Title:
Are tropical plants better defended? Palatability and defenses of temperate vs. tropical seaweeds

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author Bolser, Robin C. en_US
dc.contributor.author Hay, Mark E. en_US
dc.contributor.corporatename University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Institute of Marine Sciences en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-02-03T21:11:02Z
dc.date.available 2011-02-03T21:11:02Z
dc.date.issued 1996-12
dc.description DOI: 10.2307/2265730
dc.description © Ecological Society of America en_US
dc.description.abstract Investigators working in both terrestrial and marine systems hypothesize that prey defenses are better developed in tropical than in temperate habitats because tropical consumers are more active and diverse. To investigate the hypothesis that chemical defenses are more potent in tropical than in temperate seaweeds, we conducted 38 feeding assays involving seven genera of algae. We offered tropical and temperate sea urchins the choice of a temperate alga from North Carolina or a closely related tropical alga from the Bahamas. Plants were freeze—dried, ground to a fine powder, embedded in agar, and presented in congeneric pairs (North Carolina species vs. Bahamian species), or same—species pairs, to the temperate urchin Arbacia punctulata and the tropical urchin Lytechinus variegatus. For the genera we tested (the red alga Amphiroa, the green alga Udotea, and the brown algae Dictyopteris, Dictyota, Lobophora, Padina, and Sargassum), we documented a general pattern in which the mean amount of North Carolina seaweeds eaten was approximately twice that of their Bahamian congeners. Dictyota was an exception to the overall pattern, in that mean consumption of temperate and tropical species was equivalent. In addition to showing a latitudinal difference in seaweed palatability, we found that some species exhibited significant, between—population variation in herbivore resistance on a local scale. The most notable example was Dictyota menstrualis from North Carolina. When collected from a shallow inshore site, this species was significantly more palatable than tropical species of Dictyota in four of six contrasts. When collected from a deeper offshore site, it was significantly less palatable than the tropical species in four of six contrasts. Thus, for this species, the between—population variance in palatability within a geographic region (North Carolina) bracketed the variance in palatability that we found among species and between regions. Feeding assays with both temperate and tropical urchins produced similar results, indicating that choices were made based on fundamental characteristics of the algae rather than on greater familiarity with local prey species. To see if chemical defenses could explain the differences in herbivore resistance that we noted using freeze—dried algae, we tested the effects of lipid—soluble and water—soluble extracts from each alga on urchin feeding by incorporating extracts into a standard palatable food. We also measured protein content and percent ash—free dry mass of the seaweeds in order to correlate urchin feeding preferences with these measures of food quality. Lipophilic chemical extracts explained urchin preferences in 9 of 15 (60%) North Carolina—Bahamas contrasts. Water—soluble extracts, protein content, and percent ash—free dry mass generally did not account for feeding patterns seen in the original assays. Our results support the general hypothesis that tropical seaweeds have stronger chemical defenses than temperate seaweeds. For some genera, however, smaller—scale local variability in herbivore resistance within a species can be as striking as overall latitudinal differences. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bolser, Robin C., and Mark E. Hay. 1996. Are Tropical Plants Better Defended? Palatability and Defenses of Temperate vs. Tropical Seaweeds. Ecology 77:2269–2286. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.2307/2265730
dc.identifier.issn 0012-9658
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/36812
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.publisher.original Ecological Society of America
dc.subject Algae en_US
dc.subject Arbacia en_US
dc.subject Chemical defenses en_US
dc.subject Dictyota en_US
dc.subject Geographic patterns en_US
dc.subject Plant-herbivore interactions en_US
dc.subject Sea urchin en_US
dc.subject Seaweeds en_US
dc.subject Temperate vs. tropical en_US
dc.title Are tropical plants better defended? Palatability and defenses of temperate vs. tropical seaweeds en_US
dc.type Text
dc.type.genre Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
local.contributor.author Hay, Mark E.
local.contributor.corporatename College of Sciences
local.contributor.corporatename School of Biological Sciences
relation.isAuthorOfPublication f3c1eedd-ee9e-4723-b2d5-c793a79b0bbf
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 85042be6-2d68-4e07-b384-e1f908fae48a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication c8b3bd08-9989-40d3-afe3-e0ad8d5c72b5
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sch_biol_hay_0098.pdf
Size:
2.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Publications