Organizational Unit:
School of Public Policy

Research Organization Registry ID
Description
Previous Names
Parent Organization
Parent Organization
Includes Organization(s)

Publication Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Supplemental Materials to “Emergence Scoring to Identify Frontier R&D Topics and Key Players”
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2018) Porter, Alan L. ; Garner, Jon ; Carley, Stephen ; Newman, Nils
    Supplemental Materials to the article on "Emergence Scoring to Identify Frontier R&D Topics and Key Players"
  • Item
    Innovation in Manufacturing: Needs, Practices, and Performance in Georgia 2016-2018
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2016) Youtie, Jan ; Shapira, Philip ; Li, Yin
    2016 report of the Georgia Manufacturing Survey (GMS) - a statewide study conducted every 2-3 years by Georgia Tech's Enterprise Innovation Institute and the School of Public Policy to assess the business and technological conditions of Georgia’s manufacturers. The theme of GMS 2016 is smart manufacturing.
  • Item
    Knowledge Kills Action: Why Principles Should Play a Limited Role in Policy-making
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2014-03-06) Holbrook, J. Britt ; Briggle, Adam
    This essay argues that principles should play a limited role in policy-making. It first illustrates the dilemma of timely action in the face of uncertain unintended consequences. It then introduces the precautionary and proactionary principles as different alignments of knowledge and action within the policy-making process. The essay next considers a cynical and a hopeful reading of the role of these principles in public policy debates. We argue that the two principles, despite initial appearances, are not all that different when it comes to formulating public policy. We also suggest that allowing principles to determine our actions undermines the sense of autonomy necessary for true action.
  • Item
    Peer Review of Team Science Research
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2013-10) Holbrook, J. Britt
    This paper explores how peer review mechanisms and processes currently affect team science and how they could be designed to offer better support for team science. This immediately raises the question of how to define teams. While recognizing that this question remains open, this paper addresses the issue of the peer review of team science research in terms of the peer review of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. Although the paper touches on other uses of peer review, for instance, in promotion and tenure decisions and in program evaluation, the main issue addressed here is the peer review of team science research in the context of the review of grant proposals.