Comparison of Cascade, Lattice, and Parallel Filter Architectures

Thumbnail Image
Files
cope_337.pdf (650.27 KB)
Author(s)
Patnaik, Rohit
Vandrasi, Vivek
Madsen, Christi K.
Eftekhar, Ali Asghar
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
Series
Collections
Research Publications
Supplementary to:
Permanent Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1853/45265
Abstract
We examine the use of different high-level filter architectures (cascade, lattice, and parallel). We discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and we present simulation results and filter-tolerance tests. This information serves as a useful comparative analysis in the selection of a high-level filter architecture for a particular problem. The sensitivity to nonlinearity is also evaluated as resonance-enhanced power in the feedback path. For narrowband band-pass responses, cascade architectures appear to be more tolerant to filter parameter variations than lattice architectures and are substantially more efficient than parallel architectures
Sponsor
Date
2010-12
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Article
Rights Statement
Rights URI