Quests. OK. It was should start with questions and then we'll see if we have time for my presentation. Well we can always change it's the last one right you can change up so so let me start. By sort of just telling you a little bit about what the rehabilitation Engineering Research Center. Program is about. And where we fit into that So this is a five year grant and there are eighteen centers similar centers on different topics around the country they're funded for five years four and a half million dollars give or take they go up and down a little each year in terms of the awards but somewhere around four and a half million dollars for the five years. They are used to be funded by the National Institute on Disability and rehabilitation research as Dr Greenlee said however in the in the fall they were actually moved they used to be in the Department of Education and they were moved into the Department of Health and Human Services. Into the administration for community living so actually for lo these many years that I've been doing work for for the agent for this particular agency they were in the Department of Education in everybody go well you know it's a national institute aren't they in the National Institutes of Health what's going on and so they finally although not in the National Institutes of Health or at least in Department of Health and Human Services which is the kind of research that they actually fund and I think a much better place for them now. Ever in doing this they actually added independent living to their name so now their acronym used to which used to be nighter is now a Needler. Which is kind of strange. The mission of our center as opposed to the other seventeen centers and I also would should tell you that of those eighteen centers three of them were are currently a Georgia Tech one of them is ending up Stephens Froogle has a center and Tia that's just finishing up there's also an on his on will mobility there is one that's run out of the Center for Advanced Communication policy which is on wireless technologies and Previously we had one on workplace accommodations so of the limited number of centers Georgia Tech has had four which is pretty amazing considering that we don't have a clinical program and I believe we're the only school that has any of these centers without a clinical program so the mission of this interest to conduct interdisciplinary rehabilitation engineering research and development and we have built Taishan engineering in and of itself is pretty broad it encompasses not just engineering but design and technology. Interdisciplinary is important and I'll talk a little bit more about that on the next slide and the goal is to increase knowledge about availability of an access to affective universally design technologies. Universal Design is an important component of what we do it's been a component in all the work that I do and it's gradually finding its way into into the other already or sees as well and it's to enable people to sustain independence maintain health safely engage in basic AG. It is of daily living at home in the community and participate in society so it's not just doing stuff it's also being able to engage in social roles but the important thing for us is as people age with disability and I'll also give talk a little bit more about our space and how we differ from other ageing grants and disability grounds. So interdisciplinary interdisciplinary is important because it solves problems you can solve diverse problems that people have in the in using the environment as they get older and with disability if you don't have an interdisciplinary approach and what we've done is we've sort of spread this out around campus certainly the College of Architecture and. In the School of Design the Center for graphic information systems sucrose here in the alternative media accessibility Center which is also part of the College of Architecture. Those are the four components in the college that are part of this but we also. Have researchers involved from the College of sciences particularly psychology and in fact my two kopi eyes on the grant. When you Rogers and Tracy Mitzna are both in psychology so the three of us. Are part sort of overseas or Graham. The college of engineering we have biomedical engineering and mechanical College of computing the. H.C.I. program i Pad at the Institute for people in technologies and within i Pad There's the Interactive Media Technology Center and there where home are part of this grant Georgia Tech. Human Research Institute human factors like the Emory Center for Health and Ageing in the College of Sciences and Engineering University. South Carolina and there are some other players that have. Also have some other consultant roles but by and large you can see that both across Georgia Tech and Emory Medical School we have a pretty diverse group of individuals working on. This center. And the center is basically a house to house for different projects to to occur and so there are three research projects and in those three research projects there are actually a couple of sub projects so all told there's really five different projects but when you submit something to the review panel only look at the scope of work that says you've got to you know all these five projects and you've got all this other stuff it's too much so you try and you know make it look like it's a smaller scope of work by saying we only have three research projects and I'll show you how they all nest. To do that and then similarly in development we have three development projects which also have a couple of sub projects and three training projects so that three three and three looks really good when you're writing it it's symmetrical. Let me talk a little bit of al before I tell you about the projects that we're doing let me tell you about sort of where we see our space what why we're different and then other projects and why we're doing different research than other people are doing either in disability and aging This is a graphic that that sort of in development this is the first iteration of it we've been tweaking it so we're trying to fit a lot of stuff in here but let me run through it and show you what I'm talking about so on the top person context and fit is really a German to logical approach to to environment and aging it comes out of psychology in general. And basically low. The interaction between the person the environment and the context and the performance that is the fit between the two that allows you to engage in activity and participate in society that goes back into the one nine hundred seventy S. But more recently the World Health Organization developed a back in about twelve years ago thirteen years ago developed a model called the International classification of functioning disability and health which looks at the interaction of body structure that is your physical body the function that is what you can do to your abilities based on your physical body. The interaction of that and the environment in terms of either barriers or facilitators to your to your performance of activities and your participation in society so in traditional research we're looking at impairment that is a limit that is something that goes wrong with the body or in body function or structure or body structure rather or we look at age related changes that is this ability research at the top and Aging Research at the bottom this ability research would be sort of the night or an aging research would be in the National Institute on Aging because one's looking at disability one's looking at aging So what happens is that you have a person that has some some impairment or limitation in body structure which. When that person tries to interact with the environment may encounter a barrier if they encounter a barrier that they can't that they can't get through it ends up in disability so people with impairments don't don't necessarily have a disability they only have a disability when there's a barrier in the environments. Disability is this interaction in the of itself impairment doesn't mean that you are disabled or in and of itself an age related change such as a limitation in vision or hearing or mobility doesn't necessarily mean you have a disability only if you can't interact successfully with the environment if you can't find a facilitator. So similarly if you can match up with a facilitator. Regardless of your impairment or your age related change you might have successful performance the difference between successful performance within the same body function and structure and limitation is your environment. Alternatively what we're really looking at is what happens when you have an impairment and you have an age related change so it's not just about I'm getting older and I have I have lower body impairment or I have a vision impairment it's what happens if I have a vision impairment or or a motor impairment and I have age related changes on top of that so that my vision impairment I now have a mobility limitation. So as we get older we lose function. Beyond the the where our impairment is and now we're looking at the additive affects of things it's no longer this sort of singular and pure homogeneous kind of functioning but it's this interaction between. An additive affects of age on top of an impairment so similarly you now have multiple limitations not just a singular him limitation and again when you meet up with a barrier. You that you can't get. Through or can interact with you end up with disability However what also happens is things that used to be facilitators now come barriers so now it's harder to find a facilitator because things that were facilitators before are now barriers. So in order to have successful performance you need to find a facilitator that a work so the difference between that's the difference between what we're doing down here and the either or of what's going on pretty much in the rest of the disability research and development world and the aging research and development world so all of the projects that we're engaged in are looking at people who are aging with some sort of impairment and are overlaying the effects of age related changes that have caused them to. Have a disability. So in our research activities we've got three research projects identifying user needs the effects of hearing loss on mobility and participation of people aging with vision disability or vision impairment and tell wellness technologies. The first one actually is the one that has three you know three cell projects in it so they're all looking at identifying user needs Wendy Rodgers in psychology is the principal investigator over the whole are one project. And the purpose of the R one projects are to provide a needs based scientific foundation that is necessary for effective technology integration into the lives of older adults with disabilities so because this is a new space and there isn't a whole lot of research with the these particular. Populations that we're looking at of people with impairments aging and having age related changes we sort of in a lot of ways have to go back to square one and understand what's the difference between our user population. And the impairment or disability or sorry or age related changes populations. So the first sub project is to. Develop a taxonomy of everyday support needs that is providing an evidence base for attacks on a me of needs in the performance of everyday activities among people with hearing vision or mobility disability and stratified by functional loss so really trying to understand what's going on with these individuals in their daily lives as they gauge in activities in their own. This is. They've been developing a registry of individuals that within this project. Too that will feed forward into some other projects but basically collecting a lot of functional data on a lot of people to try and understand sort of what their needs are and in order to target our future research projects. The second so projects aging with mobility impairment. Understanding the challenges in the home is identifying home based user needs of older adults with long term mobility impairment so here we're focusing on just mobility impairment and looking at the environmental challenges that people have and exploring the impact of age related changes on on these individuals on bed transfer bathing showering toileting food preparation and home mobility and they're using they so if a multi method approach by doing questionnaires. People with with who are using different technologies and and then doing a observations based approach to understand the day in the life experience so asking them to go through asking people to go through a protocol of doing things and then observing them and trying to pack the. Person environment fit problems that are out there having. The third project under. Under user needs is an integrated we have engineering research data set to predict task performance and technology needs and simply what this is is trying to pull together all of the research data coming out of. Out of this user needs project from the other sub projects as well as our other projects that we're developing or that we're working on and collecting the same functional performance data for individuals in the same biomechanical and from metric data and demographic data shoving it all and matching it up into one big database and trying to look for correlations between. Between all of these different factors and techno and task performance so that we can be able to look at what predicts task performance and task for Mr Klein so that we can intervene before proactively rather than retroactively because when it's retroactive then people go through this period of well I can't do what I used to do and they can't do it so they don't question is if we can in a intervene proactively then people can transition through their functional declines but still be able to engage in activities. And I think there are actually a couple of A. Other projects you'll hear the same thing about being able to predict performance in order to modify the environment the second research project is affects of hearing loss on mobility of people aging with vision disabilities so here we're looking at people who have been who have a vision loss vision disability or vision impairment long term and they people who use sound based systems technology devices for sonic example sonic canes or sound based G.P.S. who have maybe function perfectly well. In the environment in getting around now or losing their hearing and they can't use the same technologies that they've been using similarly they've developed compensatory strategies using auditory spatial cues sound from cars even asking for directions and if you can no longer interact that way how do you get around in the environment so the idea here is to observe people. In the community have them go through. Three routes to find the following directions and understanding the problems that they're having using the sound based technologies that they're in and strategies that they have current that they've been using in order to understand and identify new ways of providing information to these individuals. So it's basically describing the impacts of hearing loss on mobility and the usability of their of their strategies in assistive technology. Identifying the auditory characteristics and strategies that predict mobility performance and developing invalidating guidelines for the. For the integration of new cell based technologies or sound based cues into both training of individuals with vision loss as they age as well as increasing the effectiveness of assisted technologies. The last research project. Which is tele wellness technologies is actually sort of this multifaceted project to understand barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of tell of technologies by older adults for. For use in Intel or wellness that is in this particular case it's using it for exercise interventions but looking at different technologies that could be used to have a group exercise intervention remotely for example on the next slide. Actually you can't really see it because it's way over there there's a little it's a picture of. A veto robot correct although we don't have a vehicle robot anymore we now have double robots basically it's a it's a remote controlled i Pad that you can move around on wheels the idea here is to basically look at the barriers of facilitators to the acceptance of these technologies find the one that's that we think is going to work best. Develop an exercise intervention implement it and look at the use of the of the robot and how easy it is to use and how well older adults can can use this kind of technology in a remote social atmosphere so people. Exercising in their own homes but collaborating or doing it together. Synchronously through the use of this kind of technology. It's just in there and go it's just. What I need is a remote control for my for my technology like a robot and it could just move around. I'd rather watch. So there are also three development projects so the difference between research in the development is simply that the goal of the research is information that could be used in development in the future the goal of development is something tangible a product something literally you can hold in your hand there is research involved in the development there's development involved in the research but it's what's the what's the purpose alternately what's the outcome what are we going to get out of it. So each of these projects we've got something coming out the first one is the ageing and disability innovation garden which really is about app development the second one is smart bathroom technologies and the third one is the mobile manipulator robot and I'll tell you a little bit more about all of these so like our first research project project our first development project has three sub projects really what this is about is. Is developing apps and what we've done is we've seeded it with three projects over the first three years that. We sort of knew there was a need for based on prior research and our expertise and the idea is that over two and a half years of the last two and a half years of the grant we're going to try and identify new apps that we might be able to fund so. We set aside some money out of our budgets for the last two and a half years of the grant to be able to find new projects that might be appropriate for aging with disability and be able to bring those to fruition and through additional funding. When you get to the last training project that I talk about I'll talk about how those two things can happen. So the first project is inaccessible cognitive training through Universal Design and this is actually very best in the Coleman who is in a reactive Media Technology Center actually had developed an application for older adults a gaming out for cognitive training and what we're doing is taking this to the next level and saying OK well not just cognitive training how can we make it universal How can we make sure that all older adults with disabilities can be able to use this out so they're really really creating interfaces in inputs and outputs so that people can use the more gaming app is more usability so trying to take the worst case in order to start with rather than older adults with disabilities to undergrad college students and to see how well the app worked after they did some tweaking for to it and basically found that pretty much they did five undergrads in a quick and dirty test and found them you know for the most part other than. And that they wanted more animated figures it worked pretty well so working pretty well for a user group that you would expect it to work for. At least gives us the first sort of step towards taking your two. To a to a user group that might be more difficult typically in research we do that uses. If you start with the hardest case and it doesn't work you're sort of dead in the water because you have no clue how to make it better so if you start with the best case and you know it can work with the best case you can at least know it works for somebody and you can work your way up to the hardest case. The second project which I'm doing with super zero in in the C.G.I. center is to develop an app for locational intelligence and geospatial navigation which is a fancy way of saying we want to develop an application for route planning. And for older adults who had been able to get around even with a disability or an impairment for a long time when they start losing their ability there are other abilities it may be more difficult so for people with ambulatory disabilities who needed Kirk and. And float and shallow slopes now may have difficulty getting around because of their vision loss because they can't see where the barriers are and they can't see where the facilitators are like an island or refuge island in the middle of the road and they stop going out and they stop. Going out into the community and they become more homebound So the idea here is to develop an app that will give them the information that they need in order to get around beyond the information. They needed before. And they probably already know in terms of what was facilitating their mobility limitation and what we do is we came up with a list and I can remember was like fifty some odd parameters that might be relevant to community mobility and our goal here wasn't to say this is what makes it accessible most of the accessibility apps that are out there determine for the individuals what success of all so there's no curb cut it's not accessible Well if you have a vision loss and you know you don't necessarily need a curb cut so what successful for one person and usable for one person is there for and then another person so what we did was we said OK let's take all the stuff that might be relevant to anybody put it into this app and then find out what. At least prioritize what people need or want and then you know we can lead them customize the app for whatever they needed so we did some preliminary testing and found out what the key issues were for for our population and that way we can then sat at least the defaults but they can go in and change them so that the idea is that they can choose their usability they can choose where they get information by vibration in audio in addition to text. They can choose their essential parameters and then they can choose a set of secondary parameters so that it's all based on what they want or they need not just necessarily what or not what somebody else determines for you what you need and then basically you set the parameters. And you can. Find a group and when the route doesn't qualify all your parameters the app will tell you what the problems are and then you can choose that route. An alternative route that may have. Maybe more to your to your needs or wants at a particular time. The last step is mobility you have to measure gauge speed gauge speed has been shown to be. An incredibly accurate predictor of morbidity and mortality. While we're our population is not about morbidity and mortality it is about predicting activity decline so what we want to be able to do is to come up with a way of measuring gait speed accurately not just with a stopwatch. And cost effective in order to be able to do this both in the home and clinical settings and this is our project that Brian Jones who is the director of Aware Home is doing with the Center for Health and Ageing at Emory because they're they're really interested in being able to predict in a clinical setting function and decline and we're really interested in a home setting and how to do that so that ultimately we can again identify or develop a model that will. A predictive model to identify trajectories of decline so we can intervene before people decline. The smart bathroom project. Is a project that we're actually doing in Aware Home and the idea here is to develop a bathroom environment with embedded sensors that are capable of assessing an individual's abilities at any point in time and automatically adjusting supportive environmental features So imagine that if we can understand gait balance posture or. High we can then be able to. To develop computer algorithms that will. Control the fixtures in the grab bars and locate them in the right place so right now they're actually there's fixtures on the market in fact where we're purchasing some for the development of the lab that are that mechanically go up and down. And back and forth or or manually do that as well but. They're intended for people to be able to adjust them when they need to well who's going to go into the bathroom and having to go to the toilet and adjust their grab bars in the first place right on the spot first of all they won't know where to put them and second of all the time to do that and probably don't have the strength of the ability to do that so the idea here is that instead of. Creating a fixed environment which we typically do for people who have variable abilities some with arthritis or multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease you know their abilities change daily So if you fix the environment and they do you know to need on day one what happens on day two or three or four so the idea here is to be able to vary the environment as needed for anybody who needs it so we're outfitting the floor with with load cells we have toilet a toilet that goes back and forth and up and down the tub goes up. Not necessarily just because the I'm sorry the third one is the tub the tub goes up so that we can get it out of the way and have. A curb a shower that the tub actually sits in but it allows us to vary the type of height if we needed to and then we've got grab bars we've got a perforated wall basically where grab bars can be put it in any angle or any high or. Anywhere basically So the idea is to test a lot of people get a lot of data and find out what the connections. Are between between ability and biomechanics and metrics and transfer. And the last project in development is probably the coolest one because it's a robot project. Everybody loves a robot projects but this one is really unique because this is a case where the robot interacts with the person physically and it's really I think I'm pretty sure it's the only project that's out there where as you can see. On the screen the robots actually saving Henry who is one of our collaborators he has he had a stroke in and has no body function whatsoever he uses eye gaze he can control the robot. And when we had a site visit he did a demonstration he's in California controlled the robot in the in the lab here at Georgia Tech and was able to drive it around the lab through eye gaze by the Internet so using a Willow Garage P.R. two robot which has a lot of flexibility there not only their programming it and creating a system where the robot can know where Henry is and what the activities are that needs to be done using tactile sensors. And a remote assistance system but what's really going to be unique about this as they get through the technicality of the interaction is to put some smarts into the robot so that the robot can anticipate needs so that the robot will know what the robot needs to do without Henry having to tell it what to do and developing their smartness is. Sort of the next the next level beyond this interaction. And then finally the three training projects. Unlined education. In post-secondary education in the you do your ward here at the C.I. C. competition so the online education is really a series of. Of webinars and web based training to provide we have engineering research skills to rehab engineers and practitioners designers and tech developers. And this is really the goal of the of the. Needler to be able to create the next generation of rehab engineers as well as to impart research evidence base. Practices within within the profession itself so that it's not all see the pants guessing or our expert opinion. The post-secondary training is to introduce the principles of universal design we have engineering research and aging with disability to Georgia Tech students again interdisciplinary really it's not necessarily limited to ID mechanical engineering H.C.I. and psychology. But those are the primary targets. And then finally there's the Universal Design Award in the Georgia Tech convergence innovation competition which is tonight. We have a judge here Clara rebel or has come back to to be a judge in the two and this is an award that is going to cut across all the categories and I think we also have some entrance here into the competition so we're hoping that you know we do pretty well in the US but basically it's again to get the idea of universal design and ageing with disability as a mainstream focus rather than sort of a specialty focus. And we have thirteen minutes left. For us questions. Well this is it's actually Charlie chems projects so I have the the whole team has him put into what they do. The ideas for them to develop the algorithms for machine learning. That's beyond that's beyond my my expertise it's technically for all to Miller for everybody but it's for people who have. Vision loss ness is the be. The rationale is based on people who were mobility impaired that is lation issues might have used a wheelchair or a walker just had difficulty getting disability and community mobility. But were probably successful at doing it and now have vision loss so it doesn't mean that their. Vision loss of vision function doesn't mean that they're blind and doesn't mean that they can't see anything but the will be designed for people who can't see and because it has to be universal. That's what it'll be auditory they'll be they'll be auditory inputs and well at this point they're there they're working on the auditory output and they're you pretty much done all timidly and I've not had this at this. At this prototype but it should have voice input as well. I send all my research assistants out to midtown and they just grab people. It is the thing it's a really good question because getting participants is always the hardest thing and even after you get them. Sometimes you know if you're doing research not in their homes it's hard to get them there so the initial. The initial thrust and actually only answer some of this better than me because she did some of this. Initial thrust was to look at the there are three basic registries that are that we started with so has a registry. Is mostly people with disabilities there's a registry in the human factors and aging lab in psychology when you Rogers which is mostly just older adults and then there's the home lab project where they've got five hundred and fifty give or take people who have agreed to be in projects but not just in the research as research subjects but in their homes so we started with those three but we're continually trying to build on them and actually as we do this integrating the people who are who are from the three registries who participate integrating them into one registry. So there is a standard set of data that we're collecting for people in just in the registry and then they'll be additional data that's collected on a project by project basis although we're trying to have an overlap in a lot of the data that we collect so that when we do the R three project which is a big database project we have you know the same fields but we. I don't want to collect more data for a project than a project needs so if we need you know age for our one and we don't need it for two we might not you know collect their data so there might not be a complete data set for everyone within within the your three project but it'll be at least the same you know the data is of the same type collected in the same way but it's a good question because it always seems easy and it's the most time consuming difficult part. If you want to. Yes. Well so that's a really good question because I went the other way I spent thirty years doing that and now to overcome the limitations of policy. And of. Of A.T.A.I. which is policy or is designed overlaid on policy or vice versa overcoming the limitations to give people something that they can hand in hand rather simply and easily and not wait around for the environment to change to meet their needs. And that was the argument that I made is that. You know regardless of of of what we know about changing the environment. It takes a long time for that to happen if it happens at all good example is Georgia Tech is doing an eighty a audit they should have had done in one thousand nine hundred ninety nine hundred ninety six All right we are twenty years we are twenty years that this institution could have been sued because we didn't have a viable eighty eight transition plan right so the plan just means now we know what we have to do and all we have to do is probably find you know the twenty or thirty million dollars to do it now so you know how how long would it take to do an amp that we could give everybody on campus so that at least they could get around whereas they couldn't do that before so. You. Know. Her and in the end I think one of the. The difficulties has been attracting undergrads to to research in general I do have a fair number of probably half of my my fall classes undergrads but that's which is just on universal design in general. But the undergrads don't typically you know sort of gravitate to research. You go. In. And be happy that. They were. OK There you go instead of are instead of or are Turks. I mean I I mean I do I can answer that question for I can't answer that question for the other projects I can only answer them for for the two projects on the P.R.I. on for one of the P.R. is on so this more about them in the house project but I don't have undergrads working on my other projects either so out of this is one of you know one of four or five projects that I have. But you are asking specifically about you know for for the college. This is just a. Two minute. Well thank you.