Organizational Unit:
Space Systems Design Laboratory (SSDL)
Space Systems Design Laboratory (SSDL)
Permanent Link
Research Organization Registry ID
Description
Previous Names
Parent Organization
Parent Organization
Organizational Unit
Includes Organization(s)
ArchiveSpace Name Record
Publication Search Results
Now showing
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemTempest: Crew Exploration Vehicle Concept(Georgia Institute of Technology, 2005-07) Hutchinson, Virgil L., Jr. ; Olds, John R. ; Alemany, Kristina ; Christian, John A., III ; Clark, Ian G. ; Crowley, John ; Krevor, Zachary C. ; Rohrschneider, Reuben R. ; Thompson, Robert W. ; Young, David Anthony ; Young, James J.Tempest is a reusable crew exploration vehicle (CEV) for transferring crew from the Earth to the lunar surface and back. Tempest serves as a crew transfer module that supports a 4-person crew for a mission duration of 18 days, which consists of 8 days total transit duration and 10-day surface duration. Primary electrical power generation and on-orbit maneuvering for Tempest is provided by an attached Power and Propulsion Module (PPM). Hydrogen (H2)/oxygen (O2) fuel cells and a high energy-density matter (HEDM)/liquid oxygen (LOX) propellant reaction control system (RCS) provide power and reaction control respectively during Tempest’s separation from the PPM. Tempest is designed for a lifting entry and is equipped with parachutes for a soft landing. Tempest is part of an overall lunar transportation architecture. The 60,731 lbs combination of Tempest and the PPM are launched atop the notional Centurion C-1 heavylift launch vehicle (HLLV) and delivered to a 162 nmi, 28.5º circular orbit. After separating from the C-1 upper stage, the Tempest/PPM autonomously rendezvous with Manticore, an expendable trans-lunar injection (TLI) stage pre-positioned in the current orbit, and transfer to a lunar trajectory. After entering a 54 nmi polar circular lunar orbit, the Tempest/PPM separate from Manticore. Tempest separates from the PPM and is ferried to/from the lunar surface by Artemis, a reusable lunar lander. Upon return from the lunar surface, Tempest reconnects with the PPM, and the PPM provides the trans-earth injection (TEI) burn required to return to low earth orbit (LEO). Prior to atmospheric entry, Tempest separates from the PPM and subsequently executes a lifting entry trajectory. Crushable thermal foam attached to the lower surface of Tempest serves as an ablative thermal protection system (TPS) and the impact absorber of the parachute landing. Details of the conceptual design process used for Tempest are included in this paper. The disciplines used in the design include: configuration, aerodynamics, propulsion, trajectory, mass properties, environmental control life support system (ECLSS), entry aeroheating and TPS, terminal landing system (TLS), cost, operations, and reliability & safety. Each of these disciplines was computed using a conceptual design tool similar to that used in industry. These disciplines were then combined and optimized for the minimum gross weight of the Tempest CEV. The total development cost including the design, development, testing and evaluation (DDT&E) cost was determined to be $2.9 B FY’04. The theoretical first unit (TFU) cost for the Tempest CEV was $479 M FY’04. A summary of design disciplines as well as the economic results are included.
-
ItemArtemis: A Reusable Excursion Vehicle Concept for Lunar Exploration(Georgia Institute of Technology, 2005-07) Young, David Anthony ; Olds, John R. ; Hutchinson, Virgil L., Jr. ; Krevor, Zachary C. ; Young, James J.Artemis is a reusable excursion vehicle for lunar landing missions. It is intended to transport a notional CEV vehicle from low lunar orbit (LLO) to the lunar surface. It can be reused by refueling the vehicle in LLO. Artemis is nominally sized to carry a 10 MT payload to the lunar surface and then return it to LLO. Artemis is powered by four liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen fueled RL-10 engines. These RL-10 engines provide the necessary thrust and allow the Artemis lander to complete its nominal mission with two engines inoperative. The Artemis lander has volume margin built into its propellant tanks. This volume margin combined with an innovative cross-feed system allows Artemis to complete its ascent from the lunar surface with a propellant tank failure. This cross-feed system also allows Artemis to adjust the center of gravity (cg) of the vehicle by transferring propellant among the propellant tanks. Artemis lands on the moon with six articulating legs. This provides redundancy against a leg failure on landing and provides Artemis with the ability to land on uneven terrain. This vehicle is designed to be launched by a heavy-lift evolved expendable launch vehicle (EELV). This design constraint results in the distinct shape of the lander. Artemis is launched as a compact cylinder in the EELV payload shroud, and then autonomously assembles itself via robotic arms similar to those currently used by the shuttle program. Details of the conceptual design process used for Artemis are included in this paper. The disciplines used in the design include configuration, propulsion design and selection, trajectory, mass properties, structural design, cost, operations, and reliability and safety. Each of these disciplines was computed using a conceptual design tool similar to that used in industry. These disciplines were then combined into an integrated design team process and used to minimize the gross weight of the Artemis. Once the design process was completed, a parametric Excel based model was created from the point design. This model can be used to resize Artemis for changing system metrics (such as payload) as well as changing technologies. The Artemis recurring and non-recurring costs were also computed. The total development cost including the design, development, testing and evaluation (DDT&E) cost is $2.17 B FY'04. The theoretical first unit (TFU) cost is $303 M FY'04. Trade studies on life cycle costs (LCC) vs. fuel cost to LLO as well as flight rate are also discussed. A summary of design disciplines as well as the economic results are included.
-
ItemCenturion: A Heavy-Lift Launch Vehicle Family for Cis-Lunar Exploration(Georgia Institute of Technology, 2004-07) Young, David Anthony ; Olds, John R. ; Hutchinson, Virgil L., Jr. ; Krevor, Zachary C. ; Pimentel, Janssen ; Reeves, John Daniel ; Sakai, Tadashi ; Young, James J.Centurion is an expendable heavy lift launch vehicle (HLLV) family for launching lunar exploration missions. Each vehicle in the family is built around a common two-stage core. The first stage of the core uses kerosene (RP-1) fuel and utilizes four staged-combustion RD-180 rocket engines. The upper stages consist of liquid oxygen (LOX)/liquid hydrogen (LH2) propellant with three 220,000 lb thrust-class expander rocket engines. The larger variants in the Centurion family will also use either one or two pairs of five-segment solid rocket motors which are now being developed by ATK Thiokol. The Centurion family consists of three vehicles denoted as C-1, C-2, and C-3. The first vehicle (C-1) is a four RD-180 core with a LOX/LH2 upper stage. The C-1 is designed to deliver a 35 metric ton (MT) CEV to a 300 km x 1000 km highly elliptical orbit (HEO). This HEO allows the CEV to more easily transfer to a lunar trajectory, while still having the ability to abort after one revolution. The C-1 also is designed to meet mission requirements with a failure of both one RD-180 and one upper stage engine. The C-2 and C-3 Centurions are both cargo carrying variants which carry 100 MT and 142 MT of cargo to a 407 km low earth orbit (LEO) respectively. The C-2 utilizes two five-segment solid rocket boosters (SRB), while the C-3 uses four SRBs. Details of the conceptual design process used for Centurion are included in this paper. The disciplines used in the design include configuration, aerodynamics, propulsion design and selection, trajectory, mass properties, structural design, aeroheating and thermal protection systems (TPS), cost, operations, and reliability and safety. Each of these disciplines was computed using a conceptual design tool similar to that used in industry. These disciplines were then combined into an integrated design team process and used to minimize the gross weight of the C-1 variant. The C-2 and C-3 variants were simulated using the C-1 optimized core with different configurations of SRBs. Each of the variants recurring and non-recurring costs were computed. The total development cost including the design, development, testing and evaluation (DDT&E) cost and a new launch pad at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), was 7.98 B FY04 dollars. The theoretical first unit (TFU) cost for the C-2 variant was 532 M FY04 dollars. A summary of design disciplines as well as the economic results are included.