Experimental study of spray-formation processes in twin-fluid jet-in-crossflow at jet-engine operating conditions

Thumbnail Image
Tan, Zu Puayen
Zinn, Ben T.
Jagoda, Jechiel I.
Seitzman, Jerry M.
Genzale, Caroline L.
Lubarsky, Eugene
Associated Organizations
Supplementary to
The jet-in-crossflow (JICF) fuel-injection technique is widely applied in modern jet-engine fuel-air mixers to provide rapid fuel atomization and mixing. However, the “Classical” JICF places large amounts of fuel into the initial jet/spray’s recirculation zone and the wall boundary-layer, both of which can risk flashback and fuel-coking on the wall, particularly for next-generation jet-engines that will operate at increasingly higher pressures and temperatures. Twin-Fluid (TF) JICF, where streams of air are co-injected with the fuel jet into the crossflow, is being considered as a way to mitigate the Classical-JICF’s shortcomings. However, the TF-JICF is a nascent fuel-injection technique that is not well understood, especially at the high operating pressures of jet-engines. This dissertation reports an experimental investigation of TF-JICF where liquid Jet-A fuel was co-injected with pressurized nitrogen into a crossflow of air. The developed fuel sprays were characterized using shadowgraphy. The fuel-to-crossflow momentum-flux ratios were varied from J=5-40, the air-nozzles pressure-drops were varied from dP=0-150% of crossflow pressure, and the crossflow Weber numbers were varied from Wecf=175-1050. These operating conditions allowed us to obtain a dataset that is both comparable with near-atmospheric studies of TF-JICF in the literature and applicable to jet-engines. The results show that TF-JICF can be classified into four spray-formation regimes (i.e., Classical-JICF, Air-Assist JICF, Airblast JICF and Airblast Spray-in-Crossflow), each containing a unique set of spray characteristics and mechanisms. In the Air-Assist regime that spans dP≈3-13%, the injected air formed a protective air-sheath around the initial fuel jet, which inhibited the development of Rayleigh-Taylor waves and surface-shearing (i.e., disturbances created by the crossflow), thus reducing the near-wall fuel concentrations. Applying higher levels of dP transitioned the spray into the Airblast JICF regime, where the intensified fuel-air impingement and shearing generated new disturbances on the jet. These generally caused the near-wall regions to become repopulated with fuel droplets (i.e., counter-productive towards mitigating flashback and wall-coking). When dP was higher than 100%, the jet became completely atomized by air prior to encountering the crossflow, producing an “Airblast Spray-in-Crossflow”. The resulting spray-plume’s penetration became related to the combination of the fuel and air’s momentum-fluxes, where increasing dP caused increasing separation between the spray-plume and test-channel wall. This reduces the near-wall fuel concentrations and is beneficial towards fuel-air mixer design, although the required levels of dP for this regime is likely too high for practical jet-engine operation.
Date Issued
Resource Type
Resource Subtype
Rights Statement
Rights URI