Title:
How rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity. The case of innovation studies and business and management
How rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity. The case of innovation studies and business and management
| dc.contributor.author | Leydesdorff, Loet | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Nightingale, Paul | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Hare, Alice | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Rafols, Ismael | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Stirling, Andy | en_US |
| dc.contributor.corporatename | University of Sussex. SPRU : Science and Technology Policy Research | en_US |
| dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. Technology Policy and Assessment Center | en_US |
| dc.contributor.corporatename | Universiteit van Amsterdam. Amsterdam School of Communications Research | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-10T19:53:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-02-10T19:53:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-09-16 | |
| dc.description | Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2011 | en_US |
| dc.description | This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. ©2011 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This investigation compares the degree of interdisciplinarity and impact indicators of Innovation Studies Units and Business and Management Schools. The results illustrate the general disadvantage of interdisciplinarity in assessement, by showing how allegedly excellence-based journal rankings have a bias in favour of mono-disciplinary research, and how this negatively affects the assessment of interdisciplinary organisations. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | National Science Foundation, US | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1853/42449 | |
| dc.publisher | Georgia Institute of Technology | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | ACSIP11. General Papers | en_US |
| dc.subject | High-impact journals | en_US |
| dc.subject | Professional society published journals | en_US |
| dc.subject | Disciplinary-focused business schools | en_US |
| dc.subject | Interdisciplinary research | en_US |
| dc.subject | Disciplinary bias | en_US |
| dc.subject | Citation-count performance | en_US |
| dc.title | How rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity. The case of innovation studies and business and management | en_US |
| dc.type | Text | |
| dc.type.genre | Proceedings | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.contributor.corporatename | Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts | |
| local.contributor.corporatename | School of Public Policy | |
| local.relation.ispartofseries | Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | b1049ff1-5166-442c-9e14-ad804b064e38 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | a3789037-aec2-41bb-9888-1a95104b7f8c | |
| relation.isSeriesOfPublication | 8e93dc09-10dd-4fdd-8c5a-77defb1f7f78 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- 397-1464-1-PB.pdf
- Size:
- 1.33 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full Paper