Title:
Investigating the roles of features and priming in visual search

dc.contributor.advisor Davis, Elizabeth T.
dc.contributor.author Hailston, Kenneth en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMember Corso, Gregory M.
dc.contributor.committeeMember Krishnankutty Sathian
dc.contributor.committeeMember Corballis, Paul
dc.contributor.committeeMember Rogers, Wendy A.
dc.contributor.department Psychology en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-26T18:14:46Z
dc.date.available 2009-08-26T18:14:46Z
dc.date.issued 2009-06-01 en_US
dc.description.abstract Identifying and locating specific objects amidst irrelevant, distracting items can be difficult when one is unsure of where, or even what, to look for. Priming the perceptual/cognitive system for specific features or objects is one way of helping observers to locate and identify target items (e.g., Grice&Gwynne, 1985; Laarni and Hakkinen, 1994). Past research has demonstrated that priming single features does indeed affect search performance (e.g., Hailston&Davis, 2006; Huang&Pashler, 2005). But, what happens when more than one feature is primed? Does priming two features result in better performance than priming only one? What about three features? How does feature priming compare to simply priming the entire object itself? The current research addressed these questions with a series of three visual search experiments. In the first experiment performance in simple feature search was compared against triple-conjunction search performance. Three prominent models of visual search were compared to see which best predicted actual performance. In the second and third experiments the effects of multiple feature priming on search accuracy were examined in a triple-conjunction search (Experiment 2) and a whole-object search (Experiment 3). Moreover, in Experiment 3 the effectiveness of whole-object primes were compared to multiple-features primes. Results show that none of the three models can accurately predict performance in all cases, suggesting some modification of each is necessary. Furthermore, valid primes resulted in performance benefits, and these benefits increased with the number of primed features. Finally, no performance costs of invalid priming were observed in the current experiments. en_US
dc.description.degree Ph.D. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/29731
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Priming effects en_US
dc.subject Visual search en_US
dc.subject Attention en_US
dc.subject Priming en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Visual discrimination
dc.subject.lcsh Visual perception
dc.subject.lcsh Expectation (Psychology)
dc.subject.lcsh Priming (Psychology)
dc.title Investigating the roles of features and priming in visual search en_US
dc.type Text
dc.type.genre Dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
local.contributor.advisor Davis, Elizabeth T.
local.contributor.corporatename College of Sciences
local.contributor.corporatename School of Psychology
relation.isAdvisorOfPublication 157e1ea5-ab0e-47af-9f3d-d9b7127d57b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 85042be6-2d68-4e07-b384-e1f908fae48a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 768a3cd1-8d73-4d47-b418-0fc859ce897d
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
hailston_kenneth_200908_phd.pdf.pdf
Size:
287.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: