Integrated Sizing and Multi-objective Optimization of Aircraft and Subsystem Architectures in Early Design

Files
_Aviation_2017__Integrated_Sizing_and_Multi_objective_Optimization_of_Aircraft_and_Subsystem_Archit.pdf (1.69 MB)
Author(s)
Rajaram, Dushhyanth
Chakraborty, Imon
Puranik, Tejas G.
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering
The Daniel Guggenheim School of Aeronautics was established in 1931, with a name change in 1962 to the School of Aerospace Engineering
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
Series
Collections
Research Publications
Supplementary to:
Permanent Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1853/62533
Abstract
The aerospace industry's current trend towards novel or More Electric architectures results in some unique challenges for designers due to both a scarcity or absence of historical data and a potentially large combinatorial space of possible architectures. These add to the already existing challenges of attempting to optimize an aircraft design in the presence of multiple possible objective functions while avoiding an overly compartmentalized approach. This paper uses the Integrated Subsystem Sizing and Architecture Assessment Capability to pursue a multi-objective optimization for a Large Twin-aisle Aircraft and a Small Single-aisle Aircraft using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II with parallel function evaluations. One novelty of the optimization setup is that it explicitly considers the impacts of subsystem architectures in addition to those of traditional aircraft-level design variables. The optimization yielded generations of non-dominated designs in which substantially electrified subsystem architectures were found to predominate. As a first assessment of the impact of epistemic uncertainty on the results obtained, the optimization was re-run with altered sensitivities for the thrust-specific fuel consumption penalties due to shaft-power and bleed air extraction. This analysis demonstrated that the composition of architectures on the Pareto frontier is sensitive to the secondary power extraction penalties, but more so for the Small Single-aisle Aircraft than the Large Twin-aisle Aircraft.
Sponsor
Date
2017-06
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Paper
Rights Statement
Rights URI