Here. We. Read. Your. Very. Recently designed. Life. Of Honor. Thank you so much I'm really excited to be here this afternoon and. Very excited to be here this afternoon and thank you so much for ask me to tell you if I participate today. Leadership that's the topic leadership. Every person in this room has experienced. Some of you see yourselves as naturally. Others of you don't see yourselves in that light at all but I can assure you every person in this room has played the role of leader because there's only one essential element to leadership one fundamental thing that must be and that is followership someone must be willing to follow your lead. And each of you at some point has influence somebody to do something that he she or they would not otherwise have done but for your presence but for your motivation but for your leadership. So the question is not are you leaders you are the question today is our unit good. That's fundamentally the question. My purpose is to share with you a few of my thoughts. About leadership. I don't profess to be an expert there are plenty of experts I'm not one of them I don't profess to be rather I want to share with you some of my experiences that I have found personally useful and my hope is that you'll find them useful as well principally because these essential practices of leaders also I find happen to be practices of just really good people and so with that let's begin. The use of that is my glasses here I can't see so well and more so. Practice number one. Great leaders practice clarity of purpose. Now I use the term practice clarity of purpose rather than great leaders have clarity of purpose which many people prefer to use perhaps I don't like that terminology because it suggests somehow that clarity of purpose is innate inherent you've either got it or you don't and I don't believe us the case I believe great leaders practice clarity of purpose and they do. By asking themselves basically two fundamental questions question number one is what is it that I'm trying to accomplish what I want to achieve and question over to is why do I want to achieve that. That's fundamentally what good leaders try to do and I'd like to explore that a little bit by starting with a hypothetical dialogue and then we'll delve into clarity of purpose. You know when we first meet someone typically we engage in small talk. And that small talk kind of goes like this Hi My name is Glenn and you are. So pleased to meet you know. Where are you from. And you might respond you know I'm from that era of the country we have a lot in common eventually you get to the question So what is it you do for a living now my response typically is I work for Royal Dutch Shell. Often they return with so you're in the oil and gas industry. And I say well I suppose you could say that that's certainly true but I prefer to think that I'm in the energy business. I'm in the energy business. What I'm going to share with you over the next few minutes is not my brainchild I didn't come up with it I didn't develop it Peter Voser a former C.E.O. of Shell came up with this notion but I embrace it I buy into it. It offers me guidance and I share it at every opportunity and what he said was this. That shell we work to help meet the world's growing demand for energy in a responsible way. In a responsible merely means in a manner that is socially acceptable economic Levi. And environmentally sustainable again socially acceptable economically viable and environmentally sustainable now. Why do I find that motivating I find it motivating because energy. Is this fundamental to our existence as food is for eating water is for drinking air is for breathing it is fundamental to what we do is fundamental to our way of life. I don't mean to suggest by that that we should be very conscious of our consumption of energy I don't mean to suggest that we should look for innovative technologies and ways to use energy more efficiently more effectively certainly in the developed world we use a lot of energy perhaps more than our fair share. So to be sure one of our responsibilities is to look for ways to generate and consume energy more effectively what you see here in the bottom right hand corner of the screen is a depiction of the shell eco marathon. Now shell sponsors this event in Europe in the America and in Asia we do this every year and the intent is that students from around the world will enter a vehicle that they've designed with the objective of winning by having a vehicle that goes farther than any other on a leader a fuel I don't know the record but I can tell you it is substantial and this is a way that we promote the notion of using technology to better think about how we consume energy more effectively you also see in the in the in the slide here a picture of a windmill I went target. Because shell also looks at wind energy hydro energy solar energy we look at bio fuels in the form of cellulosic algae. Second and third generation we also of course look at fossil fuels oil and gas and we're fairly unique among the majors in that if you look at our reserves greater than fifty percent of our reserves are natural gas the cleanest burning of the fossil fuels with carbon emissions that are fifty percent fewer or lower than coal we're also a world leader in L. and G.. So. You might ask. Glenn you are in trading that was the introduction how do you participate how do you play in this clear purpose in this vision one of the things I said a moment ago is that we help to meet the world's demand for energy in a responsible way which includes being economically viable that's where I fit. You know you give us capital in the form of either equity or debt and you expect a return on that capital and if we don't provide a sufficient return consistent with the risk that you take when you take your capital way. So my role in the organization is help is to fuel the returns engine that's the way I participate I help to fund our ability to pursue. Meeting the world's demand for energy in a responsible way. So again you might ask Well Glenn. Why is the vision really meaningful to you why does it really make sense to you and the reason that makes sense to me is this. Every time your heart beats the world's population increases by approximately two individuals. That's roughly one hundred ten people per minute roughly six thousand five hundred people per hour. Our About fifty seven million people per year that's a lot of people. Between now and twenty fifty we anticipate that the world's population will go from seven billion to about nine billion people that's the equivalent of adding another India and China between now and twenty fifty we also anticipate the by the end of this decade the consumption of energy will go from fifteen to twenty percent and twenty percent essentially represents the addition of another China in terms of energy consumption from two thousand to twenty fifty we expect that the consumption of energy in total will increase from about two million barrels of oil equivalent per year. PER DAY I'm sorry to about four hundred million barrels of oil equivalent per day. That's a phenomenal increase in energy consumption and again you might ask Well Glenn. Why is that motivating to you well I guess the fundamental issue is this. In twenty fifty I may or may not be here. But you will be here. And the clarity of purpose you guys the decisions that I make that impact your future guys the decisions that I make that impact their future those are my daughters and I'm certain that they or their kids will be here. Clarity of purpose hopes to inform our choices and that's why it's motivating to me to know that when we talk about making energy available for our society in a responsible way it's meaning. Is a purpose there's a larger than me so again when you ask me Glenn what is it what is it that you do. I'm very proud to say I mean the into. Business that's what I do. Practice number two. Great leaders practice the behaviors that they want to see in others. I had the privilege of. Ten years ago or so to go to a leadership workshop at Wharton. And there was a professor there who his name I don't recall but I recall is a lecturer very well. He was an older gentleman. I think it was a professor emeritus actually. And. He had silver here is rather short he knew very very slowly. But. When he began to lecture his talk was swift He talked at one hundred miles per hour is thinking was crisp he was clear was a bill sharp as a tack and whenever he'd ask a question of the group it was a noticeable lag and noticeable pause as our minds struggled to keep pace with his Eventually someone cautiously raises hand or hand her hand and respond to his question so anyways this professor told a story that his wife his wife had asked a question of them and the question that she asked was. Honey she said to him. Do you think our kids really love us I mean I know they say they love us but do you think they really love us or are they just waiting for us to die so they can collect our money. He was apparently pretty well off. His response was wife was. You know. All of the major holidays that we celebrate Christmas Thanksgiving Easter. We celebrate those holidays with our kids and their families. He said Every Sunday we have dinner with one of the kids without fail. My birthday your birthday our anniversary they never ever ever forget that. We want to see the grandkids They're always around we don't want to see the grandkids they're never around. He also said. When something's not right in the house something's not going right we need something repaired and we can't handle it ourselves one of our kids show shows up one of them shows up they're always there do our kids love us. So I don't I don't really know. But I'm getting all of the behaviors that I want. And I choose to interpret it as love I'm getting all the behaviors that I want. Ralph Waldo Emerson said what you do speaks so loudly. That I cannot hear what you say. Behaviors alternately are what indicate to others our intent. Ethics. Our desires who we are. And getting the behaviors that I want. In shell. Each year we. Log about fifty thousand hours in our helicopters typically going offshore. And to participate or to go offshore in these helicopters training is required. That training is essentially basic off shore safety induction and emergent. Training and as the name suggests the intent of the training is to ensure that you have certain foundational fundamental knowledge on certain critical safety. Such as sea survival helicopter escape as required. Emergency first aid etc Now naturally the hope the desire is that you'll never actually have to use those skills but if it's necessary it's absolutely fundamental that you have the training now the time that's required invested in this training is non-trivial is about two and a half days three days. So if you're going offshore just once or twice that's a pretty significant investment but then burden our C.E.O. said if you're going to do this if you're going to make this journey you must you absolutely must take the training no waivers no exceptions and what you see here is been doing the practical component of the course which is the helicopter escape he's demonstrating by his actions his intent and the behaviors that he wants to see in the organization so we had an opportunity to share the story with staff at Shell we do it across the web and then they respond accordingly. And this is what some of them had to say. They said you know this is so great to see in the past. I've seen support for deviations from training due to time pressure this shows the importance of just as the training to keep our people safe that's number one great leadership by example walking the talk inspires everyone. Now recognize that shell we are technology firm we're an engineering firm we have a lot of engineers scientists. Tax attorneys accountants we can be fairly linear and so. We had wanted to get this sort of response which is entirely appropriate as well this is very sensible if you helicopter goes down to see is not like gravity or the laws of nature are going to graduate just because your C.E.O.. Ben agrees he took the training and he's demonstrating through his action that this is incredibly important actions speak louder than words as Mark Twain said but not nearly as often our objectives as leadership as leaders is to minimize the gap between what we say and what we do behaviors matter. Leadership practice number three. Great leaders shape culture. And what do I mean by that. When I say culture what I mean is the way we do things around here is where we get things done it embodies the behaviors that we value. I like to make a distinction between culture cultural values and ethics ethics are those immutable. Never changing sacrosanct moral principles. That we just don't touch there are things like humility and honesty and integrity and respect for others the types of things that your parents taught you when you were quite young we don't touch those. But leaders do shape culture and they shape culture in a way that meets the objectives of the firm or the group or the team or the family it's important that leaders shape culture. When for instance culture is shaped poorly. Then you can have really quite catastrophic outcomes I happen to experience and. Lived through one of those catastrophic corporate outcomes then it said earlier I worked for Enron now for many of you in two thousand and one you were twelve thirteen years old maybe younger for some of you. And you probably don't recall all of the scandal in details regarding the demise of Enron which was at the time the largest corporate bankruptcy in U.S. history at sixty six billion dollars But. I can assure you I remember it extremely well. I remember that on December second two thousand and one that was a Sunday morning in Amman filed for bankruptcy I remember going to work on December third. And. There was a manager about nine o'clock ten o'clock or so who climbed up on a trade bench in the middle of the floor and in his most sensitive voice yelled out. Go home. You don't have a job anymore. I remember. People taking small boxes and collecting the contents of their desks and streaming out into the street. I was watching the monitors it was like it was everywhere I was on C.N.N. And it was on Fox News A.B.C. is everywhere and I was still in the building and I recall many of them just taking a seat on the steps of Enron and they took that seat because you know many of them were from the suburbs they took the bus in and they returned buses weren't. They weren't there weren't there weren't traveling it so they were stranded. It was a it was a rather. Challenging experience because it's awkward for me at least I was one of the survivors I was I was there after the bankruptcy and you go through all of the stages of the. Loss that you might imagine you go through the denial you go through the bargaining you go through the anger you go through the depression and finally you go through the except as you go through all of them having had the experience I would wish upon my worst enemy I really would it but I learned so much from it it's shaped the way I think about my business the what shapes the way I think about how engage my staff. It's very very very key to to how I view the world today. As you can imagine many speeches have been given. Many books have been written even movies have been made at this point describing the myriad of reasons why Enron failed. But I'm going to distill it down to just one. Enron experienced a failure of leadership to shape the right culture. It's that simple Enron experienced failure of leadership to shape the right culture I'm going to reference Willie Peterson's account and I do this because I think you did a really nice job of describing the essence of the situation at Enron. He said basically. Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling his protege. Their objective was to create a new winning proposition and that winning proposition was that Enron will thrive it will succeed. By creating new markets. And if you look at the gas and power market today there are a largely shaped on the basis of Enron's work. So they've had enormous had a substantial lasting effect on our industry they also thought that free markets should shape the way the company was structured internally. Nothing wrong with the. Either of those options nothing wrong with that at all. Recall you may recall that Enron came about as the amalgamation of two old school pipeline companies so the transformation of culture within the organisation was significant in fact what you found was that they were going to became relatively flat. There are only three or four levels between the C.E.O. and the common staff or. Enron competed very effectively at the business schools the best business schools in the country warden Harvard Sloan Chicago you name it and they were successful in getting those young minds who would otherwise have been destined for Wall Street and wrong was lauded as the most innovative company in America for three years in a row. In Iran also instituted a fairly draconian measurement system and reward system it was called we thought of the ranking exist they were basically five levels. The top level the top five percent they enjoyed just extraordinary rewards. The bottom fifteen percent their days were numbered at Enron if you were in that bottom fifty percent you weren't likely to be around for long. The challenge with the structure was that most of the reward was a function of individual contribution and maybe a little bit of your business you know performance but it wasn't very focused on how to Enron perform. And to see what that's the problem I'm just going to use a little analogy I like soccer my girls played soccer I coached soccer or even ref soccer from time to time and if I ask you what is the purpose of the soccer team what is the purpose. It is to. Is to win right the purpose of the team is the way. Right. Now if I were to ask you there's the defense and they all fence and I ask you what is the purpose of the defense it is to. Protect the goal stop the score. If I ask you what's the purpose of the officer going to tell me as to score simple enough now. Because I'm a wise coach and I want to motivate my office it's I sit in my office of players I'm going to pay every member of the office a thousand dollars for every score that is scored for every goal a thousand bucks to every member of the author. Which do you think they will prefer would they prefer to lose the game seven to eight or to win the game one to zero. My suspicion is they're going to prefer to lose seven to eight because that's the motivation in the compensation scheme that I've established for them I've taken the primary objective of the team which is to win and have subordinated to the secondary objectives which is to protect the goal and to score. Enron did much the same thing. To structure as the management of Enron was seeking to you know continue to. Make untenable growth targets or promised untenable growth targets for the markets the structure was such that staffers in order to preserve their positions to avoid their rank in order to contain enjoy enormous bonuses were encouraged to deliver more and more lucrative deals. I'm not going to get into the accounting at Enron but they use mark to market accounting and it has certain implications we can talk about another time but the bottom line is this what eventually happened is risk taking which is good. Became recklessness as bad. Entrepreneurial ism which is really quite good became irresponsible. Excellence became a bit of arrogance. And individual accountability. Became cutthroat competition and in some instances criminality. And I don't want to suggest that everyone in Iran was was was was was a criminal or a bad person ninety nine point nine percent of people there I count myself among them were good people. That said good people sometimes in bad situations do bad things. So we have to be careful. About the structure. And the behaviors that reward it's clear that Enron got what it wanted I can assure you that Jeff Skilling Ken Lay did not set out to destroy the company and they certainly did not set out to destroy their reputations no question about that. The problem is that in the transformation of culture. When things went wrong they didn't check them. They didn't apply the tension that kept things in good balance and as a consequence. If you start recognizing that this is the standard and you do a little infraction and you get comfortable with that infraction that becomes the new standard and next thing you know you make another little infraction and that becomes the new standard and another and another and another and eventually you're far removed from the standard that you originally established you're far removed from the norm that largely occurred in Enron. So people tend to judge. Unethical behaviors at time in light of the outcomes they tend to be judged more harshly when the outcomes are negative and less harshly when the outcomes are positive often performance systems often focus on what did I deliver. They don't focus too often on how I delivered it. And I'm fond of saying again I borrow this liberally from others and I agree as ation I'm fond of saying how we make our money is as important as the money we make it is fundamentally it is fundamental. The victims of this failure were real people. With real stories with real lives I recall going out to dinner with a friend of mine Tim several days before the banquet so we didn't know that it was going to be fall that we can but we knew it was it was coming he and I went out to dinner and had a very gravelly voice. And he said to me. As I swelled with emotion he said to me you know Glenn. I am sixty three years old. And in a week. Maybe two. I am going to have to start. To work again as if I were twenty five I've lost everything and his story is not unique He's just one of the. Who experienced exactly the same thing the choices we make have impact that are significant. And the impact real people in real lives so what do we take away from this number one as you create a relevant culture create a relevant culture that promotes the strategic aims of the organization that's number one number two what gets measured gets done what gets rewarded gets done repeatedly. Measure and reward the desired behaviors. Positive culture requires persistent attention. And lastly culture is a way of life. Is not a document. Practice number four. Leaders set high standards. Leaders set high standards. Between two thousand and two thousand and nine thousands of lives were lost. In the oil and gas industry. And Shell. The vast majority of our staff far and away observe our safety culture day in and day out but where a serious injury occurs and worth to tell it does occur almost without fail is because of noncompliance with safety with the culture of safety. Almost without fail. At Shell we refuse to accept the notion that serious injury and death are an inevitable consequence of working in our industry I just don't accept that. So Peter Voser. In two thousand and nine he introduced the life saving rules. These rules are not new. They're not unique. But they are powerful in the following sense the expectation is that every individual who works for show needs to know which of these rules apply to him or to her. And they must honor them for me as an example if you look at the lower right number one journey management plan when I'm traveling and identity management plan number two if I'm driving buckle up number three don't speed and don't use a cell phone while driving number four. No drugs or alcohol use that will impair your work or your driving. Smoke going designated areas I don't smoke that doesn't apply to me. Others that apply to folks in the plant don't walk under a suspended load makes sense a lot of injuries grow that way don't welcome their suspended load. If you're working at height secure yourself. Protect yourself against a fall. Don't override systems if you're going into a confined space get permission. Don't override safety lockout systems. Do gas tax tests and were required to get permits. They're not complicated not all of them apply to me in my in my work space but it's important that we recognize and observe the standards and one way that I demonstrate the standard for my staff and my expectation of my staff is for instance when I travel and I take a taxi. I ask a few questions before enter the taxi number one I say the taxi to the driver. I work for Shell and we have a policy and the policy is that we wear seatbelts when we drive can you do that I can do that and testing with another policy that you don't talk on your phone while you're driving are you willing to do that. Great fantastic and when you do that and there are three when you're driving you're not going to speed I mean that's just our policy will you agree to do that yeah I get it fantastic and I'll use your service and if the answer is No I don't use that service. Because. It's one of our life saving rules it applies to me and applies others who are in the car with me especially if they're driving me and I want to show business. Our goal is. No harm to people. No harm to the environment no harm to assets that's our goal. Since two thousand and nine when these were implemented. Last. I'm injuries have come down by forty two percent. Fatal into. Fatal incidents have reduced by seventy five percent that means that maybe as many as thirty lives in our organization. Have been saved. The key here is standards matter. And. The guiding principle is set the standard demonstrate the standard demand the standard simple set the standard demonstrate the standard demand the standard is not complicated. So I'm going to wrap this up and just summarized by saying. Great leaders. First they practice clarity of purpose and guides the decisions we make. To. Great leaders practice the behaviors they want to see. Fundamental. Great leaders shape culture. Cultures the way we do things. And lastly great leaders practice setting the standard demonstrating the standard and demanding the standard are you a great leader are you any good. I suppose the answer that question is just a matter of practice Thank you so much for your. Question. How do you know. Well. I think one of our key accountability as leaders in the show is that we take responsibility for individually training leaders that is one of my accountability as I seek opportunities to share. What I've learned what I know to develop others as part of my. Part of my remit. Is fundamental to what we do for instance what I do is I have a number of mentoring circles that I have where we will choose a book or two. And we will get together in the course of nine months and we'll go through the book and we'll do it chapter by chapter and then we'll use that as a basis for conversation to talk about leadership in application to their current work environment or to their personal lives I find that to be a very useful way to do it leadership by example you demonstrate by leading by developing others personally. Absolutely. Lehman Brothers followed and I said in Iran was a sixty six billion dollar bankruptcy Lehman was a six hundred fifty billion dollars bankruptcy huge implications I'm sorry interrupt you. Yeah so so I'm a big believer in bonuses. But. I do. But that said I think it's a function of how you structure it so what what happens often especially in trading environments. Is this and in my opinion a huge mistake that people can get really extraordinary bonuses in a single year and what I mean by that is that people will therefore take risks in order to achieve that bonus level and may be in appropriate risks and if they're right they get a fantastic reward and there's no long term consequence they walk away if they're wrong they may get fired they'll lay low for about six months and then go work someplace else and try again I think is a very very bad recipe we do something entirely different from a long term perspective yes our traders do well but they do well over time we don't give them a million paper we want them to have an investment and how our business does for the next three four five ten years and that's a fundamental distinction over time our traders do as well as any but they don't do it that the cash flow pattern looks very different. Yes You know we tend to talk about leadership as if you have to be in a managerial position and that's really not my intent leadership is about motivating people to do something so whether you're an individual contributor or whether you're leading a large organization your ability to influence people to do good things is leadership and so I see it daily play out on the trade floor in meetings with individual contributors or with leaders alike because it's about influencing behaviors to get good outcomes is not about holding a position. It's about influencing so it applies to everybody. Or give you the same and. You know I don't. This. Are. So. I think the way I respond to that is this. When I talk about personal achievement and I think in terms of an organization like Shell or any other company I really think it's important. That as an individual you find a space. That is motivating to you and is consistent with your personal principles with your personal objectives and that is aligned. You know I said a moment ago that. When I went to work in Iran. I went to work for the image of what I thought in Iran was. I learned that Iran was something different. And I remember saying to a friend of mine at one point I said you know I don't this is before the bankruptcy I said I don't want to I don't think I'm going to be here very long not because I didn't work some really really short really capable people there were some really sharp very capable very smart individuals and that's this was quite fun but it wasn't entirely aligned with my own personal values I was I was starting to discover so I look for ways to avoid conflict between my personal objectives and the objectives of the firm when I talk about being proud to work in the energy business I really am I do believe that energy is fundamental It excites me to know that I'm a part of providing that for our society I don't see a conflict there and I encourage you to try. Define opportunities that don't provide conflict so it makes sense. You are. Very. Different. I don't know if my observation is peculiar to the fact that it's European versus American but there are clearly very real differences in cultures and different in different organisations if you look at our organization shell it tends to be more of a consensus oriented business when I talk about behavioral norms and cultural values one is I don't make decisions around here do we do it by consensus or do we do it by individual accountability that is not a moral choice. Both are perfectly acceptable but I can assure you have very different outcomes in the firm and to be more consensus oriented in a place like X. I'm more mobile content people less from census oriented and I'm not saying is bad saying is different and I don't know if that distinction is your opinion as American or not I just know that there are differences of that nature. If not let me present the land with a movement so he doesn't get this visit this is a scroll that says scribed presented in honor of the Philip sixty six C. J. P. Silas program in ethics and leadership school of chemical and biological engineering Georges to technology to Glen Wright. Thank you so much.