Title:
Self-Regulation, Compensation, and the Ethical Recruitment of Oocyte Donors

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author Levine, Aaron D. en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Public Policy en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-17T18:16:17Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-17T18:16:17Z
dc.date.issued 2009-10-02 en_US
dc.description Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2009 en_US
dc.description This presentation was part of the session : Policy Actors and Relationships en_US
dc.description.abstract Although oocyte donation is an increasingly important component of fertility treatment in the United States, few regulations address this ethically-contentious practice. Rather, oversight relies on self-regulation in the form of ethics guidelines published by professional organizations. Among other topics, these guidelines include limits on the appropriate compensation for oocyte donors. Specifically, the Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine has written that "at this time sums of $5,000 or more require justification and sums above $10,000 are not appropriate." Furthermore, they indicate that compensation should be for the lost time and inconvenience of the donation process and, accordingly not vary with the characteristics of the individual donor. This research aims to test compliance with these guidelines. To do so, it reports the analysis of a novel dataset of oocyte donor recruitment advertisements found in student newspapers. Nearly half of the advertisements offered compensation that the ethical guidelines deem "inappropriate" or "requiring justification." Regression techniques are used to explore the factors that explain differences in the amount of compensation offered to potential oocyte donors. This analysis finds that for advertisements placed by donor agencies or individual couples, the average SAT score of students at schools where the advertisements were placed was an important predictor of compensation, suggesting that donor personal characteristics are influencing compensation. Varying compensation in this manner would be another violation of the ethical guidelines. Further research will explore the effects of regional competition on the amount of compensation offered to potential oocyte donors. These results highlight the challenges associated with relying on self-regulation to ensure oocyte donors are recruited and compensated in an ethical manner and raise questions about the effectiveness of self-regulation as a means to ensure compliance with ethics guidelines. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/32271
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ACSIP09. Policy Actors and Relationships en_US
dc.subject Fertility treatment
dc.subject Oocyte donors
dc.subject Compensation
dc.subject Ethics
dc.title Self-Regulation, Compensation, and the Ethical Recruitment of Oocyte Donors en_US
dc.type Text
dc.type.genre Proceedings
dspace.entity.type Publication
local.contributor.author Levine, Aaron D.
local.contributor.corporatename Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts
local.contributor.corporatename School of Public Policy
local.relation.ispartofseries Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0978e86c-0a0e-424c-8858-0e2ec51d088b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b1049ff1-5166-442c-9e14-ad804b064e38
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a3789037-aec2-41bb-9888-1a95104b7f8c
relation.isSeriesOfPublication 8e93dc09-10dd-4fdd-8c5a-77defb1f7f78
Files
Collections
Scholarly Events