Title:
Life Cycle Comparison of Two RO Concentrate Reduction Technologies

dc.contributor.author Wan, Jing en_US
dc.contributor.author Gattie, David en_US
dc.contributor.author Hester, Nathan en_US
dc.contributor.author Jambeck, Jenna en_US
dc.contributor.author Li, Ke en_US
dc.contributor.author Schramski, John en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename University of Georgia. College of Engineering en_US
dc.contributor.editor Carroll, G. Denise en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-02-25T21:09:19Z
dc.date.available 2013-02-25T21:09:19Z
dc.date.issued 2011-04
dc.description Proceedings of the 2011 Georgia Water Resources Conference, April 11, 12, and 13, 2011, Athens, Georgia. en_US
dc.description.abstract Desalination and water reuse technologies are critical for solving water problems. Unlocking water resources through the minimization of reverse osmosis (RO) concentrate volume offers sustainable opportunities to meet the challenge. A pellet softening lime intermediate concentrate chemical stabilization (ICCS) reactor and a conventional lime softening ICCS for the treatment of RO concentrate were evaluated. Process performance, footprint, chemical usage, energy consumption, residual volume and dewatering characteristics for the conventional and pellet softening ICCS were compared. To evaluate the overall environmental impact of the two ICCS, a process based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed for the conventional and pellet softening ICCS technologies. The LCA quantifies the resource and energy needs and wastes generation through the process’ life from raw material acquisition to production, use, and disposal. It is based on careful energy and materials balances for all stages. The LCA factored resource inputs (minerals, fossil fuels, land use, etc.) and environmental outputs (damage to natural resources, ecosystem quality and human health, air emissions, toxicityweighting, global warming potential, ozone depletion potential, eutrophication potential, etc.). This paper will present a comprehensive comparison of the two ICCS technologies including pilot testing results and LCA. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sponsored by: Georgia Environmental Protection Division U.S. Geological Survey, Georgia Water Science Center U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia Water Resources Institute The University of Georgia, Water Resources Faculty en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility This book was published by Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2152. The views and statements advanced in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not represent official views or policies of The University of Georgia, the U.S. Geological Survey, the Georgia Water Research Institute as authorized by the Water Research Institutes Authorization Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-307) or the other conference sponsors. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 0-9794100-24
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/46247
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.publisher.original Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries GWRI2011. Environmental Protection en_US
dc.subject Water resources management en_US
dc.subject Reverse osmosis en_US
dc.subject Life cycle assessment en_US
dc.subject Intermediate concentrate chemical stabilization en_US
dc.title Life Cycle Comparison of Two RO Concentrate Reduction Technologies en_US
dc.type Text
dc.type.genre Proceedings
dspace.entity.type Publication
local.contributor.corporatename Georgia Water Resources Institute
local.contributor.corporatename School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
local.contributor.corporatename College of Engineering
local.relation.ispartofseries Georgia Water Resources Conference
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8873b408-9aff-48cc-ae3c-a3d1daf89a98
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 88639fad-d3ae-4867-9e7a-7c9e6d2ecc7c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 7c022d60-21d5-497c-b552-95e489a06569
relation.isSeriesOfPublication e0bfffc9-c85a-4095-b626-c25ee130a2f3
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6.5.1Wan.pdf
Size:
137.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: