Person:
Sprigle, Stephen

ORCID
0000-0003-0462-0138
ArchiveSpace Name Record

Publication Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Mobility Metrics for Manual Wheelchair Use in Everyday Life
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010-06) Lopez, Ricardo A. ; Sonenblum, Sharon Eve ; Sprigle, Stephen
    In this study, a method for the robust detection of manual wheelchair movement with accelerometer-based data logging is used to obtain metrics of wheelchair mobility that complement mean- and total-distance-only based measurements. It is found that these metrics, that include distance, time and number of activity bouts, provide better understanding of everyday use of manual wheelchairs by shedding more light into how users operate their wheelchairs in their daily lives.
  • Item
    A Data Processing Method to Measure the Use of Manual Wheelchairs
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009) Sonenblum, Sharon Eve ; Caspall, Jayme ; Lopez, Ricardo ; Sprigle, Stephen
  • Item
    A Case Study Comparing Activity and Participation Measurement in Two Subjects
    (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007) Harris, Frances ; Sonenblum, Sharon Eve ; Sprigle, Stephen
    This case study compares the differences between complementary methodologies that measure activity and participation in two subjects who use wheeled mobility devices. Data collection consisted of 1) a self-report participation measure for people with mobility disabilities - the Community Participation and Perceived Receptivity Survey (CPPRS) - and 2) a passive instrumentation data-gathering methodology that includes a global positioning system (GPS) data logger, followed by a prompted recall interview (PRI) to confirm GPS data location and query activity purpose. Many of the destination types (e.g., grocery stores) named in the CPPRS were confirmed by GPS/PRI data. Issues affecting subject responses in both methods included ambiguous categories and researcher assumptions about the nature of activity. Differences between self-report and instrumentation data are discussed as they impact understanding activity and community participation among wheeled mobility users and the development of self-report participation instruments.