Title:
Kinematic Effects of Sloped Surfaces on Shank Angle for Persons with Drop Foot

dc.contributor.author Carnahan, Kristin
dc.contributor.corporatename School of Applied Physiology
dc.contributor.corporatename College of Sciences
dc.contributor.corporatename College of Sciences
dc.contributor.corporatename School of Biological Sciences
dc.date.accessioned 2008-05-23T14:40:33Z
dc.date.available 2008-05-23T14:40:33Z
dc.date.issued 2008-04-09
dc.description Presented at a Special Seminar: MSPO Student Presentations on April 9, 2008 at the Coon Building, Room 250 en_US
dc.description Runtime: 21:35
dc.description.abstract Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) was introduced in 1961 by Liberson as an alternative to the Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) for treating drop foot. The common peroneal nerve can be stimulated to create dorsiflexion in the swing phase of walking and allow toe clearance of the affected limb. The most difficult aspect of this concept for functional use has been the control of stimulation timing. Dai introduced the concept of incorporating a tilt sensor in 1996. The tilt sensor can be calibrated so that a stimulation of the peroneal nerve will occur when the shank angle has reached its most positive value, which occurs at toe off. The stimulation can be reliably attained in this way if the shank angle at toe off is relatively consistent. On a flat surface, this has proven to work well (Stein 2006, Kim 2004, Weiler 1999) in devices with tilt sensors, such as the Walk Aide (Innovative Neurotronics). This study will examine the impact of a sloped surface on the shank angle and therefore on the reliability of the tilt sensor for stimulation control. If this maximum shank angle is reduced on an inclined or declined surface, a stimulation may not occur based on the tilt sensor input. The hypothesis is that a significant difference will exist between shank angle at toe off on inclined and declined surfaces when compared to the shank angle at toe off on a flat surface. Seven subjects were recruited from the Atlanta area who have unilateral drop foot and currently utilize a Walk Aide device. Shank angle at toe off was measured for each subject on three different surfaces using kinematic data from the Vicon motion analysis system. The three surfaces were flat, a 4.8 degree ramp, and a 9.6 degree ramp. Results indicate that the shank angle at toe off was significantly lower when walking up both ramps compared to the shank angle at toe off on the flat surface (p<0.05). No significant differences were found when walking down the ramps. When wearing the Walk Aide, preliminary observations indicate that a stimulation is less likely to occur on the inclined surfaces when compared to the flat or declined surfaces. en_US
dc.description.advisor Robert Gregor
dc.format.extent 21:35 minutes
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/21836
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries MSPO Student Presentations ; 2008
dc.subject Drop foot
dc.subject Dorsiflexion
dc.subject Peroneal nerve stimulation
dc.subject Sloped surfaces
dc.subject Tilt sensor
dc.subject Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) en_US
dc.title Kinematic Effects of Sloped Surfaces on Shank Angle for Persons with Drop Foot en_US
dc.type Moving Image
dc.type.genre Masters Project
dc.type.genre Presentation
dspace.entity.type Publication
local.contributor.corporatename College of Sciences
local.contributor.corporatename School of Biological Sciences
local.relation.ispartofseries Master's Projects
local.relation.ispartofseries Prosthetics and Orthotics Graduate Progam
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 85042be6-2d68-4e07-b384-e1f908fae48a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication c8b3bd08-9989-40d3-afe3-e0ad8d5c72b5
relation.isSeriesOfPublication 09b1c264-93da-4a60-8e57-4eecff715bc6
relation.isSeriesOfPublication a5eb8fcf-f60d-47ce-ba10-668ed019b518
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 6
Thumbnail Image
Name:
handout.pdf
Size:
70.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PDF Handout
Thumbnail Image
Name:
presesntation.pdf
Size:
355.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PDF Presentation
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
presesntation.ppt
Size:
5.34 MB
Format:
Microsoft Powerpoint
Description:
PowerPoint Presentation
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
carnahan.mp4
Size:
58.15 MB
Format:
MP4 Video file
Description:
Download Video
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
carnahan_videostream.html
Size:
1.01 KB
Format:
Hypertext Markup Language
Description:
Streaming Video
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections