One thing I do have to say is you guys will be looking at me and the slides during the presentation what I'm looking at right now is the food. So if I start drooling you are going to insulin shock something like that and you'll know why I'll be staring. At the food for about the next though. You guys are really putting on the dog but. But the downside of that is I would be looking at the food in the whole presentation. So the title to the talk today is imaging in healthy aging and dementia bigger sandbox and. The title is inspired by recent. Trends in the all timers disease world and. You know those trends essentially our talk a little bit more about this in a minute that all timers disease and aging are merging as the all timers folks begin to look for biomarkers of all timers disease in healthy aging folks. So we're all going to be playing in the sandbox the same sandbox. Already are in fact and. That trend I think is going to continue and I've become convinced actually in putting this presentation together that it's really going to change Aging Research in some very significant ways and you know the ways we get funded and so forth and Karen I study sections and so on will probably be changing as well. So. Let me first. Get my mouse to work. OK Well yeah obviously I've co-opted the mouse with laser pointer but I. Want to mention my collaborators on the first forward to change to ping who Jason Langley and Lisa Krishnamurthy. Are all in more physicists and are largely responsible for programming the pulse sequences and also I had some input to picking the pulse sequences along with these folks that we're using in the Healthy Aging study. At Emory or what we call the Emery brain imaging project but you'll hear me refer to it as the Healthy Aging study because it's a sub study of the Healthy Aging study and our post-docs an image analysis folks are. He cheesy Anglin and twang honed by a hand and a stage of both Ali So it's a fairly large group of people that we're talking about here in and. They're the geniuses behind the pole sequences here. So what's going on with all Simers disease and I think a good example of what's been going on one of the things that's been going on recently it's motivated. Some thinking in the area of alzheimers disease is. The failed clinical trials with the early all Simers disease and. What they set out to do was to change the. Typical all timers biomarkers of amyloid or. Using monoclonal antibodies like Bappa Newsom Amber Solar News a man and as it turns out they were pretty successful in doing that this is from. Clinical trials for all timers disease presentation of Fox in two thousand and twelve and they're showing here that with a four carriers. The genetic variant of the apolipoprotein in. That bapineuzumab could significantly reduce fossil OTOH in the cerebral spinal fluid. At this five milligram per kilogram dose and in. For non carriers they need a little bit higher dose to achieve the same level of reduction and these are changes from the mean in standard error of the of the groups and so as you can see the changes in terms of the Standard years are actually fairly large changes. But the reason why the trials failed was that the cognitive in points did not change. And one of the. Thoughts about why that happened is because by the time you get to early Alzheimer's disease when your patients are symptomatic that the horse is already out of the barn the damage has already been done and you can't change cognition and this is prompted people in the all Simers. Disease research area to think that if we're going to intervene in all Simers disease successfully what we need to do is to do it before people become symptomatic. So that means they're cognitively normal essentially and you are looking for biomarkers both to tell you when you need to intervene but also to tell you how you need to intervene or what you need to do. So what does that mean we're all going to be playing a bigger sandbox as I said earlier. So. One way to conceive all Simers disease is as a cascade of events and this is from an article by reason Sperling from Harvard. In two thousand and eleven and she proposed this cascade in the earliest of the markers of the things to appear is the abnormal accumulation amyloid and you can measure this either in the cerebral spinal fluid or by PET scanning. And. Amyloid you know occurs in about thirty percent of cognitively normal folks over the age of sixty five and its star it starts off around it you know in sixty five around fifteen to twenty percent something like that and then becomes a. Positively Excel orating function of age. So it Excel or it's the older you get so the idea is that in your preclinical stages where the cognition is still normal that you can get a fair amount of amyloid communiqué mutilation and at least according to this figure at me even peak before you even become symptomatic and get mild cognitive impairment. Of the next thing in the cascade at least of known elements is the Sinak to dysfunction which is basically glucose metabolism is measured by PET scans closely followed by abnormal levels of Tao or FOSS the Tao again. Until recently measured primarily in the C.S.F. but there are biomarkers under development to look for. Deposition as well and then after that you can begin to see changes in brain structure. For example a good predictor of conversion from. M.C.I. to all Simers diseases size of the hippocampus. And then after that is cognition changes. And you begin to show cognitive changes of course that in C.I. that get worse until you get to the dementia phase when you begin to see changes in actual daily clinical function in the idea that mild cognitive impairment is you have the cognitive impairment but it doesn't affect your activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living. And when it does that's when you get to the to the old Simers stage. And so one of the things I think that we're doing is searching for. Biomarkers even further back is one of the things that we want to do so that we potentially could even prevent the amyloid deposition. And what that means is that all Simers disease research is trending towards looking at healthy aging. And indeed I think you know if there's a take home message from the talking you'll see this in about three or four of the studies I'm going to talk about. It is that. Our our world and aging research is going to be changing. And I think word of stage now where you know if you want to be one of the pioneers you can help determine some of the ways in which it's going to be changing but it will be changing in terms of what we're looking at and what it's going to take to get funding for me and I and so forth. And indeed as you saw on the omnibus budget bill there's more money for all timers disease and so forth the I guess a lot of our Congress folks are getting older and. Beginning to worry about their. Preserving their cognition. So I'm going to. Well let me go let me just go through a little bit more background information first and then we'll start to talk about some of the imaging your imaging biomarkers that we're going to use in our study so one thing we started to do when. When the Healthy Aging study at Emory came into being or the Emory Healthy Aging study you'll see me refer to it as both and again really what I'm involved in is a neuroimaging part of that but. There's too many acronyms involved so I'm just going to refer to it as the Healthy Aging study we began to look at other large studies that were going to be done the Healthy Aging study is a study where we're trying to in an internet survey collect data on one hundred thousand people. And then to do a deeper dive in the King at biomarkers. Blood base biomarkers C.S.F. biomarkers genetics to know mix proteomics you know etc cognitive testing and so forth in about thirty five hundred people and now those thirty five hundred we're going to try to get imaging in a thousand plus folks. So it's. You think that's an ambitious study right but we began looking at some of the other large studies that have. Are are being done longitudinally and mon is the German national Cold Heart Study where the goal is to develop new strategies for risk assessment early detection and prevention of common wind spread diseases. And. Focusing on the emergence of chronic diseases including all its arms and so forth they're going to have two hundred thousand study participants. Aging looking at aging between the ages of twenty to sixty nine years old in eighteen different centers where thirty thousand having him are I skin hands and the M.R.I. images are going to be the typical T. one weighted structural imaging flare and resting state. Bold F. M.R.I.. So that's a lot of subjects. There. Another study in mostly in Germany called the Rhineland study on the goals are identifying modifiable and non modifiable causes of neurodegenerative or neuro psychiatric diseases and looking at biomarkers for individuals at risk they're going to have thirty thousand people thirty years of age and older. And seven centers and their core imaging protocol is a little bit larger than the German national study they'll get T. one in T two multi eco T two star rated images which will you know you can do quantitative susceptibility mapping from functional M.R.I. and spin eco E.P.I.. Diffusion waited him or I and some of the. Each participant undergo at least one of the other imaging modalities including. Body fat evaluation metabolic imaging quantitative. Imaging magnetization transfer quantification and high resolution images to look at the hippocampus in locus or earliest and so forth so again another thirty German seem to like the round figure of thirty thousand for their studies for imaging. And that's kind of dwarfed by the U.K. by a bank study which. Is going to be looking at one hundred thousand participants launch a tune we between the ages of forty to sixty nine years old. And within the image cohort They're expecting about one thousand five hundred participants to develop Alzheimer's disease by two thousand and twenty two so that leaves them a fairly large sample to begin to look for predictive biomarkers. And M.R.I. images are listed as T one T two flare susceptibility weighted M.R.I. wresting if I'm right to ask if a Marine diffusion F. M.R.I.. OK So looking at the world of large aging. Old studies. We came to the conclusion that we're not going to be unique by collecting images in a thousand subjects in a world where thirty thousand and one hundred thousand are the number of subjects you're going to collect right so one of the conclusions we came to was well I think what we can do we rethink what we can do is to do more candidate imaging sequences for biomarkers and then narrow down our imaging sequences by pilot study and that's where we can be a little bit more unique. And so what I'll be doing today is talking about the thirteen poll sequences and some data supporting from the selection of the poll sequences that reusing. The studies chosen I mean this could be thirteen different lectures you know one on each poll sequence and what it is and and the data supporting our selection of it. But I've got an hour to talk so I chose some studies and. They're good examples is the reason that I've chosen them but you might ask good examples of what and that's where there's a little bit of diversity some of the studies are a good example of why we chose the biomarker some of them are a good example of how not to analyze your data I think. And others of them are probably the ones that look like they are going to predict our future and studying cognition and aging. OK so. Yes you're. Well yeah so you know how to answer your question if they were to go out another five years and I don't seem they're going to stop in two thousand and twenty two they just picked that date and told you how many they expect. The you know the biggest risk for all timers disease is age yeah that's right age. So the longer out they go down the curve should be exhilarating in terms of the number of persons out of their hundred thousand. That have all timers disease so they go from. You know that figure well I think was given around twenty seventeen so if they go another five years out you could expect to have more than another eight hundred participants with Alzheimer's disease because it's a positive you know the people who get all Simers disease eventually is a positively Excel orating function of aging. OK. And I don't assume they're going to stop I mean why would you give up a database like that I mean they're still studying the Framingham Heart patients that started like quite a couple decades ago or more actually and they're still studying that cohort is becoming particularly popular cohort with the also members community because they have such long longitudinal data why would you give a you know why would you go to the trouble to do this if you weren't going to fall in over a long period of time which the implication of that I think is that you know it's going to involve a generate a generation or two of researchers right were some of the older guys are going to be handing off the baton and probably some of the more image interesting data may come out twenty or thirty years from now maybe. Looking at the age of the subjects so we have think this is necessarily unique but we have a conceptualization of aging and aging related diseases in our lab that I wanted to mention to you very briefly because it'll. It's my bias and. So it probably will color some of the things that I talk about today. And that is that there's an interaction between aging and aging related diseases so this is just made up curves they're not representative of anything in particular other than you know you look at cognitive measures probably a better word for. These values over here and we know if you as you get older your cognition declines. But the idea Sheer is that as your aging inner X. with a. Some disease process that it's going to do it in a way where there's an aging by disease interaction and the older you get probably the more. The disease is going to take its toll because just simply of the fact that you know you're losing your cognitive function. As you get older. So you know how does that. How does that translate into something clinically. Well one of the things that happened in your phase your world in the early two thousand as Marnie Naser out of Boston published a study using R T A mass in the right parts triangulator us and the idea was that if they inhibit right par strain heiress and they knew this from some pilot data that you could actually improve word finding or other language functions and folks and they were successful in doing that it's been replicated at this point and so forth. So there conceptualization was that in a phase except Jex there is an over activation of parts of the right hemisphere and if you treat that over activation basically you can get improvement in language functions well as you may know in a lot of cognitive functions that are lateralized you get more activity in older folks in the non-dominant him a sphere for that activity and so we've shown that. When you. Well let me get into that in a little bit later because that's part of our research I think I've got several slides on that so. To talk about the Healthy Aging study and the neuroimaging part of that in terms of neuroimaging the types of things that we're looking at are. First. Endothelial dysfunction or other words that's the wall of the blood vessels right to. Get more torturous as you get older cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen or cerebral metabolism would be another word say that. Structural changes in the brain. Changes in neural melanin one of the earliest structures to show the lawyer accumulation and all timers disease is the locus of. And it's also a neural melanin rich area so the question is whether or not the accumulation of amyloid might affect the neural melanin and that can be used as a biomarker looking at. Gamma. Or Gabaa concentrations which is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain in glutamate concentrations which can tell us about neural inflammation looking at white matter integrity and functional conduct to Vittie as well as blood brain barrier compromise these are the different areas that we're going to be looking at with our poll sequences. But also in the context of the healthy aging studies that said we'll have blood based C.S.F. based the biomarkers. And the logical testing and a lot of information about lifestyle such as levels of self reported activity. Diet and so forth and so we'll have all of those things to. Also bring to bear in looking at the interaction of our neuroimaging biomarkers with those other variables so it really is quite an ambitious study and the idea of the Healthy Aging study was to try to have some kind of a breakthrough impact on how we look at also armors disease and identifying biomarkers Having said that you know there probably will be other types of disease processes we can look at as well. OK so the. Neuroimaging pilot study phase one which is the phase that we're in right now. Is looking at collecting data from. A senior somewhere. Well somehow I get this reversed now. M.C.I. patients that. You know hide in that. Head are all timers that are. Amyloid positive. About thirty of those folks yes sumption is that their amyloid positive their most likely program all Simers disease looking at asymptomatic older folks who are also amyloid positive but cognitively normal looking at a. Symptomatic older folks who are amyloid negative and then looking at young folks because as I said earlier our idea is that we have an aging by disease interaction here and so we want to look at disease relevant factors but also look at aging relevant factors saloon look at the aging relevant factors by comparing young to old will look at the amyloid substrate by comparing the cognitively normal older folks who Ramel only positive to those who are amyloid negative in the disease factors my comparing older folks are randomly positive to people with him C.I. who are amyloid positive so it gives us a way of breaking down this space into an aging component a disease substrate component and a disease component more or less and beginning to look at things the neuro imaging measures which are we're doing in two sessions are we've got the key one awaited him or I the T. to flare the diffusion weighted imaging you know from which you can do track dog or fee and. Measures of white man or integrity arterial spin labeling which measure cerebral blood flow quantitative susceptibility man. Being which measures iron deposits cerebral vascular reactivity is going to be measured by giving people hyper Kapnek challenge by having them inhale a higher level of C O two than usual which will dilate the vessels and. Give us some idea of what the maximum bold response is which will. Allow us to do some interesting things to get to in a few minutes a neural melanin scan to look at neural melanin rich areas particularly the look of surreally of so that we can also do the substantia nigra. Resting state functional comic to video M.R.I.. Regional cerebral metabolism we can do with a trust sequence that was done in on John Woo's lab. Gabba M.R.S.. Mylan water which we'll talk about in a couple of minutes neuro inflammation is done by looking at glutamate concentrations is the way we're going to do that so that's also done with the M.R. spectroscopy and then dynamic susceptibility contrast which involves. Injection of the gadolinium based contrast. So. Why did we choose all these things let's talk a little bit about that. And you know the idea here is eventually we'll go to phase two are going to collect a thousand or more subjects and what we want to do in phase one is by doing the comparisons with the disease and maybe even the predictors between who has the amyloid stub straight and not is to pick the scans that are most promising to. Dip to pick biomarkers for a larger sample and that's the phase that we're in now. So here than neuro aging neuro imaging protocols for. Phase one pilot study the first is gab M.R.S. as you all know gab is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the nervous system and in terms of negative bold responses to task where your bold activity actually goes down instead of has been shown by North off and others to be related to the gavel levels. In the brain correlate with the negative bold responses. So basically N.M.R. spectroscopy is a little bit different than those of you're used to doing functional imaging you pick up a large voxel in our case of three centimeter by three centimeter by three Samina centimeter voxel and you basically do. Get a spectrum of where you can identify the levels of different neurochemicals which include Gabbidon as you can see here relative to even glutamate where the signal is small and you get the gloomy peaks in two areas. But relative to even even glutamate which is small gab is smaller so you have to have pretty good M.R. spectroscopy images these images are courtesy of Lisa Krishnamurthy. So why did we choose Gabba spectroscopy Well we've been looking inhibition ageing for a long time but gal published a study in. Two thousand and thirteen in neuro image where they showed that M.R.S. in the media frontal cortex. Has a point six the gavel levels have a point six correlation with ageing What does that mean you're explaining nearly fifty percent of the variance. In your Gabba signal by a person's age no other factors and we know we can change that arm We're pretty sure we can change that with exercise or we've got good indications we can so that accounts for forty six percent of the variance in that particular area so it seemed like something good to do what work of we've done in inhibition and I'm using the royal. We here this first slide is. About work done by Keith McGregor some of you know key and basically Keith uses a measure called the silent period yes people squeeze the Manipulate and I'm in. Around fifty percent of maximum force and then he stimulates the motor cortex and in the Ipsa lateral hand of the stimulation you get a decrease in the E M G activity for a few tens of milliseconds after you know somewhere between you know sixty to eighty milliseconds and this is an inhibitory phenomenon that we think that people have shown is driven or can be driven by Gabaa be activity. Using back off and. As a. Drug and. So what happens what Keith this showed in his early studies is that for send Terry older adults the it's a lot of silent period is shorter than for active older adults and it shorter for active older adults than it is for younger adults. And he has showed that the absolute silent period is also reduced at midlife for sedentary. Adults midlife. And what do you also showed which is unique in this study is he also divided his young group into active and sedentary and there are no differences in the Ypsilon silent period for younger adults in the twenty to thirty five year old age range I think is what that is. So this is something related to sedentary and aging. And what Jonah. And and Keith have shown recently is that you can make the Ipsa lateral silent period long again by engaging in a row because exercise. So you're up Celera silent period begins to look more like young folks. OK well that's motor stimulation with T.M.'s basically and evoke response and measuring the it's a lateral silent period. And he's done other measures with T.M.'s that that haven't showed a difference. What about things like language which is something that we have done a lot of studying our lab This is Christina wearing a dissertation. And one area that she noticed. She gives a picture naming study having folks name pictures it's actually more complicated than that but not worth getting into at this time. And she showed in right parts triangular Eris which is a part of the right inferior frontal gyrus that older folks showed a typical. Bold response. But younger folks after small initial positive inflection showed a large negative deflection in this area. Which is kind of similar to what Keith was seeing in the motor system right so. You know this is opposite. His was. In the hand that was opposite to the hand connected to the motor cortex that was being stimulated right and this is cortex opposite to language cortex that should become active in picture name. What Marcus mines or came along in did after that what's. Was to look at accuracy levels and to correlate that with that bold signal and basically what he's showing in ageing is that if you're able to maintain a negative bold signal. Your level of accuracy is higher this is the bold signal here and if the bold signal goes below baseline when you're doing semantic fluency essentially I give you a category you tell me words from the category is that you have a higher degree of accuracy and semantic fluency the lower your bold signal is this occurs in the frontal lobe but also in some post your areas and he replicated that in two thousand and twelve. So one interesting thing about this. Bold signal in the. Write him a sphere is that if you do aerobics exercise you get a decrease in bold activity during semantic fluency and semantic fluency improves so the idea here is that activity in the right hemisphere is probably not good OK so I don't want to throw out Harold in Tire Lee right you guys know Harold the human spirit case in a tree reduction in older adults is the compensatory mechanism. But in this particular instance it appears that the right hemisphere activities probably actually interfering with naming based on our study we've also done some T.M.'s research which is consistent with that as well and also if you look at the regression of V O two max on the ball change during semantic fluency you also see that your VO two max is correlated with the decrease in bold signal so the more fit you get all the lower the bold signal goes. OK And so. That is the reason why we're doing Jabot spectroscopy because we think that that Gabba is driving a lot of what we're seeing in both cognitive and motor events in aging. By the way also the other thing that Keith has shown that I didn't mention is your motor performance also improves it's not only the it's a lateral silent period but your motor performance. So there's also as I mentioned earlier a glutamate signal this. Spectrogram has not been even doubt. In terms of the baseline levels for the the different areas of signal but there's glutamate signal here and that glutamate signal basically the higher. When you have a neuro inflammatory process as you're good to mate signal gets reduced so we're going to be measuring glutamate levels in that same voxel and. Those the lower to me would be an indication perhaps of neuron Flamm atory processes which are important in all sinners disease so cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen. This is a study that comes out of Han John. And basically what he shows that on the average as you get older your cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen actually increases. And that's seen as a little bit paradoxical I guess in some places. But there's the approximate rate of being creases. Somewhere in the one and a half to two percent neighborhood predicting life but what happens when you get. M.C.I. is that your serial metabolism all the sudden starts to go down in a fairly large proportion relative to the increases that you see with the aging So one question that we have here is whether or not there's a point of inflection where you change from increasing to decreasing. Metabolism that could be predictive and of course you know that scatter of points was fairly large that I showed you earlier So one question is what's the reliability of your individual measure because those were different subjects all those data points you're just looking at and so there's a reasonably good interest session correlation well you're correlation between sessions actually gets lower as your variability goes up so we don't know how good that measures going to be but we're going to take a look at it anyway I should have probably put the scan up the way that's done is by getting your arterial oxygenation levels with pulse oximetry you know on your finger but looking in your Venus system in the brain so that gives you an idea of what the blood going into the brain as caring in the way of oxygen and you take a measure in the superior sagittal sinus of what the oxygenation levels are with the a mirage and that will give you an idea of what your whole brain tabel is and looks like since the superior sagittal sinuses draining large areas of the brain there are other ways to do this get higher resolution but that takes more time and since we're doing thirteen sequences times that a little bit of a premium so we decided to use that sequence it's called that. The acronym trusts the Quins. In terms of box a base more Fama tree. I'm not sure that this measure actually holds a lot of promise because what happens is where it's particularly. Useful for predicting conversion from M.C.I. the ADA he is looking at your medial temporal atrophy and this is. Three years before. This is one year before I can version and I believe this is that conversion if I remember them the images correctly but the reason for doing this actually is that if you can predict the beginnings of the. Temporal atrophy with another biomarker you can kind of ratchet back your prediction backwards in time so it's a way of. You know taking something earlier and him see I and in ratcheting your prediction backwards and times if you can find something that predicts this. Decrease and temporal lobe grey matter. Out of paying whose lab. Jumping. Did a poll sequence. Chan was the first author on that published in two thousand and fourteen showing that they could identify areas with. Neural melanin. Sensitive sequence in the locus rule us and other labs have showed that if you look at. The contrast to noise ratio by verbal kind. I Q As measured by the test of adult reading that there is a correlation between the contrast to noise ratio for Neural melanin older adults and no correlation in younger adults so the idea is that the neural melanin sequence. Given the fact that the locus earliest is involved relatively or can be involved relatively early in all timers disease may give us an early signal so one of the things we're going to do then is to look at neural Mellon and contrast and particularly in the locus of really it's. So in terms of diffusion where you did imaging there. A number of different ways you can analyze your diffusion waited images in basically what. Derby and folks were doing is looking. At whether or not they could distinguish healthy controls from M.C.I. that is amyloid positive. And they looked at different indices of both. Structural imaging scans and diffusion weighted imaging. And the best index they found in this particular prediction was was to mean diffusive a D.. And in particularly when the correct the mean diffusive of the with the regression equation for age and other factors they get the best prediction seventy seven percent correct and the instinct thing about this is they they put fraction on I suppose and isotropy mean mean defeat. Motive and I stop trape white matter volumes from the structural images grey matter volumes from the structural images all those things plus the age and the other factors that they were using into a. Support vector machine and what they. Support vector machine and actually the single measure corrected with the regression equation from mean diffusive and he was actually a little bit better than the. Data from the support vector machines so mean. Measures might not exceed this particular one but in this case the multi kernel support vector machine was not able to produce better results in just using a few seventy. So that's one measure that will probably be looking at. And one of the things you probably know. Is that diffusion kurtosis imaging which is thought to give you more accurate measures than D.T.I.. Diffusion tensor imaging is one thing that we're going to try on that but we've also got measures that can look at multiple diffusion directions in a single voxel and and we'll be using those measures as well with those skins. To look at the. This or the white hyper intensities in the white matter that occur with the. We're going to use a. T two aided flare image and automatic segmentation of those areas of the system you can see the hyper intensities in the three percent of Luke. Three percent of the vine Maki pipe by the curry osis around the ventricles in. Greater. Volumes of Luke where Yosef you can see it spreading into the corona radiate and if you go higher into the center. And so forth and see whether or not those changes. Predict cognitive changes. We're going to be doing mile in water a fraction the idea behind mile and water fraction is that there is that the environment in which water is found affects that its teeth to decay and. In particular there is water between the layers of Mylan that surround the axons in the white matter and that T. to decay is much more rapid. And then if you look at free intra an extra cellular water and has a much longer T two K. T two D. K. and. Basically you can look at. Mylan water levels and compare them to the. All of the water in the brain the Mylan water plus the free and then get a mile in water fraction is essentially what you're doing there. And. Colleagues basically showed that. There are areas Mylan water content and water fraction associated with amyloid precursor. Levels of amyloid precursor protein as the blood base biomarker I think it's blood based. If I remember correctly. So. You know the idea here is that your Mylan water fraction may be a very sensitive indicator that your mileage is beginning to. Decay which is probably related to these and so forth and in fact what Dean and colleagues also show is that if. If you take your. Measures of Fosse the town the cerebral spinal fluid and you divide your subjects at the median into high and low levels of Fausto tau is that your subjects with higher levels of Fausto Tao show a significant. Reduction as you go across ages and that's the cross-sectional study but you can see the correlation line between age and decreasing Mylan water fraction is fairly high. With subjects who have. High levels of Fosse with Tao are one of the also amorous biomarkers. Resting state F. M.R.I. basically they're using a measure called pair mutation entre P. I don't really have time to explain that now but ask me later and I'll be happy to talk more about what peer mutation entre P. is. This is probably not a way that we're going to analyze our resting state if I'm right data and the reason for that is where we want to do get something that's sensitive to the difference between normal controls and an early M.C.I. in this particular population would be what would be ideal for us and none of these particular. Areas of the the cortex do you get that distinction so pear mutation entre P. is probably not a very good measure for us. And. Arterial spin labeling will give us cerebral blood flow which is you know correlates with Pat in Alzheimer's disease so it's a useful substitute for F.T.G. although. Lisa Krishnamurthy will probably be working on an M.R.I. based way to do ghost metabolism. But you can see that older persons show decreased cerebral blood flow particularly in the frontal cortex the red areas are higher. Yellow areas have somewhat lower blood flow in the green areas are very low but those are really actually the ventricles of there's not much blood flow there. But you can see the cortical ribbons the place where you're getting high levels of blood flow and it's higher especially in the frontal lobes and younger than older folks and these images are courtesy of Lisa Krishnamurthy. And vascular reactivity as I said earlier basically you're dilating the blood vessels looking at your bold signal and you can think of the bold signal as being in. In your sort of Ashley reactivity is giving you a maximum increase for. Your bold signal and you can and what happens interestingly enough. You don't see a lot of change from an elder from elderly controls to amnestic M.C.I. at least in this particular study coming out of Heinz young lose a lab but what you do see is that older subjects show. Cerebral vascular reactivity than younger folks and in fact what John John and his colleagues did in one study is basically to correct your bold response in. A. I think it was an image viewing task that they were using and in in V one in the media of Temporal Lobe basically the uncorrected responses which are in blue showed significantly lower. Bold response in young than old people but when you correct for C.V.R. there's no difference between young and old. And indeed in. Other areas of the cortex during this task and particularly in fear frontal gyrus when there was no or minimal activity change for the uncorrected signal when you correct the signal you get much more robust changes and there increases in activity rather than decreases and in this study when they corrected for C.V.R. they didn't find any decreases in activity for the young relative to the older subjects which they did find if you don't correct the signal so there's you know beginning to emerge a degree of concern in your grant reviewers and in your article reviewers and terms of comparing old and young with F. M.R.I. bold activity as to whether or not you should be correcting for Siri revascularization activity changes and it's still I think a little iffy depending on who your viewers are as to whether or not they do that in fact I just advised a colleague of mine not to mention cerebral vascular reactivity because she wasn't going to be able to correct for it and just to send it in and see what happens and if they ask for it she can figure out a way to do it maybe set out a cycle and and resubmit you know. The worst thing you can do. You know do a breath hold or you can also use resting state to divide devise an egg on an estimate of sort of a basket reactivity. We're doing dynamic susceptibility contrast and there is an interesting study. Suggesting that there's a particular part of the blood brain barrier that gets compromised and you can detect that compromised using. Dynamic susceptibility contrast which is you know essentially with the gadolinium based contrast agent. This is just a picture of the neurovascular unit with the in Ophelia being the kind of first line of the blood brain barrier but it also involves. A. The Astro City in feet surrounding the blood vessel of the peri bachelor space the basement membrane but particularly the Perry sites the Perry sites are what get compromised and here you can see in the hippocampus the brighter colors indicate more of the. Gadolinium contrast getting into the tissue which is higher for older adults even higher for him C.I. This is a multiple sclerosis as a control and then the young controls it's even in aging you get some leakage of the blood brain barrier and you can see that happens. In CA one ca three the dentate gyrus and the hippocampus proper in all those areas so that's another thing we're going to be looking at and finally we're using quantitative susceptibility man being and you can do a couple of things with that one is you can. Locate microbe leads which may be related to him ridges Will why is that important you tend to get vascular calm compromised there's amyloid with the in the areas of amyloid deposition and you get tend to get micro bleeds around. There so you can detect some microbe leads with that. Quantitative susceptibility mapping which is taking advantage of the fact that iron deposits in the brain from the. Blood in the micro him EJA him ridges will show up but you can also exclude those micro him ridges and just look at Iron deposition and this is the one thing that I think is very prescient because what we're looking at here is different cognitive tests. And these are the domains that tests come from. And you can look over years period of time at the change in the. Score of these particular cognitive tests right so and this is standard deviations per year and what you will notice here is if you look at the amyloid positive which is the yellow line and you know Malloy negative that. In the amyloid positive subjects what happens is your. Your level of. Iron deposition in the tissue predicts cognitive decline so it's an interaction between your cognitive function and your iron deposition and your amyloid status here and this is the one I think is particularly present prescient for those of us studying cognitive ageing because what it shows is this interaction between oxidative stress is what the iron in the tissue is thought to indicate am a lawyer and and that becomes important. Only for the amyloid positive group in terms of predicting decline in cognition and so these are some of the thanks. It gives you an idea of I think where we're heading in the future. In terms of studying cognition and aging and I've gone a little bit over mine a lot of time but you can kind of get an idea of where this project is going and maybe some ideas about what's going to be going on in studies in aging and in the futures. Thanks for your attention. We have time for questions of Cripps. I'm still looking at the food. Feel free if you have questions. I know it's two visits about usually two and a half hours we have some subjects if they live far away we're willing to image them in one day but we don't like doing that because you know the more you lie down the more restless you get and you know the higher the pain from the head corals the kind of tight and so forth and you start to get head motion towards the end of an hour and a half worth of imaging and. Even if you take somebody out for hard put it back in they're still restless and it kind of compromises the imaging So you like to do the first session of an hour and a half in the second session of an hour in the last thing we do in the second session is the dynamic susceptibility contrast because the gadolinium is going to hang around for a while and you know affect all of our other imaging So it's the last thing in the protocol. No this is. We're in a we're in phase one right now where we're still looking you know we're going to eventually not do the young and not do the amyloid. Positive M.C.I. folks and just concentrate on the cognitively normal older folks and look and see whether or not we can use our biomarkers to predict the difference between the amyloid positive in the amyloid negative seeing the amyloid positive theoretically is being asymptomatic all timers disease or. I guess we wouldn't quite call it progress that's really more the term reserved for him c I But you know that's a thought so when we go to the Thousand are only going to be looking at older folks and looking at the diversity and the positive. Yeah right that's the Right now we're there and the reason that we're doing that again is we want to be able to pick the most sensitive biomarkers to study the Healthy Aging and then you know the idea is that at some point in time in the not too distant future we're going to support this by grants from an I.H. Once we've established the cohort. And so forth. And we should have launched today the whole data and all of the biomarkers that we're looking at as Wells connoted testing although as you can see from these. Diagrams you know when you repeat cognitive testing sometimes there's an advantage. To you taking the cognitive tests again because you can see in the amyloid negative folks. Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah. Yes Yeah. Stream very very. Well there's a. Three years of research with the C.S.F. biomarkers they've established a level of C.S.F. biomarker that they feel is significant and oddly enough in the amyloid you'd think it would be more C S F amyloid but it's actually less is a bad thing in terms of the C.S.F.. But they've established a threshold that they feel. Even clinically these days a lot of people that go to. Places that have eighty or Cesaire using C.S.F. amyloid cutoffs to help them understand cognitive changes and complaints and older people so it's a cut off Korea. Correct yeah yeah that's true and in fact you know what might be the continuum is probably going to be of more predictive value than splitting them but you know for the sake of. Simplifying their analyses. They divided into namely positive and when you do you know Chris So I mean one of the interesting. Studies showing. It's. Five. Hours project come on. You're well yeah right it's just you know so. Yes. Well probably choose the most promising. Indices from each image type. You know that we can figure out based on the literature and put them into an ass V.M. with other biomarkers and look at whether or not you know what kind of prediction we get but we'll also be looking at the images individually you know to understand them on our universe at level if you will in an individual image level. You know that's not a political law like we get one value for the gabble levels and you know one level of value for. Cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen but another you know like the. Images where we're analyzing them in a voxel wise level yeah we'll be looking for areas and probably doing exploratory analyses or and or well hypothesis driven. Region of interest level. So yeah well we'll probably doing all those things hopefully we've got enough analysis horsepower with three or four people working for us that we should be able to both feed data into an ass V.M. where we can put all the other viral markers in it and you know use multivariate algorithms to try to get the best detection combination but we'll be trying to understand regional differences and individual image level and smaller level where that more targeted in an interactions as well I mean there's a lot of things we can do with these data a lot of ways that can be analyzed and be thirteen image sequences but also you start thinking you know probably I don't know we've got probably fifty sixty one hundred other biomarkers genetic markers. Cognitive functions you know so I you know I think the real issue is to think about what it is we're trying to predict or what it is that we want to find out and then tailoring the analysis to do that. I think that's going to be the real challenge is thinking this through in a way. That we don't capitalize on chance and do the right. Target the right. Indices. For that. But. Yeah I mean that's a really important and yes I would assume with that many variables there's going to be plenty of multi colinear T. that we need to avoid in terms of how we analyze and model the data yeah I think that's a very good observation and your questions well I was enjoying coming out and talking to you guys. Happy to take any other questions an individual level if you want. I don't know. I don't know that we've decided that I think the model that we're currently using is more you know people proposing studies. And looking at those are we going to make them publicly available. I don't know I think that's a good model and on the long run I think there are some biases toward that I don't know that that decision's been made perhaps it has I don't know I assumed you know we're going to want our investigators to to get a first crack at them but I don't know that you know if somebody were interested in a particular set of biomarkers or something like that or had a particular question and if they came to us and wanted to look at it you know we go wow that's an interesting idea let's talk about how we can do that together like that I mean I'm open to that I can tell you that and there are more data than you know we're going to be able to think of every analysis for. You know from my standpoint if somebody were to come to me and do something that makes a lot of her want to do something with the data that make a lot of sense I would say OK let's talk to. The gunas Yeah yeah yeah absolutely. The students it's something. Yeah one more. Thing.