available
Author(s)
Kroenig, Matthew
Authors
Advisor(s)
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Associated Organization(s)
Series
Collections
Supplementary to
Abstract
Matthew Kroenig discusses the security implications of a nuclear-armed Iran. While making it clear that he does not advocate war, he claims that all signs point to the Islamic Republic’s interest in the bomb and that time is rapidly elapsing for an effective negotiated or even credible preemptive strike. He argues that on balance the “costs” and challenges of a preemptive strike would prove to be less than those associated with attempting to contain a nuclear armed Iran. The latter scenario, for example, would further destabilize the Middle East, encourage arms racing, and significantly increase the odds of a regional nuclear conflict. Given these high stakes, Kroenig advocates that U.S. policymakers keep the option of preemptive military strike against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure on the table.
Sponsor
Date Issued
2014-10-20
Extent
68:55 minutes
Resource Type
Moving Image
Resource Subtype
Lecture
Rights Statement
Rights URI