Title:
Equality as an Issue in Designing Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies and Programs
Equality as an Issue in Designing Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies and Programs
Files
Authors
Cozzens, Susan E.
Authors
Person
Advisors
Advisors
Associated Organizations
Series
Collections
Supplementary to
Permanent Link
Abstract
Inequality is an important global challenge. Inequalities between countries are
growing. While some poor countries are rapidly expanding their economies, others are
stuck at a low level and the gap is therefore widening between countries. Inequality is
also growing within many countries, including affluent ones. Inequalities in basic needs
such as food and water violate human rights as identified by the international community.
An inequality is a barrier – a steep differential that someone must scale to achieve
his or her full potential. Human progress as a whole is therefore hampered by
inequalities, which keep our efforts from adding up to all they could. This happens
through vertical inequalities, differences between individuals and households generated
by the structure of the economy, and through horizontal inequalities, differences by
culturally-defined categories like gender, ethnicity, and religion.
Why talk about inequalities in the context of science, technology, and innovation
(STI) policies? On the one hand, STI policies link directly to basic needs, when they deal
with food, health, and the environment – all topics that are virtually universal on national
STI policy agendas. On the other hand, STI policies link indirectly to inequalities in
income when they affect the dynamics of economic growth. STI policy practitioners
think of their work as providing a public benefit, but any public intervention can
contribute to cumulative advantage if it is more accessible to the members of society who
have greater resources. Public interventions, including STI policies and programs, need
to be specifically designed to reach disadvantaged groups if they want to be
redistributive.
My colleagues and I distinguish three types of redistributive policies: (1) Pro-poor
policies aim to reduce poverty or alleviate its conditions. (2) Fairness policies work on
eliminating horizontal inequalities, e.g. by gender or race. (3) Egalitarian policies attempt
to reduce vertical inequalities, through economic activities that increase income for
people in the middle of the distribution. I illustrate each type here, drawing on a mix of
research, human resource, and innovation policies from the STI realm.
Sponsor
Date Issued
2008
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Working Paper