Lunar Module Descent Mission Design

Author(s)
Wilhite, Alan W.
Tolson, Robert
Moen, Marina M.
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering
The Daniel Guggenheim School of Aeronautics was established in 1931, with a name change in 1962 to the School of Aerospace Engineering
Series
Supplementary to:
Abstract
Various lunar descent trajectories were analyzed that include the optimization of the Apollo constrained mission trajectory, a fully optimized minimum energy trajectory, and a optimal, constrained trajectory using current instrumentation technology. Trade studies were conducted to determine the impacts of mission assumptions, pilot in the loop/automated flight demands, and additional constraints for the present recurring missions to the same outpost landing site. For mission design at this conceptual phase of the program, the Apollo pre-mission planning was applied to account for known contingencies (hardware, instrumentation known uncertainties) and unknown unknowns. The mission Delta-V's are presented in a risk form of conservative, nominal, and optimistic range where 90 percent of Delta-V is derived by trajectory analysis and the other 10 percent was derived from a qualitative analysis from Apollo 11 pre-mission planning. The recommendations for the Delta Vs are the following: conservative (Apollo derived) (2262 m/s), nominal (2053 m/s), and optimistic (1799 m/s). Because of the qualitative nature of the results, the degree of autonomy assumed, additional safety considerations for a lunar outpost, and the impact of advanced instrumentation, more in-depth analyses are required to refine the present recommendations.
Sponsor
Date
2008-08
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Paper
Rights Statement
Unless otherwise noted, all materials are protected under U.S. Copyright Law and all rights are reserved