The Conditional Equivalence of ΔV Minimization and Apoapsis Targeting in Numerical Predictor-Corrector Aerocapture Guidance

Author(s)
Lafleur, Jarret M.
Advisor(s)
Editor(s)
Associated Organization(s)
Organizational Unit
Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering
The Daniel Guggenheim School of Aeronautics was established in 1931, with a name change in 1962 to the School of Aerospace Engineering
Series
Supplementary to:
Abstract
Interest in aerocapture, a maneuver in which a spacecraft dives into the atmosphere of a planet for nearly propellantless capture into planetary orbit, has grown steadily in recent years. One key element required to execute this maneuver is an appropriate guidance algorithm for the atmospheric phase of flight. A popular algorithm choice has been the numerical-predictor corrector (NPC), which typically iterates on a time-invariant bank angle to target apoapsis of the desired final orbit. This paper introduces the idea of using the NPC to select the bank angle that instead minimizes the sum of periapsis-raise ΔV and apoapsis-cleanup ΔV, and demonstrates the surprising finding that the two approaches are equivalent under a certain analytic condition. This condition is derived and then applied to correctly predict a scenario in which apoapsis targeting produces a suboptimal ΔV. This scenario is simulated, and the ΔV minimization algorithm is shown to reduce the required ΔV by 23%. Monte Carlo simulations confirm both the scenarios of equivalence and non-equivalence, and an automatable procedure is outlined that a user can execute prior to simulating or flying a trajectory to determine whether apoapsis targeting is ΔV optimal or whether a ΔV minimization algorithm is required.
Sponsor
Date
2011-08
Extent
Resource Type
Text
Resource Subtype
Paper
Rights Statement
Unless otherwise noted, all materials are protected under U.S. Copyright Law and all rights are reserved