Title:
Culture of Circulation
Culture of Circulation
dc.contributor.author | Ockman, Joan | |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. College of Design | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Architecture | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | University of Pennsylvania | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-12T19:40:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-12T19:40:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-03-31 | |
dc.description | Presented on March 31, 2017 at the 2017 Spring Symposium on Architecture, Phantasmagoria, and the Culture of Contemporary Capitalism in the Architecture Library, Architecture West Building, College of Design at Georgia Tech. | en_US |
dc.description | Session One | en_US |
dc.description | Joan Ockman is Distinguished Senior Lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania School of Design and Visiting Professor at Cooper Union School of Architecture. An architecture educator, historian, writer, and editor, she has edited Architecture Culture 1943-1968, The Pragmatist Imagination, and Out of Ground Zero. She is currently completing a collection of essays titled Architecture Among Other Things, to be published next year by Actar. | en_US |
dc.description | Runtime: 26:29 minutes | |
dc.description.abstract | Once upon a time, in the days when modern architecture was young, circulation through a building was primarily a functional problem. By the mid-twentieth century, when the monument building morphed into the spectacle-building, the circulation system began to take on aesthetic implications of its own and to become a central feature of a building’s architectural identity. Think of Wright’s Guggenheim Museum or Saarinen’s TWA Terminal. Of course, Baroque architects already appreciated the expressive potential of dynamic scenography four centuries ago. But today the mania for circulation spaces manifest in cutting-edge architecture goes well beyond formal virtuosity. Escalators, ramps, elevators, stairs, bridges, catwalks—these privileged elements of contemporary buildings not only belong to a form-making culture that at all costs (figuratively and literally) wishes to avoid the appearance of fixity, but emanate from the very structure of the neocapitalist imaginary. In this talk we attempt an allegorical reading of architecture’s “culture of circulation.” What are the implications of an architecture that is about circulation? | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 26:29 minutes | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1853/58088 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Georgia Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Architecture, Phantasmagoria, and the Culture of Contemporary Capitalism Symposium | en_US |
dc.subject | Architecture | en_US |
dc.subject | Circulation | en_US |
dc.title | Culture of Circulation | en_US |
dc.type | Moving Image | |
dc.type.genre | Lecture | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.corporatename | College of Design | |
local.relation.ispartofseries | Architecture, Phantasmagoria, and the Culture of Contemporary Capitalism Symposium | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | c997b6a0-7e87-4a6f-b6fc-932d776ba8d0 | |
relation.isSeriesOfPublication | 1772f006-c348-4c8d-91fe-01da38e6c249 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 3.13 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: