Entry System Options for Human Return from the Moon and Mars

Thumbnail Image
Files
PutnamAIAA-2005-5915.pdf (359.79 KB)
Author(s)
Putnam, Zachary R.
Braun, Robert D.
Rohrschneider, Reuben R.
Dec, John A.
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering
The Daniel Guggenheim School of Aeronautics was established in 1931, with a name change in 1962 to the School of Aerospace Engineering
Series
Collections
Research Publications
Supplementary to:
Permanent Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1853/8434
Abstract
Earth entry system options for human return missions from the Moon and Mars were analyzed and compared to identify trends among the configurations and trajectory options and to facilitate informed decision making at the exploration architecture level. Entry system options included ballistic, lifting capsule, biconic, and lifting body configurations with direct entry and aerocapture trajectories. For each configuration and trajectory option, the thermal environment, deceleration environment, crossrange and downrange performance, and entry corridor were assessed. In addition, the feasibility of a common vehicle for lunar and Mars return was investigated. The results show that a low lift-to-drag ratio (L/D = 0.3) vehicle provides sufficient performance for both lunar and Mars return missions while providing the following benefits: excellent packaging efficiency, low structural and TPS mass fraction, ease of launch vehicle integration, and system elegance and simplicity. Numerous configuration options exist that achieve this L/D.
Sponsor
Date
2005-08
Extent
368428 bytes
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Paper
Rights Statement
Rights URI