Person:
Rogers, Juan D.

Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
ORCID
ArchiveSpace Name Record

Publication Search Results

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
  • Item
    Assessment of Fifteen Nanotechnology Science and Engineering Centers’ (NSECs) Outcomes and Impacts: Their contribution to NNI Objectives and Goals
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011-09-17) Kay, Luciano ; Rogers, Juan D. ; Youtie, Jan L.
    US Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers (NSECs) were created to foster world-class science, commercialization, education, and responsible governance. Our evaluation of the NSEC program suggests that the NSECs have demonstrated strategic flexibility in evolving as the field has evolved, addressing multiple goals, influencing their host universities, and reorienting resources around key early career investigators.
  • Item
    A New Technology Transfer Scheme for the Periphery: The case of INTA in Argentina
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011-09-15) Arnozis, Patricia Adriana ; Rogers, Juan D.
    Argentina faces many productive problems that would benefit from scientific and technological contributions for their solution. INTA, a public R&D agricultural agency, has worked hard in solving them. In this paper, we will present a case study of a particular arrangement designed to accelerate technological transference to the productive sector.
  • Item
    Assessment of fifteen nanotechnology science and engineering centers? (NSECs) Outcomes and impacts: their contribution to NNI objectives and goals
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011-03-31) Rogers, Juan D. ; Youtie, Jan L. ; Porter, Alan L. ; Shapira, Philip
  • Item
    MOD measurement and analysis of highly creative research in the US and Europe
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011-02-04) Shapira, Philip ; Rogers, Juan D. ; Youtie, Jan
  • Item
    The CREA Project – Measuring and Analyzing Highly Creative Scientific Research
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011-01-24) Shapira, Philip ; Youtie, Jan L. ; Rogers, Juan D. ; Heinze, Thomas
    This project investigates the features of the research environment that enable and foster highly creative research in nanotechnology and human genetics in the US and Europe. It also examines the influence of career patterns. The study contributes to the methodology of science studies by further developing and extending curriculum vita (CV) analysis. The identification of factors in the research environment has broader implications for research and human resource management, and the design and implementation of funding schemes. The use of comparative fields extends the range of impact to two different emerging fields. Public datasets containing variables related to the creative researcher nominees is made available for use by others.
  • Item
    Development of evaluation tools for assessing capabilities in health technology
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010-09-29) Rogers, Juan D.
  • Item
    Blind Matching Versus Matchmaking: Comparison Group Selection for Highly Creative Researchers
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009-10) Rogers, Juan D. ; Shapira, Philip ; Youtie, Jan L.
    This research examines approaches for constructing a comparison group relative to highly creative researchers in nanotechnology and human genetics in the US and Europe. Such a comparison group would be useful in identifying factors that contribute to scientific creativity in these emerging fields. Two comparison group development approaches are investigated. The first approach is based on propensity score analysis and the second is based on knowledge from the literature on scientific creativity and early career patterns. In the first approach, the log of citations over the years of activity in the domains under analysis produces a significant result, but the distribution of matches is not adequate at the middle and high ends of the scale. The second approach matches highly creative researchers in nanotechnology and human genetics with a comparison group of researchers that have the same or similar early career characteristics were considered: (1) same first year of publication (2) same subject category of the first publication, (3) similar publication volume for the first six years in the specified emerging domain. High levels of diversity among the highly creative researchers, especially those in human genetics, underscore the difficulties of constructing a comparison group to understand factors that have brought about their level of performance.
  • Item
    Assessing the impacts in industry of basic research
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2006-06-14) Bozeman, Barry L. ; Rogers, Juan D.