Organizational Unit:
School of Public Policy

Permanent Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1853/70716
Research Organization Registry ID
Description
Previous Names
Parent Organization
Parent Organization
Includes Organization(s)
ArchiveSpace Name Record
https://finding-aids.library.gatech.edu/agents/corporate_entities/1033

Filters

2010 - 2016 4
4
4
4
Reset filters

Settings
search.filters.applied.f.isOrgUnitOfPublicationTitle: School of Public Policy × Start date: 2010 × End date: 2019 × search.filters.applied.f.resourcesubtype: Argument Map ×

Publication Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Benefits of GM Technology Use
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2016-05) Balinao, Elizabeth ; Davis, Jordan ; Marcus, Charles ; Reisinger, Payton
    An argument map focused on the various benefits of GM Technology and why it should be used for food reduction.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Labeling GM Food Argument Map
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2016-05) Balinao, Elizabeth ; Davis, Jordan ; Marcus, Charles ; Reisinger, Payton
    Argument Map focused on the need for labeling genetically modified food products
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ethical Considerations in Developing Lethal Autonomous Robots
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2013) Bai, Kevin ; Batten, Claire ; Merritt, Kendall ; Liu, Tiffany
    A logical exploration of the ethical risks and benefits of developing autonomous agents capable of making decision to end a life.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Debate about the Stern-Review and the Economics of Climate Change
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010-01) Hoffmann, Michael H. G.
    This argument map represents the basic argumentation that Sir Nicholas H. Stern and his collaborators developed in The Economics of Climate Change in form of a logical argument map (Cambridge, UK, 2007: Cambridge University Press; online: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm). The map includes Stern's argumentation in blue; criticism of several of Stern's assumptions by "main stream economists" in red; and critique by "environmentalist economists" in orange. This way, the argument map represents a complex debate on one of the most influential books on the economics of climate change.