Well I mean one water could use a stop over here. Well you know. What to get through our speakers today so we're pleased to have Dr that is a. Georgia Tech the love doctors here yesterday. With just heard worked in department a real science there is a thirty. Started here ten fold last fall straight from fifty five that. Industry. Is here today to talk to us as they do a little. Engineering. And he's here to talk to us today about how we do performance. Materials. All right. Thank you it's a pleasure to be here I appreciate the invitation to speak at the nano tech seminar everybody here me pretty well Mike's on all right so today I'll be talking about some of my previous work related to dynamic process is an electric chemical systems and understanding these processes and engineering materials for improved performance. And at the end I'll briefly mention some of the things that my current group here at Georgia Tech is working on now since I started in the fall. So in general kind of an introduction to electro chemical systems. Electro chemical processes and devices are very important for many types of energy conversion and storage so you guys have probably seen the Tesla power wall right this is kind of a bed for personalized home energy storage to get off the grid there's fuel cell vehicles there's electric vehicles are run on batteries as well this is a toilet a fuel cell vehicle they've been pushing the. For a long time there's also devices that can make electric chemical fuels so basically splitting water is one way to make a fuel you do this electric chemically to produce hydrogen right and so all these different. Applications are enabled by different types of litter chemical devices for the quite important for for energy storage and conversion. So if we take a look at what a letter chemical device generically looks like this is kind of a schematic here so this is maybe a battery or a fuel cell you have two electrodes and anode in the cathode you have some sort of electrolyte in between electrolyte passes ions and not electrons you then have some external circuit where the electrons pass right and so during operation of this electro chemical system you have ion motion in the electrolyte an electron motion through an external circuit so on the device scale these are the types of dynamic process we're concerned about but there's different lengths scales that are important in these devices so if we zoom in a little bit look at the surface of one of these electrodes we may have a bunch of particles that are stacked together in a certain way that are important for device operation and this is this is we've zoomed into the Misa scale now so we're on a smaller scale bar but on this scale there's other things that are important as particle particle interactions that become important they have to be controlled for good performance there's also electron an ion transport in this architecture now between particles and among particles if we take another level of zoom go to the nano scale now there's different aspects of device performance that we have to care about so in a battery for instance we may have phase transformations that occur in particles This can cause mechanical degradation fracture lots of different dynamic things that happen. We could also have a material so this is process such as an electro deposition right when you're growing a new crystal on a surface from the liquid solution this is another dynamic process finally you can have corrosion and dissolution of a material in the nano scale which usually you want to avoid. In order to have good and durable performance so the summary of the slide is that across all these like scales we have these dynamic things that are happening in system and these electrochemical systems and really to engineer better systems we have to understand these dynamic processes and control these dynamic processes. So I'll talk about two different research areas today these are things that I focused on in the last few years as a student in a post-doc and continuing to focus on in my faculty position the first is high capacity materials for lithium ion batteries and the second is developing stable photo electrodes for electrochemical fuel production these are simply conductors that absorb light and produce fuels like hydrogen. And the overall overarching goal is to understand it control the dynamic behavior and interfaces in these systems and hopefully the last slide was a good introduction about why that's important. All right so we'll start with batteries so batteries of course everybody knows lithium ion batteries have enabled. Portable electronics they will enable the revolution of portable electronic in the last fifteen twenty years with the I am batteries have a very high energy Misty compared to other types of battery systems like nickel cadmium or nickel. But even though they've been very good for phones and laptops moving to new applications like low costs and long lasting electric vehicles which maybe not is this one woods a nice picture we need different types of batteries so we need batteries that are lighter smaller and cheaper and so this is a big research area of course I'm sure many people are familiar with it. But if we take a look at what a battery looks like and try to understand how we can make them smaller lighter cheaper basically that presents itself pretty quickly so this is a schematic of a battery we have two different materials that are used as the anode and cathode then there's an electrolyte in between we talked about this before with the ions going through the electrolyte but the basic the energy limits on this battery are given by this simple formula down here where the lithium storage capacity. Times the voltage of the total system is your is your energy content and so to increase the total energy content with the same size system we need to either increase the lithium storage capacity in your materials or we need to increase the voltage between the materials and so the materials I'll talk about today are materials with significantly higher lithium storage capacity which could lead to higher energy density in a full battery system. All right so one of the materials and one of the primary materials that has received research attention is silicon from lithium ion batteries so silicon is a replacement for graphite as the end of material graphite holds lithium and the capacity of graphite is this number here three hundred seventy two million power's program that's basically like homes William Powers is another way to say that silicon You can see is almost an order of magnitude or more than an order of magnitude. Higher right and so very high capacity so we know it has I theoretical capacity so why don't we use it the problem is that there's a different reaction mechanism when lithium react with silicon compared to when lithium reacts with carbon or graphite So that's shown here schematically So lithium actually alloys with silicon so you take fifteen lithiums atoms and stick them with four silicon so you form a new phase a new ally phase lithium fifteen silicon for very let the enrich has a very large volume compared to the initial silicon You can see here if you start with silicon particles they react with lithium to form larger particles but they break up into smaller pieces and fracture is mechanical degradation that occurs and this is bad for your battery performance basically your particles some lose electrical contact in your battery electrode and they become dead weight basically and you lose capacity over time so this is in contrast to graphite where we're lithium can actually be inserted directly between the graphene layers in the graphite and this is a very versatile process very small volume change only about five percent and so you can insert lithium and remove it over hundreds and hundreds of cycles and that's why your batteries last a long time and your phones. So these different reaction mechanisms are fundamentally the reason why even though we know this has a high capacity we we have not been able to use it successfully because of the capacity to K. with cycling so. The goal here basically in the research arena on these materials is we know that there's this large capacity so maybe we can try to understand exactly how the reaction mechanism occurs and if we can really understand the volume changes the reaction mechanism and also the mechanical degradation the fracture that occurs in these particles maybe we can engineer them specifically to accommodate this expansion reversible e expansion contraction if we could do that maybe we could make a good long lasting battery with these materials but understanding these reaction mechanisms are kind of difficult because conventional electro chemical experiments don't really give you any insight into these mechanisms so that's that's what I focused on in the past understanding these reaction mechanisms with new techniques. All right so the main technique or one of the main techniques that I've used is called in situ transmission electron microscopy or T.M. so T.M. is a is a very high resolution electron microscopy technique where you can image materials at the atomic scale. But in situ means that we're actually doing some sort of reaction inside the microscope we can observe it while it happens so to do that we use a special sample holder. So the T.M.C. or Georgia Tech are downstairs and they're pretty large the sample Holder is pretty small this is only about a centimeter wide here this image and but you can see here this is zoomed in image of this an optical image there's two probes one here and one here so on the sample holder we have these two probes we can actually put battery materials on these probes so for instance we put lithium Coble oxide which is a common lithium containing material in one probe and we put silicon or silicon nano wire and animate serial on the other probe and then inside the microscope we can actually move these probes together actually with nano scale precision almost an animator level precision and we can contact them there's an electrolyte in between so this is a liquid electrolyte it's an ionic. Wood has a very low pressure so in T.M. It actually doesn't evaporate You can also use solid electrolytes which I've done and it's very useful but the electrolyte is key because when you bring these two things together you've now contacted them but there's no legible connection only an ionic connection so you apply a bias and you can cause lithium ion to flow from this electrode through the electrolyte and to react with the silicon nano wire and you can image the reaction and real time to it's just it's very similar to a real battery reaction but you basically build a nano scale battery cell that you're operating. All right so here's a video of this process a little hard to see here because it's dark but hopefully you get the picture. So this is a silicon nanowires sorry this isn't a particle this nanoparticle is attached to a nano wire kind of down here and you'll see this process lithium is going to be reacting with this particle and you'll see it expand and something interesting happens at the end. So this is fifteen times actual speed. And you'll see this darker core region see the darker region the shrinking that's the silicon Crystal and silicon core that shrinking as a lithium reaction to this lighter region around the edge is actually an amorphous litigated silicon very highly lithium it has a larger specific volume so that's why you see the volume expansion what happens is one at some point towards the end of the reaction is you see this this crack initiate grows across the particle the particle breaks into two pieces so it's pretty cool this is a this is kind of a real time demonstration of what might have to be happening in a real battery electrode that could be leading to capacity decay with cycling but what you saw there was this process where you have this highly with the added silicon phase it's a morph a sexually we know that from the imaging and there's this sharp reaction front between this phase and the crystalline silicon and the reaction front moves in concentric lead towards the middle of the particle and eventually we see the fracture occur and the particle break into two so some questions arise from these types of videos So first of all why does fracture occur at the surface. We saw the crack initiated the surface we need to understand stress evolution to understand how that happens and then second of all with these types of images and videos we can directly correlate the reaction kinetics to the driving force and things like that so we want to understand the reaction kinetics. So first I'll just briefly mention these this stress evolution and why fracture occurs at the surface so everyone may not be familiar with mechanical stress analysis this is actually a calculated plot that shows the hoop stress mechanical stress inside this particle in the midst of litigation so imagine the particle looks something like this where there's a silicon core and the lithium silicon shells were about half way with the added here if we look at the stress across this particle starting at the middle going to the surface we could see that it's fairly large First of all so we have Pascal level stresses this is much larger than you'd normally find in a chemical reaction and you can see in the core we have compressive stress so we have pressure in the core to move out to the surface we have this big drop here which we'll talk about later but then we actually move towards a service and we get tension so there's tension at the surface so we have these large stresses that we have tension of the surface and this tension of the surface that arises actually causes the fracture to initiate the surface. So an interesting thing that I observed along with one of my colleagues So clearly this is at Stanford when I do this work is that there's a strong size dependence to fractures of particles and pillars nanostructures of different sizes do or do not fracture depending on their size so that here's just an example plot showing this so this shows this is basically we imaged a bunch of these particles and pillars and determine whether they fractured after that the nation you can see the particles above about three hundred sixty nine meters in diameter fractured ninety five percent of the time or more below that it drops off significantly almost zero percent so there's this critical size for fracture it's about three hundred meters so below that you can let the these particles you. You have this large volume expansion and there's no fracture that occurs this is a really important number for for manufacture real battery electrodes so nanostructure smaller than this three hundred meter value should be used in real batteries so the reason why there is this strong size dependence has to do with this strain energy that's inside these particles so the strain if you're a member of some of you may have taken a fracture mechanics classes or something like that. The strain energy is what drives the formation of a new crack right so the strategy is just the energy this contained within the whole structure due to the strain that's there there's lots of strain there but with small particles there's just not enough material to allow for strain the strain or G. to build up to the point to drive the fracture so in larger particles This is the case so we have this strain energy effect to be that that is seen when we use particles of different sizes. All right so on to the kinetics measurement so this is another interesting thing and you'll find out that after we can analyze the kinetics actually the stress evolution of these large stresses that exist in these particles actually influence the kinetic strongly as well. But this is an individual particle here we can see and it's going to become with the added I'm going to show some images here and what you'll see is we can map out as a function of time how big the particle is and how big the crystal in core is so we started about eighteen and meters in diameter down here in this particle or this image here from this side. After a little bit of time the particle has begun to be lifted and you can see this little darker region that's the crystal in core so we can map the outer diameter and the crystal and core as a function of time after more let the ation you can see that this initial fast with the Asian trajectory slows down quite a bit so we have fast of the ation and then the particle kind of vilification process stalls over here and so you can see that in a single particle here as we let the eight so the reaction slows down so initially this wasn't too surprising but upon further analysis turns out that it was very surprising so. In terms of the detail kinetics I asked the question what kind of kinetic should be expect so we have these particles the reactor with lithium it's some inner facial type reaction we think because we had this this reaction front that's moving the sharp reaction front so there's basically two different. Very simple types of of limiting cases that we could expect in terms of the kinetics of this process the first is if the if the reaction at the interface or at the silicon lithium silicon interface was the rate limiting step this is the really an extent we have short range interactions that are controlling the kinetics and the interface itself should move proportionally with time so it should be a linear a linear shrinking with time. Actually a little bit faster in this because we have a sphere but it's very close to linear. For the fusion limited kinetics which is the other possible limiting case or one of the possible any cases we expect that the the the lithium to thickness should grow with the square root of time and this is commonly known square root time kinetics for diffusion limited cases but in fact we have neither of these the data that we observe from lots of different particles slows greater and this the slowing is more dramatic than either one of these is more dramatic than linear of course because we have this non-linear effect but it's also a greater slowing than we'd expect from just a squirt of time based kinetics. And I measured many many particles sixty to seventy of these particles and they all showed the slowing effect so so what's happening here so what we think is happening sorry is we have this strong effect from the hydrostatic stress that evolves in these particles so the hydrostatic stress is the pressure so as we lift it this particles are already told you that there are these high stresses that evolve near this reaction front there is actually a very high pressure that evolves and it changes as a function of the extent of let the ation So this is just this is a little bit complicated but this is the hydrostatic stress or pressure inside this part of. All right at this reaction front as we're lifting idiots over as we lift the eight we move this way and the stress gets more and more negative so as higher and higher pressures and these pressures actually influence the driving force for the reaction so this is the good free energy of a generic reaction to get free energy of course in the letter chemical system has a chemical component and an electrical component and this is how we usually write it in electrochemical system we usually don't write the mechanical component to give free energy but is there and the reason we don't usually write it is because it's usually extremely small compared to the chemical driving force of the electrical driving force but in the case of this extreme volume change reaction which results in these very large get past level pressures actually the mechanical driving force for this for a component of this gives free energy becomes the same or close to the chemical driving force and so what we think is happening is basically the particle starts let the aging and eventually the pressure reaches the point inside the particle that it just stops the process from occurring because it cancels out the chemical driving force of the reaction it was a very interesting process and it wouldn't happen unless we had these extreme volume changes and these particles so I should mention there's a teach you here at Georgia Tech. Very soon after I publish this initial paper reported similar observations in nano wires silicon nanowires underlip the ation and they undergo a very similar let the process and similar stress evolution to particles so it seems like there's good agreement across different types of geometries. And this is this is an important observation. Mainly because you saw how this we had this reaction slowing process so in real batteries this this this fundamental process this fundamental limitation of the kinetics could influence the actual maximum charging rate that you could have in a battery system using these materials so that's kind of the link towards a real battery system. OK So so far I've talked about Crystal and so. And so we have this nice crystal these are all single crystal particles and they react with this sharp reaction front but what about a more facility and so so many people may know that amorphous silicon is a relatively common material silicon is is a little bit unique in that way in that you can easily prepare it in both the amorphous Crystal in states. Receive for the crystal and say phase of silicon there's a two phase interface during the reaction fracture occurs when the particles are about three hundred meters and we also see this slowing in the reaction kinetics so what about for a more facility in an amorphous silicon Of course we have a disordered. Matrix of atoms there's no atomic lattice But how does this influence the reaction process. So I have a video here this is going to be really hard to see but we will see a little bit of expansion but the interior will be hard to see this is a this is a morph a silicon sphere it's about four or five hundred meters in diameter it's attached to a silicon rod here this is only this is acting as the lithium highway so this really has no influence on what we're observing but the lithium travels through this other Silicon rod to react with the silicon sphere so we're concerned with the silicon sphere here and again this is fifteen times actual speed. So if you look closely there's this darker region that shrinks again it's kind of hard to tell here but there's this darker region you can see the expansion maybe a side. Not that important to see I have an image here you see a little bit more clearly here this is some spheres in the midst of the ation you can see there's this sharp front here between this darker region and this lighter region so there's less of a contrast here because materials inside the T.M. don't scatter as strongly as crystal materials but we can still say that there's a pretty sharp reaction front between this. Silicon region and the amorphous pristine silicon region and in fact there's been some other work that shown this is actually anatomically flat reaction from. So this is. The result of this is is basically this reactor looks very similar to the crystal and case and one of the reasons why I bring this up is this was very surprising because from previous electro chemical experiments actually the reaction front was not expected to be atomically flat or even flat at all this supposed to be very diffuse but we've observed this this very sharp reaction from these experiments. So the one thing I want to say about amorphous silicon beyond that is I want to contrast the fracture behavior to the crystalline silicon case so before we saw actually that crystalline silicon particles fracture and there's a critical factor size actually that the particle fracture size is about two hundred nanometers. The pillar fracture size or nano pillar fracture size critical fracture size is about three hundred meters so you can see here is an image of a particle fracturing upon with the Asian So how does this compare to more facility and so I tested I tested amorphous silicon particles up to eight hundred meters in diameter and none of them fractured and actually since this work there's been additional experiments showing up to two or three microns in diameter for amorphous structures there's no fracture upon that the Asian so amorphous silicon appears to be much more resilient against fracture than crystalline silicon and so it appears that using amorphous silicon in batteries is probably a good idea number one Fundamentally though. The reason why this is because. A more of a silicon expands isotropically During with the ation So this is something I don't really talk about but crystalline silicon undergoes an isotropic expansion you can kind of see that here so this is the crystalline silicon core and this is a half way with the added particle you can see this core is highly faceted even though the original particle was a sphere so this is this facet of core results because lithium actually reacts with different crystal plains of silicon at different rates and because of that you have expansion in different directions at different rates and this causes actually stress concentrations at certain places and that's one of the main reasons that fracture occurs in these crucial in part. So that was a very brief explanation of this there's been a lot of work on understand the an isotropic expansion of silicon but it's rather obvious now that a more facility and has no underlying lattice rides just an amorphous structure there's isotropic expansion because of that there's no stress concentrations and so it's more robust and will not fracture upon the. To very promising these experiments have shown there is a very promising material. All right so that's what I'm going to talk about in terms of silicon understanding silicon reaction with lithium there's one more slide here this is just a kind of highlight some of the parallel. Efforts that have gone into engineering in silicon and structures and testing them in and battery systems and trying to improve their performance so there's been a lot of work developing engineer nanostructure So this is actually work from group at Georgia Tech this is some work from a previous group at Stanford for some citations but basically the these studies are dedicated to engineering these nanostructures and testing them in batteries and trying to improve their cycle life so here's an example of capacity over a number of cycles you can see that this this material here this engineer now structure is actually a hollow carbon material with silicon struck nano particles inside results and very high capacity over a thousand cycles so this is much much better than need than you would get ten years ago where you have maybe a capacity to cycle life of about ten cycles so really improve cycle life and the main reason is because of these engineer Nash treachers they're specifically designed to accommodate this volume expansion and contraction and I you know I like to think that a lot of this work across the world really has it's gone hand in hand with some of the fundamental understanding that has also been pretty widespread some of these studies it just showed in terms of understanding these reaction mechanisms and I think that the fundamental understanding has been very important for for showing you know the pathways forward in terms of engineering better in structures that can accommodate these changes. So that's been a really nice area of research I think the last seven or eight years even. All right so a little bit more about these battery reactions so I've been talking about silicon primarily or only until now but lithium actually reacts with many many materials and there's lots of different options for materials and battery systems so this is just an example of another material that actually undergoes a different type of reaction with lithium So this is a T.M. image of copper sulfide nano particles so this is a fraction pattern these nanoparticles are actually disks and they're excitedly shaped so we're looking down on the face of the disk here well this is actually more like a circle but they're supposed to be exactly shapes. And it has exceptional symmetry. But these copper sulfide materials undergo what's called a conversion reaction so instead of an alloy reaction which we saw before where lithium simply forms a new phase a conversion reaction is a little bit more complicated so there's the chemical reaction or the electric reaction I should say of lithium with Congress will fight so you start with copper sulfide you have lithium ion electrons to reduce the material and you end up with three different phases you end up with lithium sulfide which is a lithium reactor with the sulfur and then you and you also have copper metal So this is more complicated and the question is you know we have these particles we know what should happen electric chemically but we don't know what how the morphology should change we don't know how the volume should change because this final mixture of two phases could take any number of forms so studying this type of reaction is also quite important. So what this looks like actually is the this is these are two different particles and they're sitting on a carbon carbon support here looking along the edge of one of these particles so you can see actually the lattice fringes here very high resolution image. This is the for you transform this image to these spots here correspond to these lattice planes and these lads planes correspond of these spots here so we can determine that this is. And has that correct a lot of spacing and all that So this is before reaction so we can in this process we can image these particles right before reaction and right after reaction so after reaction they look like this so before we have these nice lattice French's And right after it's changed quite a bit we still have this particle down here you can see we still have these lattice French's see before and after but now we have this little hat right this guy's wearing a hat now and what's this so this is actually the copper this darker region is the copper metal this lighter region down here is actually lithium sulfide So this is kind of subtly very interesting before we had this copper sulfide particle after we've ejected the copper metal to form a new copper particle and then a particle and now we have a lithium sulfite particle that is in the exact same location with almost the exact same lot of spacing as the initial copper sulfide So we have we retain the morphology even though we undergo this rather dramatic transfer. So that was interesting when we discovered this so why is this happen so if we look at the atomic level structures of these two materials copper sulfide lithium sulfide we can get a good idea of why this this retained morphology occurs so here's copper sulfide high resolution image and this is a Fast Forward transform same thing for lithium sulfide you can't really tell much for these images they look pretty good though I must say but let's look at a schematic to help us understand what's going on here so this is the you take this image actually you can basically map it out on the schematic so this shows the sulfur atoms and the atomic structure and the yellow and then the copper atoms which which are dispersed rather and are rather complex manner and this copper sulphate material they put in part here is if you look at Lithium sulfide the sulfur atoms are in almost exactly the same space space lattice lattice points. The spacing between the sulphur layers is almost the same only about two percent different and so basically the lattice of these two materials is almost exactly the same so what happens is when we insert. If you mean the copper sulfide the lithium comes in the copper can actually diffuse very quickly this is a material known for that and the copper actually diffuses out of the material and forms a new copper metal particle on the surface and lithium basically just replaces it in a lattice and so this is kind of like a cat ion exchange process almost where this usually happens and a liquid environment here is in solid state. And so we have this interesting and we basically retain the particle morphology during this exchange process. And just this is just very brief here but we can also image this process while it happens in slightly larger particles so this is a copper sulfide particle here before the reaction this is looking at the same particle lithium sulfide after the reaction but we can color code the two different phases as the reactions occur and so in red we have copper sulfide to start with as we start the reaction we can see that some blue phase occur forms at the left side that's the lithium sulfide phase and as we go across the lithium sulfide phase grows across the material and eventually converts completely to lithium sulfide So this is this is different than the images before this is actually a high resolution atomic level image showing a reaction this occurring across the single particles so this is this is actually kind of difficult to get this data so I'm pretty proud of that. All right so one more one more slide here this is pretty cool so I showed you what happens when a single copper sulfide particle reaction lithium we had this transformation in the lattice the copper gets kicked out to form this new particle but something really interesting is what happens when you have a bunch of these five particles all touching each other so that's what's happening here there's probably one hundred or two hundred copper sulfide particles in this in this region here and it's kind of thick That's why you see it's dark you can't really see through it with the T E M. But what's happening is they're all reacting with lithium and the copper I mentioned before is a very fast diffuser in this system just like lithium actually. Well what's happening is it's more energetically favorable for the copper to diffuse together from all these particles and diffuse through the particles and then form a copper metal denge right that grows that's more energetically favorable than simply forming a bunch of little copper particles so what we see actually is this large copper didn't write that grows during lift the Asian process so this is actually you know this is obviously dynamic we're seeing this this copper metal then dry to grow out of this solid material so this is really weird to see the first time I saw it I mean unexpected definitely but it's only enabled by this interesting structural change and also the very high diffuse cities of copper in this material. So it's and it'll be interesting to compare this to the reaction of of copper sulphate with other alkali metals like sodium or potassium to see if the same the same kinetics and the same morphology changes hold. All right OK so in the last fifteen minutes or so I'm going to switch gears a little bit no longer talking about batteries but talking about a different letter chemical system and this is materials for solar fuels. So. So solar fuels fundamentally means we're going to absorb sunlight and create storable fuels either hydrogen or hydrocarbons one way to do this is actually to use semiconductors which we know can absorb sunlight like in a solar cell but instead of using them in a solar cell use the semiconductors to do electric chemistry so basically used to make it actors that absorb light and split water so the idea here is that theoretically Well theoretically you could make a simple and cheap solar fuels device using semiconductors that are doing electric chemistry. To split water this is the simple reaction of course you all know this you need gives free energy of one point two three electron volts to split water so this is rather high especially for a semiconductor system I mean most most solar cells. Single solar cells will produce between five to seven hundred millivolts So here we have one point two three volts that's required so this this complicates the situation a little bit. And I'll just mention hydrogen is useful fuel because it can be used regularly in fuel cells as many of you know of course but it can also be used to further process carbon monoxide and to and to store will fuels liquid fuels and so this could be a nice feedstock for renewable fuels that's why hydrogen is of interest. But this is a schematic of a solar fuels device so this is an original design that was invented at Cal Tech probably about a decade ago now but this basically contains two different semiconductor materials and you take this whole device and you actually dunk it in water that's how it operates. So the signatures are labeled photo anode photo cathode the photo and it is a larger bandgap semiconductors so it's a it can absorb U.V. light or near U.V. light the photo cathode is a smaller band gets I mean Dr you can have this membrane separator that's quite important actually in between so it separates the products and it also allows for ion transport. But the important reactions that are occurring as you're absorbing you're absorbing light in the photo anode semiconductor and so you have photo generated holes so you have excited holes charge carriers that move to the surface of the semiconductor and they react with water actually the holes react with water to oxidize water and they form oxygen so you have the oxygen evolution reaction happening here and the bottom semiconductor you have the hydrogen evolution reaction so the photo generated electrons move to the surface and they react with water to form hydrogen and so this is a totally contained for water splitting process where on the top electrode you're forming water or sorry you're forming oxygen you're of all the oxygen in the bottom bottom electrode you're of all the hydrogen and so there's a lot of details here will go into all the details but that's the important things that you need to know. Regarding the whole device. The the really big problem with these devices and with this whole field actually is that basically all samee actors are or many many similar actors are unstable and eight weeks environments and this is actually exacerbated when you when you shine a light on it because often the photo generated carriers like the holes are have a very high energy and they can actually corrode your material instead of doing the electrical history you want them to do and so photo anodes where that where the water oxidation happens they operate at the high potential and they are especially susceptible to photo corrosion because these put it holes can corrode the material itself so this is an example of what photographing looks like this is a photo current stability test so this is this is a semiconductor material it's dunked and it's actually a slightly basic or pretty basic solution and light is shown on and we're measuring the current that's evolved during water oxidation as a function of time and you can see first we start with about one point four million some similar squared and over the course of fifteen minutes we drop off to a very low value and so our performance is decreasing This is because the surface of the material is corroding away and we can verify that by looking at before and after images of this thin film this is a businessman a date actually it's a type of oxide semiconductor this is before and this is after we can see actually that we've lost the material here so this is an example of the photo corrosion process. So the you know the first thought would be OK So we have this we have these doctors who want to protect them underwater we want them to still you know retain their functionality how do we do that well the first thought would be I guess to try to put something else on top you're seeing a doctor right to protect it from corrosion that's rather an obvious thought actually I mean people been thinking about that for a long time maybe forty years but the problem is it's actually kind of difficult because there's a lot of requirements for these protection layers so they have to be resistant to corrosion first of all they have to be transparent they have to let light through. They also have to be conductive defo to generate a carry. And this can be a hard one because many many materials that are resistant to corrosion and transparent are are wideband oxides that are not conductive. They also have to be catalytic for the oxygen evolution reaction or the hydrogen evolution reaction depending on which one you're doing and so these are a lot of different fireman's And so there are some tradeoffs rights of the insulating oxides can be corrosion resistance and transparent but they're generally not conductive or electric catalytic So that's a problem. So basically we need to find the right material and the right fabrication process this is actually something that I started working on as a postdoc in conjunction with a number of other colleagues this is a Cal Tech and the Joint Center for artificial photosynthesis there. And so we basically developed a number of different ways to deposit very thin films and thicker films designed to protect the semiconductors from photo corrosion this is one example so this is using ultra thin ailed the protection layers this is a schematic so this is the green here is the semiconductor business fan today and I developed this dual ultra thin coating dual layer coating of titanium oxide which is deposited with atomic layer deposition and also Necco which is catalytic So we kind of. Taking apart the two functionalities. This was pretty promising this this coating allowed for an imp and increase in stability time from about you know ten minutes to two hours. But the electronic conduction process through these very thin layers is most likely a tunneling process so that's why we're able to conduct electrons to oxidize the water. But the problem with these very thin materials is then coatings that is there's always defects in pin holes and it's very difficult to get sustain stability over ten twenty one hundred thousand hours with these very thin coatings so moving towards thicker coatings that are very carefully processed. Is necessary. And so just briefly here. There are two different types of coatings that I've worked on and in conjunction with some other colleagues as well to different oxides both dioxide and nickel oxide that have shown very good performance and as as protective layers for photo electrodes for these water splitting devices basically have improved the stability of these electrodes now to unprecedented levels and so this is been really an important. Breakthrough basically in this field as not just me this done it's been probably ten to fifteen grad students and postdocs at Caltech in the working on this. So first talk about titanium dioxide. So basically what we're going to use silicon now is are semiconductor in type silicon this is a very easy material to work with it's probably many of you know and we deposit one hundred meters of amorphous such a name dioxide on the surface with atomic Lare deposition and then a very thin nickel layer as the catalyst layer this is kind of similar way just shows that this is much thicker than in dioxide and so we don't expect that tunneling will have any kind of. Effect here right we have to have some sort of conduct for that to for the photo generate characters other than tunneling what we see is when we test these devices so this is a letter chemical test of this electrode that's built up with this multilayer stack here. The details here on important but in the dark you see this is a standard catalytic electrode you see a catalytic turn on a current turn on at some point. This is the silicon electrode over here and we can see that we do have photo current that flows if anybody is familiar with photovoltaic curves I.V. curves we analyze these and basically the same way these foetal intros will get in the details there though what this plot shows is we do have a catalytic current that's due to the flowing we have this flowing and this is surprising initially because we expect we actually expected that this amorphous. I would completely. Be a blocking layer to the holes that are trying to flow through it but in fact we do get flow of current and we do a pretty good performance actually so another aspect of this is that the stability is very long so this is the stability of these photo electrodes that are oxidizing water and ph fourteen K. O. H. and you can see here that we're showing the photo career over one hundred hours and it is fairly stable these have been further tested over now to many hundreds of hours without any kind of degradation so as promising as a protective layer and it still allows for this current to flow which was initially quite puzzling. So to kind of just briefly mention some of the properties of this material so this is a T.M. image showing the amorphous T O two layer on top of silicon within a thin nickel layer on top which again is the the catalytic layer. And this is a high resolution image of the interface here the silicon interface there's always some silicon oxides interface which we actually think plays a role and developing the photo voltage but the interesting thing with this material is that we're actually well. I was going to want to show this because it's very complicated this is actually the band diagram this been mapped out using X. P.S. by my colleague here Hsu who. Basically has set of experiments allowed us to really understand how current was flowing through these materials by mapping out the band diagram but I'm going to show a little simplified version right because the other one was way too complicated so here we're looking at the end type silicon this is the material that's actually absorbing the light and the photo generated holes are being generated there. To the studio to layer sits right across the interface from silicon and the point is we want to get holes from the valence band of silicon through the T O two to the nickel so they can oxidize water so the question is how is this happening this question is not completely resolved unfortunately but there's a few options the first option is. Basically the holes can recombine with electrons and the conduction man that are coming from the water oxidation process. That's one option the second option is actually that the holes move through these mid gap states in the two This is a this is a controversial option I would say and there are ongoing experiments to discern whether this is actually happening if it is happening it's quite exciting because it could be a way that we could modify the bands structure of two to allow for you know different types of different energy energies of holes electrons to pass through but this is an ongoing process but fundamentally we do have conduction through the T O two and we think it's either through this conduction band mechanism or through a midcap States mechanism we have measured the big gap States with X P S of the techniques they are there and they're at this energy and this is significant they're about ten of the twenty percent per cent meter cubed is a pretty high density of admin get States but the actual could actually make it a mechanism as yet to be resolved. All right so. Nickel oxide is another protection layer. That's yet to was has been studied for a few years now and they're still we're still trying to understand exactly how the connections happening Nicol oxide happens to be actually better than T O two in terms of performance this is only discovered recently but one of the reasons why is because its properties are exactly what you want for these protection materials first of all as transparent as a high band gap it's also very stable alkaline environments even more stable than to tame oxide and some cases it's also P. type and so there's no question about how the holes are being transported through the material. And finally is catalytic for all we are so all these things together make it a very good protection layer. So here's the stability of a of a silicon electro that's been protected with nickel oxide and you can see here that we're going to more than a thousand hours. With very little current decay and so that's. Very promising performance. People at Cal Tech are now making full water splitting devices from these utilize these protective layers basically for for a performance that's basically never been seen before so it's pretty exciting. All right so I think I had this slide of that one more slide just to end up and sure enough time you have just a few more minutes so just in summary I talked about two different systems right we had battery systems and I talked a lot about how fundamental understanding of these reaction mechanisms of mechanical degradation has really actually greeted direct links between engineering. Nanostructures for better performance and in a lot of ways we wouldn't have been able to do that without these fundamental studies. And then also talked about water splitting and solar driven water splitting and how we can tailor interfaces and these materials in these devices for dramatically improve stability of performance so examples of two different systems so for the last slide I'll just talk a little bit about what my group here is working on so actually meant to graduate students are here in the room. Are my group here at Georgia Tech is focused on bridging material so this in-situ characterization and device performance and the letter chemical systems and as you can probably tell this follows directly from my previous work we're interested in a few different projects right now we've started a project on on tailoring interfaces in solid state electric chemical systems a lot of a lot of times interfaces in solid state systems like batteries are reactive and have to be tailored controlled for greater stability. I'm also quite interested in working on the scale in situ probes to understand Ledger chemical reactions in chemo mechanics and battery material so this goes beyond in situ D.M. which we're still doing but trying to correlate. Face transformations in structural changes across the length scales and. Systems is quite important I think it's really the next frontier. And finally we're working on a project related to ionic materials for resistive switching and this is kind of an esoteric application when it comes to electric chemistry but it's actually for nonvolatile switching and memories and resistive switching All right so. I like to thank everybody for your tension these are some of my previous coworkers and advisors my current group here at Georgia Tech and previous funding sources and also a little bit of current funding so that you very much for attention I'll take any questions there are any Thank you. Thank you. Yeah largest a rhesus Yeah probably about one point five zero History sis. But interestingly it has a lower history assist then than other conversion reactions and is thought to be due to the fact that copper has a very high diffusive eighty and the material. Has to do with me that's right that's right. So. There should be here. Next Tuesday. You little. Use. Like some sort of oxidized metal. Yeah yeah yeah yeah the question of the comment is that perhaps it could be more reversible to go to an oxidized metal in terms of the conversion reaction Yeah I think you're right about that manganese could be. Actually the useful I'm sure people have studied manganese oxide are making useful fires a conversion reaction Yeah. The problem with that is you'd have less capacity available because the capacity is driven by the change in the oxidation state more lithium you can put in right and so you'd be trading off maybe more reversibility for less capacity. Mercury and I yeah maybe so I don't know if I want that in my battery that. Is. Just. So at the interface. So. Yeah yeah that's a good comment Yeah definitely actually my colleagues have done some X. P.S. on that interface careful work to show that there definitely is a mixed silicon tame oxide I don't know about them on oxide but if that's been shown previously. Maybe you showed it. OK OK OK great thank you. What is the pressure size. One factor so it's driven by the fundamental nature of the of the volume expansion the reaction itself so in this in the crystalline silicon case. You had this sharp reaction front and you actually have an isotropic expansion so you have group more expansion in certain directions this driven by the crystal energy of the lattice. And because of that you have stress concentrations that are much higher and so you have a small critical fracture size in the amorphous case the critical factor size much larger because you have basically have lower stresses that evolve and that's just because of the way that the reaction works. Yeah I mean I'm officer can should be more popular so I think. In terms of. In terms of previous research that this been done most people have looked at Crystal and silicon just because it's easier to make usually and then a structure form but in terms of actual applications I think that manufacturers that are looking at Silicon in their batteries are definitely considering a more facility and because of its greater versatility. Like sodium or something yeah yeah that's definitely a large research area each different alkali I on that you use has its own serious challenges beyond just fracture right so so in this lithium silicon case we've gone from many many choices of materials to silicon and we've narrowed in on this last one of these last few problems which is the fracture mechanical the British in problem bigger Titian problem but if you go to if you go to sodium or magnesium ions as your battery as your active ion in your battery These are very young fields actually They've only started in the last few years and there are many many issues associated with that but there's a large research area many people are looking into that lots of work to be done in that area so. Yeah it's a great question so I didn't talk about that all at all I guess so it turns out that if you deal with the eight silicon no matter if it starts as a more facility in a crystalline silicon when you deal with the it it remains a more FAS Yeah so it always through cycling it remains amorphous so starting with crystalline silicon is not really a good idea. As it turns amorphous anyway and it stays amorphous but it turns and the way that people have studied this material in the past is that they've they've pretty much always used crystalline silicon in the last few years this is changed you know as this research has come out and as people have seen this but definitely amorphous is more reversible and also it retains that structure with cycling so. Yeah yeah so the electric field are you kind of asking about the specifics of the in situ experiment or just in general. Yeah so so in a normal battery the electric field is is generally pretty uniform because you have these parallel plates and you have a large surface area in my in situ experiments the electric field is highly concentrated because you have maybe a single man a wire and a counter electrode and you know a very small gap and so you can have very eyelet your fields. But in general in general one of the important things about these in situ experiments is that you always have to do some exit you experiments that maybe not will tell you the same things but they will give you some idea that what you're seeing in situ is actually relatable to a real battery so in all these cases we were we did exit you experiments to look at before and after transformations to ensure that what we were seeing was what would happen or what is similar to what happens in a real battery system so. Yeah yeah so it is a bit different than a real battery system but it's it's the only way that you can really do it and incited so. Well. I mean. How do you nationalize a yes so you apply a voltage Yeah yeah so just like a real battery you have an electric car a letter of material active electromechanical you bring them together there's an electrolyte of a tween and then inside the T.M. you apply a voltage the special sample holder allows you to apply a voltage. That. The beam Yeah yeah yeah so there are beam effects but they don't cause let the ation the beam effects could be controlled if you if you're under high magnification or these experiments you can actually see the material changing the main beam effects are that the lithium containing materials inside the T.M. are kind of unstable so if you zoom in they actually the lithium actually evaporates but basically all the images I showed with the silicon it was a man if occasion and if you did the experiment with the beam blanked you get the exact same transformations so that's a good way to test that so.