Exploring epistemological approaches to argumentation: from evaluation standards to the practice of argumentation
Files
Author(s)
Hoffmann, Michael H. G.
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Collections
Supplementary to:
Permanent Link
Abstract
The paper distinguishes, in its first part, different epistemological approaches to argumentation theory and criticizes those who focus on non-relative criteria of argument evaluation. The second part describes the basic idea of an alternative epistemological approach that focuses
on improving the practice of argumentation by a representational tool called Logical
Argument Mapping (LAM).
Sponsor
Date
2005-12-13
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Working Paper