Title:
Innovation Through Time

dc.contributor.author Bruland, Kristine en_US
dc.contributor.author Mowery, David C. en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename Universitetet i Oslo en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename Walter A. Haas School of Business (University of California, Berkeley) en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-30T16:55:58Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-30T16:55:58Z
dc.date.issued 2004
dc.description Proceedings of the the First Globelics Academy, Ph.D. School on National Systems of Innovation and Economic Development, Lisbon, Portugal 25 May - 4 June 2004. en_US
dc.description.abstract Most analysts of innovation emphasize the importance of a historical approach, with good reason. First, innovation is time consuming, based on conjectures about the future, and its outcomes typically are uncertain for long periods. Analysis of any innovation therefore requires an understanding of its history. Second, innovative capabilities are developed through complex, cumulative processes of learning. Finally, innovation processes are shaped by social contexts, as Lazonick has pointed out: “The social conditions affecting innovation change over time and vary across productive activities; hence theoretical analysis of the innovative enterprise must be integrated with historical study.” Historical patterns of innovation are characterized by complexity, reflecting the heterogeneous nature of economic activity, and diversity of processes of technology creation across sectors and countries. These characteristics make it problematic to construct overarching schemas of historical development. Nevertheless, some historians and analysts of innovation have developed taxonomies of epochs, often based on “critical technologies” that define whole periods of development. One form of this is the wave theory proposed by Schumpeter in Business Cycles, in which steam power drove the first industrial revolution, electricity the second industrial revolution, and so on. Other work that does not rely on wave theories also stresses the role of a small number of technologies in driving broader processes of economic growth. Although valuable, many of these frameworks overemphasize the importance of the allegedly critical technologies while slighting other areas of innovation and economic activity that are no less important. In what follows we challenge some of the historical discussions that stress the transformative effects of ‘critical innovations’. Instead, we emphasize the complex multisectoral character of innovation, and hence the need to take seriously the co-existence of a range of innovation modes, institutional processes, and organizational forms. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/43162
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Historical patterns of innovation en_US
dc.subject Innovation modes en_US
dc.subject Institutional processes en_US
dc.subject Organizational forms en_US
dc.title Innovation Through Time en_US
dc.type Text
dc.type.genre Proceedings
dc.type.genre Paper
dspace.entity.type Publication
local.contributor.corporatename School of Public Policy
local.contributor.corporatename Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts
local.relation.ispartofseries Globelics Academy
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a3789037-aec2-41bb-9888-1a95104b7f8c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b1049ff1-5166-442c-9e14-ad804b064e38
relation.isSeriesOfPublication 9b80d09b-b06b-466c-8d92-2dd56083cde2
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DavidMowery_2.pdf
Size:
102.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections