Person:
Brown, Marilyn A.

Permanent Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1853/71125
Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
ORCID
ArchiveSpace Name Record

Filters

2009 4
3 2 1
2 2 1
4
4
Reset filters

Settings
Start date: 2009 × End date: 2009 ×

Publication Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Meta-Review of Efficiency Potential Studies and Their Implications for the South
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009-08) Chandler, Sharon (Jess) Ann ; Brown, Marilyn A.
    This paper reviews 19 separate studies published over the past 12 years that examine the potential for deploying greater energy efficiency in the South. These studies contain more than 250 estimates of the energy efficiency potential for different fuels (electricity, natural gas, and all fuels), sectors of the economy (residential buildings, commercial buildings, and industry), and types of potential (technical, economic, maximum achievable, and moderate achievable). The meta-review concludes that a reservoir of cost-effective energy savings exists in the South. The full deployment of these nearly pollution-free opportunities could largely offset the growth in energy consumption forecast for the region over the next decade.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Transitioning to a Climate-Smart Energy Economy: Technologies, Barriers, and Effective Policies
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009-05-07) Brown, Marilyn A.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Moral Equivalent of War: Energy Rhetoric during the Carter Years
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009-01-22) Honeycutt, Lee ; Brown, Marilyn A.
    Many people attribute the failure of Jimmy Carter's forward-looking 1977 national energy plan to opposition from entrenched corporate powers, but the plan's fate also relates to the changing role of rhetoric in the American presidency. From his early fireside chat on energy to the "moral malaise" speech late in his term, Carter seemed unable to reconcile traditional policy tasks with the rising importance of the bully pulpit in shaping public opinion. In this talk, Lee Honeycutt shows how rhetorical lessons from the Carter years provide insight into how the new administration might craft its rhetoric on future energy policy. Includes a response from GT School of Public Policy Professor Marilyn Brown.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Competing Dimensions of Energy Security: An International Perspective
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009-01-13) Sovacool, Benjamin K. ; Brown, Marilyn A.
    How well are industrialized nations doing in terms of their energy security? Without a standardized set of metrics, it is difficult to determine the extent that countries are properly responding to the emerging energy security challenges related to climate change, growing dependence on fossil fuels, population growth and economic development. In response, we propose the creation of an Energy Security Index to inform policymakers, investors and analysts about the status of energy conditions. Using the United States and 21 other member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as an example, and looking at energy security from 1970 to 2007, our index shows that only four countries¡ªBelgium, Denmark, Japan, and the United Kingdom¡ªhave made progress on multiple dimensions of the energy security problem. The remaining 18 have either made no improvement or are less secure. To make this argument, the first section of the article surveys the scholarly literature on energy security from 2003 to 2008 and argues that an index should address accessibility, affordability, efficiency, and environmental stewardship. Because each of these four components is multidimensional, the second section discusses ten metrics that comprise an Energy Security Index: oil import dependence, percentage of alternative transport fuels, on-road fuel economy for passenger vehicles, energy intensity, natural gas import dependence, electricity prices, gasoline prices, sulfur dioxide emissions, and carbon dioxide emissions. The third section analyzes the relative performance of four countries: Denmark (the top performer), Japan (which performed well), the United States (which performed poorly), and Spain (the worst performer). The article concludes by offering implications for policy. Conflicts between energy security criteria mean that advancement along any one dimension can undermine progress on another dimension. By focusing on a 10-point index, public policy can better illuminate such tradeoffs and can identify compensating policies.