Title:
Scientific community, relationship between science and technology and the African predicament: Who is to blame and what can be done?
Scientific community, relationship between science and technology and the African predicament: Who is to blame and what can be done?
Authors
Diyamett, Bitrina D.
Authors
Advisors
Advisors
Associated Organizations
Series
Series
Collections
Supplementary to
Permanent Link
Abstract
As globalization gather momentum and innovation motor increasingly turning technology into
science, the concept of "Triple Helix" is gaining currency in many countries, especially the developed ones. Governments are increasingly becoming aware of the importance of the universities as strategic actors in national economic development given their strategic position in
new knowledge generations. The concept of Triple Helix is also currently being exported to
Africa, and as well gaining popularity. However, the concept presents a serious dilemma for the Scientific Community in Africa. The dilemma largely emanates from the fact that there is a system disconnect at the boundary of science, which is global in character, and technology that is local in nature. Scientific Communities in Africa, and the Universities in particular, seems to have been
caught in a dilemma between trying to be at the same level with the rest of the scientific community world wide, and responding to the governments' and donor pressures to be of service
to the local productive sector, which is at a much lower level technologically; and where the
popular notion of "Science in Society and Science for the Society" does not seem to hold.
This paper is an attempt to bring to the fore these dilemma. It discusses the behavior of the scientific
community world wide, the convergence between science and technology, especially in developed
economies, and the pressure on the African scientists to gear their scientific inquiries to solve local problems, at the same time required to publish in international referred journals as basis for
professional recognition and promotion. The paper concludes by an attempt to suggest how this
dilemma can best be addressed, including changing the way scientific research is currently being
funded.
Sponsor
Date Issued
2008-09
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Proceedings