Title:
Investigation of Transonic Drag Computations in Aerodynamic Preliminary Analysis System (APAS)

Thumbnail Image
Author(s)
Miller, Jeff
Authors
Advisor(s)
Olds, John R.
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering
The Daniel Guggenheim School of Aeronautics was established in 1931, with a name change in 1962 to the School of Aerospace Engineering
Supplementary to
Abstract
The Aerodynamic Preliminary Analysis System (APAS) is often used in conceptual design studies due to its low process times and relatively good results. APAS is actually a front end to two separate analysis codes, Unified Distributed Panel (UDP) and Hypersonic Arbitrary Body Program (HABP). APAS uses UDP to analyze subsonic and supersonic runs, and HABP to analyze hypersonic runs. Concern exists over the process by which APAS calculates transonic drag. It is common knowledge that an aircraft or spacecraft encounters a drag rise as is approaches the sound barrier, which then tapers off again once the vehicle has gone supersonic. This drag rise begins around a Mach number of 0.86, which is why most of today’s passenger planes travel at or below that speed. Computer programs have been written that achieve transonic drag results equivalent to those observed in wind tunnels and drop tests. The manner in which APAS calculates drag in the transonic regime, and the accuracy of these results was the focus of this project. It was shown that APAS deals with transonic drag rise through the addition of a wave drag term to the overall drag coefficient. Wave drag is caused by shock waves and shock-induced separation. The method by which APAS calculates wave drag was determined and compared to another code called WAVDRAG, which was also written at NASA Langley. The two programs differ slightly in that WAVDRAG calculates zero-lift wave drag, and APAS includes wave drag due-to-lift in it’s calculations. It was then shown that neither WAVDRAG nor APAS calculate wave drag if the freestream Mach number is less than 1.0. This yields incorrect transonic drag results, as the drag rise should begin sub-sonically. However, for the purposes of APAS, the approximation is probably “close enough.” The investigation was initially performed on six simple wing- body configurations, each of which was analyzed in APAS and WAVDRAG. APAS results from the UDP analysis of three reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) designed by the Space Systems Design Lab at Georgia Tech were also examined in order to find consistency between theoretical wing-body configurations and configurations resulting from real-world applications of APAS. Finally, a simple modification was done to one of the configurations, resulting in lower wave drag
Sponsor
Date Issued
2002-04-26
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Masters Project
Rights Statement
Unless otherwise noted, all materials are protected under U.S. Copyright Law and all rights are reserved