Title:
General Intelligence Explained (Away)

dc.contributor.author Conway, Andrew R. A.
dc.contributor.corporatename Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Psychology en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename Claremont Graduate University. School of Social Science, Policy and Evaluation en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-01T14:38:54Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-01T14:38:54Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03-18
dc.description Presented online on March 18, 2021 at 11:00 p.m. en_US
dc.description Andrew Conway is a professor of cognitive psychology in the Division of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences at Claremont Graduate University. Conway’s research is aimed at understanding individual differences in intelligence and working memory capacity.
dc.description Runtime: 65:41 minutes
dc.description.abstract For more than a century, the standard view in the field of human intelligence has been that there is a “general intelligence” that permeates all human cognitive activity. This general cognitive ability is supposed to explain the positive manifold, the finding that intelligence tests with different content all correlate. However, this interpretation does not sit well with findings from cognitive psychology and neuroscience that point to the domain-specific modular fractionation of cognition. In my research talk I will present an alternative interpretation - process overlap theory - a new theoretical framework for the study of individual differences in cognitive ability (Conway & Kovacs, 2013; 2015; Kovacs & Conway, 2016; 2019). The theory assumes that most forms of complex cognition, and IQ test items, require a number of domain-general as well as domain-specific processes. Domain-general processes involved in executive attention are central to test performance. That is, they are activated by a large number of test items, alongside with domain-specific processes tapped by specific types of tests only. Such an overlap of executive processes explains the positive manifold as well as the hierarchical structure of cognitive abilities and rejects the notion of a general mental ability. As a consequence of the theory, IQ is redefined as an emergent formative construct rather than a reflective latent trait. This implies that IQ should be interpreted as an index of specific cognitive abilities rather than the reflection of an underlying general cognitive ability. The consequences of this new approach will be discussed, including a focus on specific abilities rather than on global measures of cognitive performance. en_US
dc.format.extent 65:41 minutes
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/64413
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Psychology Colloquium
dc.subject Cognition en_US
dc.subject Intelligence en_US
dc.subject Psychology en_US
dc.title General Intelligence Explained (Away) en_US
dc.type Moving Image
dc.type.genre Lecture
dspace.entity.type Publication
local.contributor.corporatename College of Sciences
local.contributor.corporatename School of Psychology
local.relation.ispartofseries School of Psychology Colloquiua
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 85042be6-2d68-4e07-b384-e1f908fae48a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 768a3cd1-8d73-4d47-b418-0fc859ce897d
relation.isSeriesOfPublication da9098fa-29c9-4bda-a0d0-bb2f2a5f2bd0
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
conway.mp4
Size:
278.58 MB
Format:
MP4 Video file
Description:
Download Video
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
conway_videostream.html
Size:
1.32 KB
Format:
Hypertext Markup Language
Description:
Streaming Video
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
transcript.txt
Size:
52.43 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Transcription
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thumbnail.jpg
Size:
37.71 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Description:
Thumbnail
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.13 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections