Exploring epistemological approaches to argumentation: from evaluation standards to the practice of argumentation

Hoffmann, Michael H. G.

Title:

Exploring epistemological approaches to argumentation: from evaluation standards to the practice of argumentation

dc.contributor.author	Hoffmann, Michael H. G.	en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename	Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Public Policy	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2008-08-12T13:00:12Z
dc.date.available	2008-08-12T13:00:12Z
dc.date.issued	2005-12-13
dc.description.abstract	The paper distinguishes, in its first part, different epistemological approaches to argumentation theory and criticizes those who focus on non-relative criteria of argument evaluation. The second part describes the basic idea of an alternative epistemological approach that focuses on improving the practice of argumentation by a representational tool called Logical Argument Mapping (LAM).	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1853/24057
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	Georgia Institute of Technology	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	School of Public Policy Working Papers ; 8	en_US
dc.subject	Argumentation theory	en_US
dc.subject	Logical argument mapping	en_US
dc.subject	LAM	en_US
dc.subject	Epistemological approaches to argumentation	en_US
dc.title	Exploring epistemological approaches to argumentation: from evaluation standards to the practice of argumentation	en_US
dc.type	Text
dc.type.genre	Working Paper
dspace.entity.type	Publication
local.contributor.corporatename	School of Public Policy
local.contributor.corporatename	Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts
local.relation.ispartofseries	School of Public Policy Working Papers
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication	a3789037-aec2-41bb-9888-1a95104b7f8c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication	b1049ff1-5166-442c-9e14-ad804b064e38
relation.isSeriesOfPublication	694a8923-35f2-4d0f-a418-8e46a8fd4e51