Thanks for coming tonight. One week before the end of the studio courses. Time is precious. And I promise to speak very short. I was challenged two minutes or less. And I have no problem with that because the work speaks so eloquently and we want to get straight to it. Perry called Price an architect an associate professor of architecture at the University of Michigan. Prior to his arrival at the University of Michigan. He was a member of the faculty at saw ark for seventeen years as well as a visiting positions at the University of Pennsylvania and Arizona State University. Subsequent to his studies at the California Polytechnic State University in Santa we bespoke and Columbia University. He worked in the offices of Eisenman Robertson. The office of Robert Stern and dad of the ranch and Scott Brown be for the Los Angeles its interests include the writers of representation. And methodology in the production of architecture. And broadening the conceptual range but which architecture contributes to our cultural imagination. Perry called her. Thanks. So first there's want to thank George for the invitation was a great pleasure to meet with may have and hang around with him a little bit. Erica in an arbor. Let me ask you to think a little bit about imagination or imagination or spatial imagination or something. So what I'm what I'm going to try to do is. Some words that go along with a bunch. It images and I'm going to try to build up. This issue of the ways in which are some of the ways in which I try to develop my imagination. And I'll use three primary sources of imagery one is. Objects in the world. Secondly all use a number of student images and lastly I'll I'll make some points through some of my own work. One of them when I meet with students for the first time in a studio I base the first thing I say them is arms. I'm paid to help you develop your spatial imagination. That's what I get paid to do my job is no more no less than that. So when George asked me to think about the imagination. It's probably not something that I had ever done frontally. But probably something that I'm working on in a latent or nascent way all of the time. So the talk the talks essentially structured. Apologies for my voice. We have a four and a half year old. In preschool the talk is structured through the primary points are in white. The top called Creative prosthetics. You know I'll make points about constructing a world. The imagination visions or visionaries swap meets unique objects visualisations means for working analogic thinking. What Ifs and then I'll finish with some of my own work to read two things. If I could. They're very very brief as a way to set out. The problem of the imagine. Nation. Eventually. One truly sees by allowing one's attention to become absorbed in streaks of dried spit or spittle or the surface of an old stained wall until the imagination is able to distinguish an alternative world. Francis poem in is new introduction to the pebble in a minute cut part of this out and get to the part that for me is salient relative to the talked and. The infinity of propositions contained in the least worthy objects is so manifest that I am as yet unable to report on anything but the simplest ones a stone a blade of grass a block of wood a piece of meat. I suggest that every person open an interior trapdoor negotiate a trip into the thickness of things that he make an invasion of their characteristics a revolution a turning over process by the plough or the spade when suddenly millions of particles of dead plants bits of roots and straws worms and tiny crawling creatures. All hitherto believed in the earth are exposed to the light of day for the first time. Infinite resources of the thickness of things restored to us by the infinite resources in the semantic thickness of words. So for me. Both of these framings of an imagination. Have to do with. Really occupying things that we take for granted and occupying them alternatively finding unique perspectives within them and much of what I do I think is not unique at all. It's really just trying to attain. Into things in the world which structure one's experience of the conception of one's experience. This is this is a series of some things that have been influential for me in my life. There are probably twenty of these that I should have made and I decided just to make this one. And you can. This is normal normative many people have been influenced by all kinds of things but there's a little bit of range in here for me in terms of the kinds of things that have influenced me but certainly not a limit in terms of how I imagine spatial possibilities in a cultural imagination. The imagination. Partial definition the actor power of forming mental images of what is not actually present. The second one is my favorite a foolish notion. And thirdly resourcefulness in dealing with new or unusual experiences. Or it influences have probably been key to me in terms of my development. Probably more so than architectural influences. Although I'm heavily influenced by architectural and other cultural disciplines. Art influences have been pivotal for me in terms of what I believe possible at the level of cultural imagination and spatial possibility primarily for to keep reasons one is the cultural communication tends to be much much much broader in our practices than it does an architectural practices or in other disciplines. So the range of things that art can do with from gender to bio politics to every day notice to you name it or practices are for me much broader. And secondly it allowed me to move from an understanding about architecture to one of spatiality. And I know that may seem like it's splitting hairs or why would why are those different for me when i Map architecture on to my mental set all of a sudden I'm eighty percent of the way there in terms of what's possible spatially spatiality on the other hand. Allows me to deal with a much greater range of communicative textures. Aspirations and ambitions within a piece of work or in teaching and these two aspects have been dominant for me in terms of the influence that art has had in my world. Welcome back to this when I get to my work do show up as been a key protagonist for me on this front. I'll talk about the labor of work when I get to my work but for me to show up opened a whole set of questions about what it was to be an author that you could actually buy your inal sign your name to it and put it in the museum and issue it as art was for me a pivotal moment in my sort of cultural background and education. That coupled with both fuko and Boris talking about authors in different ways have been influential to me but particularly show up in the range of our practices that he enabled this is desperate in by a large glass that was basically on the floor for a year that man ray photograph. Just show you a bunch of several images now different artist not not not so many actually just a handful of or it influences for me this Joseph boys obviously I like American or in America likes me on the left spending. Handful of days in a gallery with a coyote I was trying to think when I first saw that piece what would your architectural equivalent of that be trying to. Populate that imaginative way. Certainly Iran of us Bosh one of the students in the studio right now is working on this is a site. For four three houses and one actually but Bosch as a kind of an early surrealist. Has been an enormous influence on me in terms of the range of cultural attitudes of value systems of logics which are in this single painting where I WAY WAY dropping a two thousand year old Honda honesty VOZ these kinds of influences of giving me a sense of the ability to take risks or to imagine going to places that I wouldn't have otherwise met imagined relative in my architectural training Richard Barnes has been a recent interest. The animals logic photographs of particular interest to me shown in Robert Park Harrison a photo photographer and a painter essentially the architects rather rather is a series that has been influential a lot of Peter Greenaway as work lots of filmmakers. Elo a photographer. Begin just various are practices in art influences that have helped me think about the possibilities for a spatial imagination. MATTHEW CARNEY Christmas or series. Jewel Peter would care for it's a photographer. Rename agree. The human condition all kinds of surrealists have been important to me. Richard Ms Rock a photographer. Peter Shelton sculptor cetera et cetera et cetera so art influences. Terms of opening up a range the cultural the ability to deal with cultural systems cultural logics move the communiqué. Nations around. Well it's been for me much more. It's much more adept versatile dextrous than architecture has been at least recently that of course visions visionaries. Don't just very informal you know the normal expected ones Davinci parent easy way. Royal Tower of Babel. Archigram and so forth a whole series of visionaries that have opened up what architecture can be brought in the Russian. The Russians don't House competition goatskin Newton. My friend Nat sure when a peg is interest in the architecture of the interior. His Works been of interest to me a kind of vision visionary friend more and calamity. The Bartlett to an empty it cetera et cetera et cetera so the whole world of vision visionaries. And I have been influential in terms of opening up my capacities for spatial cultural imagination. Swap meets I'm interested in the show what I don't think are particularly unique or let's say interesting objects here but I'm just interested in things that are curious that are peculiar in the world that have have communicative residence. But stand outside of the norm. David mock the Irish sculptor. Things that you might find it a swap meet unusual instruments. Davis month an Air Force Base cloaking cladding a racing five thousand airplanes. The Japanese watchmaker its interest cetera et cetera so. When I first moved to Los Angeles. I would normally two to three week in this each month. I would go to swap meets him essentially just look at things which interested me. Interesting women's hats from the thirty's guns instruments saddles whatever. It would try to I would try to imagine how those might become architectural or what the architectural ramifications of those would be mostly I was trying to increase my formal though Cabul or because I felt quite limited in terms of what I had accomplished both in school and in practice. George mentioned I was and. Denise Scott Brown John Rock and Bob in turn his office for five years. And when I left there. Philadelphia I moved to Los Angeles and. I was a stints oblique thrown into my first teaching gigs was teaching when Marion Ray In the olden Aryan around told me in a dark Masaka rotunda and Khoya Howard Robin Korean. And I couldn't quite figure out how to kind of co-exist there happily out of felt like I was in the shadow of someone always. And I won't show them tonight. But I produced three house projects at that time in one nine hundred ninety one and one in West Germany one in the southern California desert and one in want to see you know California and they were essentially the same house formally materially conceptually and it occurred to me at that time that I had no way really to work on sixty years of a life time because I was realigned essentially on my facility. And want to begin to do as I began to open up a series of questions through. The architectural drawing. For both myself and with the work that I was doing with students in there are a handful of key things that come out of that work in terms of opening up what I thought was possible both imaginatively in terms of conceptions of space and cultural structure but also in terms of the work that the architectural drawing might do. Is that I begin to understand that I could move between the language of architecture in the language of representation. That was a big moment for me because I was always in the world of the language of architecture. Secondly I realise that there were multiple levels of communication that could happen simultaneously in the architectural drawing or visualisation. That also. Wasn't part of my background. I was too old in perspective sections plans X. on a metrics and so forth. Those all of those representations are useful but they all require the Lions to jump to the same platform level essentially at the same time. So I was interested because I couldn't figure out based on what I was trying to think about what some students were trying to think about how to get the lions to the same platform always. I had to figure out ways to stagger the ideational rate. So we developed a whole series of techniques and I'll show you a handful of those techniques here to try to liberate the palate so that a broader range of constituencies could enter into spatial production in the constitution of space. So the multiple levels essentially composite representations that is multiple families of representation happening simultaneously was something that I began to evolve in the middle in the late ninety's and then. For myself I'm an architect. But in teaching in particular for me. The materials conceptual. Gravity is sometimes gone missing in duration is Mel uble. Now those seem heretical probably relative to the conventions of architectural training for myself and I'm not trying to represent alternative or other points of view. The education of the architect is not the education the professional Those are different things. There are moments of tangency in moments of dispersion So for me material being conceptual gravity missing occasionally in duration million will became an important component of trying to imagine alternative spatial possibilities. I gave you a couple of examples now in terms of how I think visualisations might open up the field. Of what we actually do. Sure you some representations from a studio that I did in one nine hundred ninety six. These are called strategic plots in essentially what I was trying to do is figure out with the students how to plot things spatial scenarios over and through time. So this is pretty digital This isn't stuff you know that lawyer running around the studio like wildfire. And what we essentially did is I had the students look at existing conditions. This fellow was looking at a very small area in a basement old guitar saying sort of rusted out piping broken bricks in newspapers. Well they asked him to do is try to visualize what made that scene possible. What structure that scene. A simple example if I had a pencil here. This is the one that then innocent maybe Treffry in this in the audience have experience I know Dennis probably has what I would do is something like this I would hold up a pencil a wooden pencil what I called a rogue a number two and. I would say what makes this possible in the world. Generally the students would sort of looked quizzically at me and be silent and I would say deforestation and mass production objects that are race themselves and censor things in the world the history of writing etc etc etc etc So those things structure the pencils on in my hand you know. So what we tried to do in this work. That's a more expansive conversation which we don't need to get into it's not what I asked him to do is really look at the saying. And try to unpack it figure out what structured it and then figure out what graphic means they could deploy to figure out what structured something. And then what we did we did a bunch of preparatory work in the studio at this time but what we essentially did is took this thinking and said Right. If we can read a condition back to ourselves as architects working in our medium then couldn't we design that way. So one of them did is we developed this business of strategic plottings this is a this is a later development of strategic plot this is one of Dennis's mates up at Michigan working on a kind of strategic plot but these are strategic plots that were done in ninety six where this is the analytical side here essentially looking at what structures the site what kinds of things structure the site. This is a strategic plot towards an architectural landscape proposal for a kind of landscape survival game. Piece of Work. So what I was trying to do is open up representation. So that the students could work on things that they didn't know how to formulate yet as an architectural or material landscape consequence but they could support in the. In Taishan zz. When I was tooled in school I made a model or a floor plan or a perspective sort of out the door. Maybe a diagram. It occurred to me that given the range. I'm been very very fortunate to work with some incredibly interesting and bright students at tombs that right here they honor their abilities to intellectually produce a construct for the work normally the same is true for me knew only exceed their abilities to express that formally a material and so what we were trying to do is a vote of techniques by which they could support a wage of kinds of interests. I mean families of interest way all over the map. Without knowing what those were going to be awkward touch really or material or formal way. So these strategic plots were developed at that time to devote let their imaginations visually parallel their intellectual and conceptual imaginations. So I'm only showing you the first phase of the work when we developed what we call bridging techniques and that meant that we were trying to move from these strategic plots towards spatial material make up without dropping things off it shouldn't be dropped off. As a result of this work a lot of what happened in all talk about this relative to my own work. The late content of drawings became important not the explicit content not the explicit ambitions of the author but those things which begin to aggregate in pool and relationally surface as the work was happening. These are enormously labor intensive. This is probably one hundred twenty five hour drawing a drawing one at the time of Joe remember this one pitch the studio's a tell the students want to pitch them. If you can spin it. At least fifty hours a week in the studio. Don't bother. JOD transferee sitting right there. I'm going to guess he's been sixty to seventy hours a week working in the studio and I want to show just one of his images but it requires that kind of commitment to to actually let the imagination come alive at multiple levels. So now I'm in a spin a little less time and give you a little bit of a scattering of other kinds of representations which have been worked on this is this is not a good way to show student work this is this is. This is disrespectful of the student work the student works incredibly interesting very very thoughtful superdense And all I'm doing is showing you snippets out of context here so please see it in that in that in that light to show you just a series of images now that are worth between notational and indexical work towards It's a double house project in the end of the fees this is a thesis that was done at Michigan a few years ago. Dennis's year Foster. Brian Foster knows you're out of sequence with him and he wait this is student was interested. He basically came to me he said I've been influenced heavily by three people. Matthew Bonney Liz Diller and Gil Richter the German painter. I'd like to find of faeces that would allow me to basically ingest those influences and put them back out into the world. So what Brian did is to do a whole series he basically called from all of those contributors and produced a kind of fourth author issuing a handful of images from the work. And eventually produced a double house. This is the ground floor plan. And this is the roof plan of that house the roof the roof sits commensurate or coincident with the ground playing again working notationally index likely some diagrammatic work this is physical. This is this is physical stuff. And so there's a literal description of what what it might be this is John one of John trying to freeze. Some images from the studio. Atmos atmospheric spatial sequences are some Imma get this totally wrong but Joe was sort of interested and I think bring in mathematics text and atmospheric conditions something like that together and I know I've got it totally wrong. John so apologies but he tried to evolve a method which I think he called a last written description if I'm not mistaken any of the all the set of representational techniques to let him work on a set of problems in the studio which was eventually an office of Weights and Measures. These are indexical drawings for a studio which had to do with surrealist tactics and the student made sixteen plates the sensually therefore plates that have to do with. Programatic and surrealist agendas within the desert. And again these are out of context. I'm not showing you everything I was going to try to give you a sense of what representations are visualisations might be able to do this quite interesting piece of work. We're working on border crossing problems and Gavin came to me one day a little bit distraught. It worked. Streamline our worker. And his printer had no function and they said Goza really all this stuff. Sort of schmutz. What we tried to do is shift the emphasis from a kind of debilitation to an opportunistic one we said let's imagine what this could be. Eventually this turned out this work allowed him to produce seven thousand sensors that set in the landscape and. Sense everything that moved across it at this border crossing. Designed to build you know a building that belongs to this. And so forth but we're trying to all we try to do. There is populate this imaginatively and see if we could. Turn it into a virtue. Is a representation as for a thesis student last year at Michigan was interested. Almost a kind of spiritual redemption of. Parts of Detroit is an image looking sort of back from the heavens down to Detroit. Kind of visualize architectural components and relational conditions within the city. So thesis just totally out of context images but a thesis which had to do with the mesas project for the Los Angeles is to try to let the visualizations allow alternative worlds imaginative possibilities to emerge by working in particular was. So visualizations for me in the form of representation the architectural drawing have been useful I think for some studios and students but also in my work which I'll get to and full of things of my own to draw that out a little bit further. The next really that's really been useful for me in terms of imagination is how we work as a student. Basically I inherited the means of working with the to do a faculty member put forward as an agenda and that was fine. That's a totally legitimate way to work. As I begin teaching is sort of got a little bit of legs under me. Terms of confidence but things that I thought were important questions with respect to education. It occurred to me that no one was really thinking about how we work. So again John was a kind of guinea pig studio Studio John ninety nine ninety nine two thousand and two and so we want that. So what we tried to introduce I think there were eight methods at the time that were introduced in the studio and the idea was that if we could get a hold of the other. The Elo characters are different ways to work in I'm not developed any of them just identified them essentially. Content to form might be me but when we tried to do is we tried to identify multiple ways in which you could produce work that had various value systems attached to them and really different formal material predilections attached to them begin the talks not about is not about going into the methods but these if you deploy these in combination you invent them methods can be enormously helpful with respect to allowing you to produce alternative kinds of work and I'll argue that to make a new city in Shanghai. You might need to work differently even if you're working on a thesis which has to do with biological tropes and metaphorical relationships to mythology that you really need to work in very very different ways to optimize the performance of your engagement with that material so to be just be relatively brief about this and then I think there's an interesting piece of work a book or something to do with this method stuff. And I've been encouraged to do that but I'm not yet. I think it's important for a handful of reasons one. It increases the architect's dexterity and versatility with respect to what he she or they can do no question about that. Secondly it implicates the author in very very different ways different kinds of energy different reflective capacities different generative conditions. So it really you know it really allows you the reflection on on methods really a lot you to understand that you might author from very very different perspectives. You might need to be a translator one moment third person another moment first person another what backed out of the equation altogether the next. The aesthetic wage is enormous within this range of methods. It's enormous. In. Maginot the level of gestural interpretation that on gesticulating wildly in space now eight video cameras on me. And I've been pyramid for size or geometric size those movements and produce for in that way. That's very very different than I'll show you a couple of pieces of my work which are imminent from a kind of content to form problem where they be. I basically start with the content of the work that it's about suppressive scopic regimes It's about not terminal indulgences. It's about curatorial problems. It's about many many things. Well it often starts with eight ten twelve fifteen things like that with no formal new material predilection and all you can think you can produce form in both of those ways formations. I don't mean formalised I mean formations will attempt to both of those sets of interest in a radically radically different in turn in turn in terms of their the way they're developed their cultural proclivities the way they attach themselves and the history of ideas in the context of the world. Analogic thinking Anil analogic making was one of the means by which I will take you to produce work. It's really interesting for me in terms of architecture architects never know what things are but they often know what things are like. I say the students now that you can increase your formally material vocabulary one hundred fold by just understanding how to work in a logically so I can make a living room that's like a section through a trauma bone. I could make an organizational logic that's like flocking birds crossed with the ways Sidewinder rattlesnakes mate. They can be like I can. The only limit there was my imagination in terms of what I might draw from in terms of analog. Logic thinking you know there's no free for all it can be but the way in terms of the way that I use in a logic thinking there normally a whole set of ideas in play in the analogic thinking helps me bridge to places that I could not otherwise formulate with abit of form of production. I'm going to show you some analogic models. Talk in Boulder. Four hundred fifty years ago analogic thinking. And there were students over the years have used analogic think you know models to help the cogs trucks visualizations to help them think through a series of problems for an optics field station snail logic construct. This is a thesis thesis piece of work that was looking at sort of symbiotic relationship with natural and artificial conditions. This is in the surrealist studio and this is a student working on a theater as part of her work but this was an initial construct to try to visualize aspects that theatre. Here's a plain view of this theatre which drags itself across the landscape about six hundred feet long drags a self across a landscape where the studio of the John Trafford was in where we dealt with when we deal with biblical events and information logics this is an analogic house and garden in the studio. This is another analogic house and garden things are like things analogues require translation because you're only the problem of likeness you not in the problems of this is that. This is a new institute for architecture it's an analogue to construct for essentially it's kind of a new school. Think Tank research facility. It's a scanner. It's rebuilt. It's main logic construct. Israel logic constructs for a frozen motel zoo. In the surreal a studio or frozen motel zoo. These are analogic constructs for the architecture Institute. So you know logic construct an architecture that makes the races and remakes parts of itself. Talking to the conceptual triggers in a short while. So illogical instruct for a museum for things red or a D N R E A D. This is a construct on the left for a kind of border crossing preparatory work room installation space and then this is a this is a sort of proto plan for the border crossing on the right side in a logic construct for the museum for things red or E A D or a day. The studios are fairly complex in their make up and I'm just isolating key. Thrusts or conditions within the studio to try to make a point. So I tried if I tried to move for a moment touched on the surrealists is an important influence for the opening of an imagination. The key thing about the surrealists is they use the context itself as a way to open up and reframe our conditions or perceptions of it. So from what greets and Dolly to wait. Duchamp to model etc Those the surrealists have been enormously important for me in terms of what I imagine is possible spatially representational And but most importantly culturally. Occupying the implausible. I'm interested in trying to. Figure out how we might occupy things which are let's say impossible so the flower and I think about an architectural where I can so I can be in the architecture scanning the flowers edge. That's not difficult for me to imagine that. I'll show you a slide at the end it all ask you to imagine spatial or architectural possibilities to sort of turn the flip the coin flip the switch to get you invested in letting your imagination occupy alternative worlds. And then things like conceptual triggers. What do I mean by that. Here's a motel for twenty four paranoias. The surrealist studio so conception by conceptually framing the program. All of a sudden you can ratchet yourself out imaginal an alternative way to be in the world. The frozen motel zero again a refuge for the refusal of Graeme's. Circus of migratory wind. For me. These are not imaginative stretches now at all these are sadly I work on the margins at times because I don't think of these as stretches at all any longer. This is an architecture of multiple psychologies the architecture of schizophrenia delusional. And leg Rufo because I think is this is the third one. Conceptual flip of the switch. What if architecture was the white space of the page rather than the black marks. Architecture that makes the races in remakes parts of itself. This is an egg resue. In downtown Los Angeles that the architect. You can make your race and remake parts of itself digital mania. That's the program That's what the students working on for a semester digital mania. What could it be. This is a thesis student wondering about a scanner. And mishandle a mucking around manipulating a scanner and eventually producing kind of an office space out of focus architecture. What would that be. So we work on problems at times in the studio right now which I'll show one image from where we try to open up the conceptions for architecture. So that the students can think about it. Alternatively relative to their backgrounds this in architecture of fast and slow surfaces and fast and slow programs. This is a plan on the left. Of an urban agriculture and restaurants there sort read parts of the restaurant part of the great parts of the urban agriculture. That's an elevation on the right. It's my my a modeled. This student worked on milled so I was interested in trying to take a contemporary practice of C.N.C. milling. And complementing it with a three hundred fifty year old cultural discipline the baroque. This resulted in a museum for cross dressers the model model space this student was asked to do with what would happen if we materialize the virtual space of a building's construction rather than a building. So rather than his building we're sitting in what if we materialized. All of the material practices the stray dogs the weather conditions. What if we could materialize that. And not the architecture. So basically what Brian did is he took Michael bezel his time lapse photographs of the moment New York and in this case he's basically trying to materialize the steel fabrication and the light constitution within the construction process three houses in one. This is also three houses and one architecture that makes the racism remakes parts of itself in these are preparatory drawings towards. What would happen if you built the plant here and this section over here. So this is a Catalan compass. And this is a metallurgical arsonist. There are five characters they try to make possible or look into the possibility that the plan would be over there and the section would be somewhere else. Surreal materiality. This is a produce section through basically a hotel and recording studio in Hollywood. These are modeled components of the motel surreal materiality. So a student working on split temporality He's basically taking things that are happening on Lake Michigan. With sensing those conditions transferring those to a space between buildings in Chicago and producing a whole series. This is a window from a motel room so whole series of objects which animate that space based on intelligence those which are gained somewhere else. As part of a studio which I ran last year which is called refined form and it doesn't have so much to do with. This problem of conceptual triggers other than the students had to produce a house a blank house that opened up the conceptions for architecture so this is a called a plus one house and it basically tries to deal with zeroes and ones. Digital protocols algorithms that calculus of the machine towards alternative house production. This is a house from a great. This studio will find form had to do with this is parent Fedak a little bit but I've been teaching a lot of topical studios or conceptually grounded studios. This was what I call the structural studio. That is structural not that structure not getting weight from the out of there but trying to frame the studio kind of outside of your topics. So they had to deal with the ethical production of work. They had to deal with this bit the operations of the architect. They had to deal with their own ambitions and programatic logics I didn't really care what the issues were I didn't care how they work. I wanted to work in sort of an structural way. So they could take the lessons from the studio and work on them in any kind of pace and work not surrealism not Biblical events not abandonment. Marginalization in the periphery. So the way this business bull bit off topic but this is a house from a great. This is a hybrid landscape house. This is the same hybrid landscape house. This is a work that's currently going on the state is a preparatory piece of work. It's a house for the red tide. In a studio we're opening up the conceptual triggers so everyone has one. This is another bit revisitation of a house of multiple psychologies but everyone I know certainly one has a conceptual drawing of like that. House of the multiple psychologies. Or some of the others. So made it a house that makes the racism remakes parts of itself. House is a fast change artist. So for Sarah was designing a house and they have a conceptual drive and they have a site. Both a conceptual drive multiple psychologies virtual materialize in a virtual space of buildings construction those conceptual drives and the sites are meant to be restraints. So there were the serious cold domestic restraints and I'm like you in that when we work with against restraints that we develop alternative muscles spatial conceptual intellectual muscles is based on Matthew Bourne is drawing restraints where she basically produces incumbrances so he can't do certain things to allow himself to imagine alternative things that he could do anyway. We're just working in the studio now and everyone's got one of these conceptual drives and they also have sites that are let's say less than normal. So this is the site is a red tide or someone has Bosches garden of earthly delights as a site where underneath the vilest wall or over the shrines it. So the sites all come with restraints obstacles objectives that don't let you do a house in the conceptual drives are trying to open up the ways in which we might conceptually think about architectural or spatial production. Well finish with some work of mine not a lot a little bit. You know frame it just a niche. From four particular vantage points. One the labor of work when a show. Duchamp's you know an all or fountain. I mention the labor of work for myself do shop allowed me to think about opening up the practice of architectural turn into really the work that we do. And for folks put in for me and I don't want to represent other points of view the labor of work now shifts from the labor of architecture to the labor of work and it opens up in terms of my imagination what's possible a whole range of things that were previously not there. I touched on the language of representation in the language of architecture. I try to move between those places trying to figure out acupuncture really when to agitate the language of representation. When to agitate the language of architecture. I try to be very very careful when and where those things come into play latency a lot of my work again will lies on things which live below the surface behind the surface in front of the surface wind me. And I try to probe the representations that I make and asked the students to do the same to try to find those assemblies those root relational assemblies that they were not aware of but they have started to gurgle to talk to offer potential with respect to an imagination about spatiality and maybe lastly So I mean it's very very important to me the mechanics of engagement that is basically managing the variables in a piece of work. So it is new and relational structuring. Which is the way we talk about it in a literal way relational structuring the type duration and weight of real. Ation ships within a piece of work and those relationships are all over the place. From cultural primitives the building techniques to representational logics to institutional critique and so forth. I'm interested in trying to manage those variables and understand the weights and values that they have with respect to a particular piece of work. I'm going to show you a hint full of selected images and from stuff that I've made. To try to draw out the business of imagination a little bit more. This was work that I made in one nine hundred ninety six which was parallel in the strategic plots work in the studio. I was trying to develop techniques and I made about forty images like this where I could learn. Try to think about things in time plotted durational. And at the time it was working on a date to David's Island competition which was an ideas competition. For an island off the coast of New York about. This is a plan ish you about three quarters of a mile long. And what I tried to do I was working on a range of topics content the form that had to do with military suppression scopic regimes mythologies an island folklore or military jargon blah blah blah blah blah. All of that stuff was rooted out of the island and what it was about what it was entailed so all the issues that I thought the work should be about surfaced as a result of a kind of careful looking at this island and what I tried to do is develop. A means by which I could start to plot some of those ideas and in some cases physical manifestations programatic law. Objects. Over and through time and this was the first set of marks on that particular drawing that allowed me to start to to look at that possibility of basically spacing or phasing ideas and stuff over and through time. So these are details when you go back just so you get a sense total lunacy or sort of is there actually I developed programmatic logics then there was no program for the competition I developed program magic logics to help me deal with those issues. Folklores and mythologies and nautical navigation and military regimes and so forth and so on. So I'll just touch on some of the program magic things that evolved in the work. Bees or winnings for mythical sea travelers the kind of whisker like pieces and there are two to six hundred foot long concrete pieces with steel edges and Paul up labs that comb them periodically. There are kelp Augustine beds. So scientific information comes together with kind of mythological structure probably these big camouflage camouflage it surfaces these black and white things they're essentially black and white marble in the black spaces muscles always. As part of the work in the white spaces children sail white miniature sailboats they're also swap meets the go on those things. These are photo ops. They move around the side in a while you to opportunistically photograph conditions. This is a surveillance field and polish metamorphic rock garden. They're all set of sensors that are thirteen fifteen sensors that sense this distant ocean oceanic conditions and feed that information. Back here that produces polishing conditions for this this metamorphic rock or their easement fences that run through the work all the red lines are those things. There are a whole set of funny. Kind of curved black pieces when you stand at that position right there. Those are steel walls when you stand here. Those produce a perfect Arisan in a clued any sense of the distant land or the ocean. There's a landing vessel multiplied officers headquarters in excess of mutiny there bird colony lines in here of silver shell surface. These are a labyrinth of emptiness which essentially accelerated diesel right when and where of sight out in different ways while blah blah blah blah. There's just just details that draw and this is just a technical drawing of the architectural elements. There's a way escape drawing which isn't finished yet. That belongs to this. This is another piece of work which which I try to imagine. Basically the for magic content of a museum. So this is a visualization of basically what the work is about. This Thetic scientific and historic understandings of cultural artifacts problems of curation structures of vision curiosity problems Curiosity Cabinet problems that knowing Greek muses as a possible reinstallation to do with the museum at center etc etc Just It's called a fanatic drawing. Just the primary thematically conditions of the work I'm just trying to visualize. So in clear my head. So those other room for work to be done here. I'm literally just trying to visualize what the work is about there's some proto architectural elements. This is a pro architectural element. This is this is here. So it's not purely for the magic There are some things. I'm not averse to moving the work towards geometric conditions when I know them shoes me there are three cryptic site drawings for that piece of work Cross have across it across an across and it's up walk in Fresno California. There are three drawings which essentially try to hieroglyphic Lior glyph a CLI produce indications indexes tendencies for what the spatial conditions might be. Those are called cryptic site drones. This is a drawing when trying to work on the nine Greek muses and I'm trying to work on knowing drawing machines that continually action reaction alabaster surface. The alabaster falls into a quipped which moves around the site. So all I'm trying to do is visualize what I can know about those knowing great uses drawing machine alabaster archival surface. So proto formal drawing just trying to imagine what that could become detail from the drawing. And then I shouldn't even growing something like this is a super super super early and crude stand in for a piece of the museum. These are post it notes. That's nothing just there. These are a little These are starting to be developed is an archival surface that cattle run around in. It's actually two archival surfaces now and this is a gallery pace is a primary piece of the museum. This is the alabaster. Archival surface again just a dummy a trope a stand in a post it note that's not what it is just trying to get the work they usually this is a student helping me just trying to get a base based model so that we can start to work on some things this is just an elevation view of that same model. I shouldn't show you this is this is less than a good sketch this is this is quite pitiful at the moment but you get it. I'm interested in architecture it actually might be able to get to space itself. I just want to try to demonstrate and then when I know how many I have four hundred pads of yellow paper or a map by weapons that look like this stuff. This is a house that I've tried it I was trying to work on it made three proposals for it's called fast which basically I'm trying to get out of the way I'm a poster poster at this image. I'm trying to get out of the slow ways in which I work in trying to imagine an alternative way to work so I basically tried to work on a desert house now three iterations of it. No going to show you that was a plan or even two states there are three elevations studies. One two three and you can see the architectural objects Billy the joins are very hard to capture their quote their little bit subtle. All that. So I'm going to show you a super super crude model equally crude to the to the museum thing. So this is these are three of the ark. These are three of the these are literally just extruded from the elevations so it's not this isn't anything. But what it is what the House is essentially is this piece moves their trucks on the side this piece moves in is the sleeping space this primary living space. This is if you want to kind of follow a shelter or a kitchen piece then there are whole series of gardens that are milled by landscape scale million machines. And it's constantly million in re milling aspects of the site and they're set up so strange objects in this thing is a pool. This is a fancier a wall the rhetorical shadows. Unusual kind of Nomen as that aren't here yet wobbled law. The next time this work owes them of the world it will be properly don't. Kid I'm trying to imagine house in which I basically suffocate or a race domestic orientations. So I'm interested in trying to produce a house where I to race suffocate bleach out since are things which Korean to us domestically practises equipment spatial conditions and so forth. What I did is a way to imagine the a racial point the censorship part is I made a pair of drawings. This is one of them all I'm trying to work on is censorship any Ray sure. So there's a drawing made which you see almost none of now and then essentially systematically and that drawing is the drawing. It's made or meant to be proto or kind of indexical elements for the for domestic practises lighting a piano a threshold or practice. There just indexical marks and then what I do is I systematically come back and erase sensor and then re code those marks just so that I understand what that practice might entail. It's not a plan so sessions that a. Active it's not it's not any of those things. It's pro it's prior to then there are a pair of what I call reflexive objects they will go back into this now evacuated domestic scene and try to restructure it. So this is this we need to work on this right need to work on this. This is just in this state. Now I see it but we haven't been able to model it. It was just details of pieces of biopsies from that drone. I got interested in ratio as an architectural activity I was asked to give a lecture at the Bartlett about three years ago the Bartlett School of Architecture at U.C.L. University College London in my opinion is the best design school in the world. Best Architecture School in terms of design. They probably had more formal an aesthetic range than any place in the history of architectural education. So I said What can I possibly talk about in a place that's manifest probably as much formal material or ticklish and as any place I know whether you agree with whether you think it's a good school or not is not the point I try to figure out something that I could talk about that might contribute. I was thinking about a ratio as an architectural activity an offering and making in a started a piece of work in which I took Vermeer's the great Dutch painter known as for me or known Vermeer's order of painting. And the idea is that by working through it at the level of Ray sure that I would like to produce the art of architecture through eraser as an architectural activity. Anyway this blossomed into the talk that I did at the bar which was much more expansive than this but try to look at the Unmaking of something as a way to challenge the racialists appetite of the architect. I also have about Doubt is a was a as another. Way to imagine things I have about eight hundred landscape drones. I should have about eight thousand of them. The idea was that I would make one a day they would take I would take a shower and it would make one and I did it for the first six weeks. But my schedule and travel and family life and all that sort of got in the way didn't get the way I want it and get away at all. Quite the opposite it. I was unable to continue with that set of practices but what I was interested in is developing a very particular discipline for working on something. It was working on a landscape and realize it. Knew anything about it. So I tried to evolve ways in which I could represent landscape conditions and they work in series small series as for the largest series of thirty five and there are about eight hundred of them and one essentially do as I sit down. They're all done on eighteen by twenty four white trace two layers tape two inches in two inches in white tape eight inch bobble blow. Twelve inches by nine inches and any number of things can motivate the imagination from some stuff I have sitting around in the workspace to a poem that my wife Amy might give me to imagining something like a perspectival sky what would that be like to a micro landscape. Anyway what I do what I do is I just work on them. These guys these are really quite there was these were fun I had a bunch of finishers and turpentine stuff laying around the studio just for them. I made some gold leaf marks and some asphaltum marks those little dots and I basically poured the stuff a little bit like alchemy onto the surface. And is the surfaces started to dry. I simply took seven million a dry pigment graphite and I just love that. Drawing us into existence little bit like looking at the stride spit on the wall try to try to imagine an alternative world which really would rob the drawings in the present saying. So these are called invisible. These are called Pompei in just about room and auto facts and the debris the archaeology the thickness of places like these these are I think that much better is things they don't photograph particularly well but you get a little sense of what they are. I just had cadmium red hanging around the studio lot of stuff. Taped and paint and drawing things. So I had this color and I just I was thinking about Chinese landscapes at the time scroll painting Chinese iconography and I just tried to evolve the series which basically use that color. So you see. These are I was interested in those controlling things too much an architect controlling things here. So I said can't do that. So as interest income. I was thinking about Chinese calligraphy So I just close my eyes with these and made a hole so there's just graphite walks on it kind of yellow background series that look a little bit like this. I stopped making a series once I feel like I've exhausted my imagination essentially. Do won't be too much longer a promise. I was asked to participate in the progress in two thousand and five it was quite interesting framing of what I was asked to deal with I was asked to do with architecture is a transience phenomena period and OK I can do that. I think one of ended up doing I won't give you the long history but I ended up dealing with problems of instinct and desire which I basically argue. To myself and sure that work instinct and desire have been eradicated from our cultural experience will realm information logic saturation level but what. So I dealt with instinct and desire in the way I did it or the way I'm trying to do it still is a to both what I call the medicine fear exist and it's a cross between medicine between metaphor and atmosphere. Spiric. Sue. Well I did then as I developed six species. Cloned ific unborn so forth. And three program elements a roving taxidermy Botanic surfaces and a vessel for obsolete atmospheres. When I was interested in is trying to develop the species that move between the domesticated and the Beast steal the savage in here with respect to this problem instinct and desire. What this is it's a fifteen foot long image so this is about the size it was this is the graphics. This is the graphic demonstration of the image. It's basically one of the fanatic plots. So the species are in here the kind of relational make up of those things or any other certain coding in indexing devices. They were killed somewhere between attacks taxonomical framework in a puzzle. And what happens there. Actually it's all put together there. The only images are mounted in the reworked their gold leaf parts they're drawn parts they're real fabric parts blah blah blah blah blah prog but basically all I'm trying to do is imagine the problem of transience architecture through conditions of instinct and desire modeled on these. This sort of species in this medicine so obviously the initial images where I wasn't saying much were part of that part of their representation. So what we did last summer. So we're starting to we I don't do digital I don't work digitally. Sadly. But if a student was helping me model simulate the behaviors of some of the species because room actually interested in trees the landscape of architectural proposal and I'm actually interested in designing that stuff. So that's where we were trying to move that piece of work forward now as well is just biopsies slightly larger biopsies and the earlier images which I opened up with. And you know finish with a piece of work which I'm currently working no through a grant which Monica Ponce de Leon or new dean who some of you know well from here. She made of fair chunk of money available to faculty members so competition basically we had to write a grant proposal. I got lucky to get one of them is meant to be a two part Grant. This is called Can Be Dragons. This is called spatial blooms here be dragons. There's the areas in Medieval maps that are under the margins. They both deal with problems of landscape and hell landscape might fold itself back across architecture this proposal which I'm not working on it has to do with taking two or three of my landscape drones and trying to figure out what those could be architecturally no questions asked no cultural density. No history of representation. No history of landscape stuff no garden thinking. None of that just trying to figure out. How to take landscape representations and make them architecture this part which I'm working on is called spatial Bloom's fundamentally it's a much more complex structure than this but fundamentally it has to do with taking landscape principles axial structuring the Meander picturesque garden those principles and crossing those with landscape elements Dykes berms fences rabbet Ment's fortifications and so forth. Taking those two things landscape elements landscape principles and then running what I'm calling landscape biology's against those are through those landscape biology's genetic manipulation maintenance logics insect infestations dormant season fallow conditions in landscape essentially temporal logics that belong to landscape and I'm trying to produce an alternative architecture that has imbedded temporality So these are super super graphic things I'm going to show you. And they're essentially nowhere but I'm going to show you them nonetheless was working on this now. So we're working on there are things called Fabric predators belong to us. Let me give you a little ditty that will give you a sense of where I'd like to go with this work. The three line thing. Spatial corsets and fabric predators in the midst of configured blooms scanning belike surfaces and suddenly hiding in a bio diversified architectural not spatial devices of or for wondering or a temporally loaded in triggered architectural ecology scaled in a scalar at the same time. So we're trying to visualize some things now we're not we do not have the temporal logics in place at all. We do not have the. Architectural logics and play these are basically visualizations of landscape principles landscape elements there we're trying to visualize towards this spatial blooming problem. Looming so mentor a student in space blooming literally temporally load it phased with respect to landscape principles and landscape elements. So again we. These are super quick visualisations of how things might be organized in a spatial set up. Now we got a couple more images. So this if I could mean this is an old image but this is a little bit indicative of. What I imagine the landscape elements of the landscape principles to be there's no durational there's no temporal there aren't maintenance logics. There are fabric predators which secrete rubber masks on surfaces as a result of information which they've gathered from fifteen seventy two Venice. Which would like to try to get to in the work. So anyway this is this is a mature I should have shown this one either. It's so preliminary and. It's basically just it's great it's incredibly graphic at the moment. You know finish. I'll just finish the talk with these two images of the aurora borealis them and thinking lately about what architecture would be like they could populate that could occupy its edges in densities and saturations and proclivities to chain. And it ask you to maybe think about what could an architecture a species note in your imagination. Be like that might actually use this as the site for work for me in terms of what's necessary terms they are architectural and spatial imagination with respect to developing a cultural imagination. It's important that I can populate that and imagine that culturally spatially architecture where there is potential where I can ask you to you know just for a moment. Open the imagination to another place that might allow you to say you know I can imagine doing. A cloning clinic in that space. Or I can imagine developing an architecture that makes the races and remakes parts of itself that would populate we construct animate negotiate the possibilities within something like Iraq borealis or scanning the flowers and. That's it that's it. There will have. I'm sure it's I'm sure it's midnight already but I'd be happy to take questions. If that was if anyone at them. Thank you for your and thank you very much for coming out of a really appreciation. Well last thing while staying. Questions. To us please. Here's. The life. Speech was. Were were you. The reason I asked Is Were your students kind of. This is this from. Years down the road. Well I said I'd like to go for spatial stuff I mean in particular. If I were to use your so I guess. That work well that little ditty. Fabric predators and spatial corsets scanning berm like surfaces configured warble blooms. That's what I see taking at work. Yeah that work right now looks like it looks like graphic design and we've been so I mean there are million images like we've been we've been fighting. I think we've made a break. Last Friday we've actually got it now with. I think a new an architectural or spatial consequence not a graphic consequence but you had a little ditties probably as close as I can get. I mean there are things in it. Now there are there are tests. There are sort of arrayed test tubes with Bonsai like trees coming out of them that are have these secreted rubber masks over them. But the bonsai tree is a class tree. It's actually a kind of an alchemical model for other behaviors the fabric predator will participate in. So what the moment what we're trying to do is produce a whole series of fictions like that like those duties and then we're trying to trying to visualize what those will be so we've lacked the temporal structure with Latin lacked an architectural structure they look like a graphic landscapes at the moment but that's where we hope to take it. Yes. No ideally we're to produce a pair of constructs we're not interested in modeling we're not in a lot of sin making perspective use of space where produce a pair of constructs that are. Many have timing devices they have an advise to illuminate pieces they have configured marble logic they have fabric pieces in them. So we're measuring kind of architectural surrogates not art pieces but we're imagining circuits for architecture but will do if we can get it where we want to it's I mean it's no where no it's garbage. If we can get where we want to we probably will do a full array of spatial articulations but it will be phased in what I said fifteen seventy two Venice will be tapping into multiple temporality reason squeeze even affecting things from alternative places in the world back through that space. We're me to move between medieval technologies and probably the you know nano nano nano technology so it's a longer piece of work than the grants going to. Going to support but at least it would be something we're good at something maybe it's it it's really nothing no it's not anything. It's not interesting. I think it can be for us. Maybe one of the person that's helped me work on it. Been imaginal alternative. I'm interested in participating in a lot of the bio the bio conversations right now but not at the level of the medics and. By award. I'm interested in participating in those logics mostly at the temporal levels and trying to produce an alternative spatial condition I don't know what it would have no idea materially we may have to invent materials and we talk about things that us and Joan do this mean for me it's not impossible to think of making an architecture that's made out of ten thousand Flamingo. Those And then bots and. So we may have to invent some some architectural materials to handle what we're up to the split temporal stuff is going to be hard fifteen seventy two Venice. That's harder than here and now. Sort as I can tell so we would make it. We make it somewhere if we don't. There are two other pieces of work that I'm trying to fold off that one right now trying to get out a way myself. Essentially I just don't like the way it worked and what I'm thinking about. That's a little bit of a break for the border. It's you sure you can. Would you come in status. To your loss. Yeah this you know this is this is a really it's a really interesting question. The dotted line for me the if I had to pick any line type in the equation of architectural. Drawing types though the dotted line would be an interesting one for me because it's both. There are not there. And in my work. I'm interested in complete the latent the nascent as much as I am once visible so it in the Nates essentially from the use of it in minutes from that point of view that it's both. There are not there. It's also used often to suggest kind of morphologies within things that things are X.M.L. changing or shifting their. Their status over and through time. But mostly I like that. It's almost always only apparent to me when I work on the work in other words when I John saw an exhibition in Texas that I did some of the drawings and there are a lot of things like the dotted line that are only there for me really the construction lines. You could ask an equally interesting question about the role of the constructional And I think those really have that's before me. On the surface really practicing drawing trying to figure out what's in it at the level of drawing know the level of content so that the dotted line is also it's coming and going it both wants to be an accomplice. But once to evaporate vision any sense of distance from it. You can't see them. So those are two or three key areas in which I think the dotted line plays a role. I'd like to make an architecture of dawdled lines and I'm interested for example in building all of the lines that we when we make designs I did. There's a bunch of stuff I didn't show tonight. But I made a desert house in one nine hundred ninety eight. John and it is a probably seen interactions of this and I made that plan constructed the plan thirty times. Changes and all that. I'm interested in building all of those long lines. So that's let's say the opposite of the hidden line which is trying to go away. I'm trying to build I'd be interested in doing architecture why I built all the lines. So I'd also allows me to push polls that allows me to put GO GO TO edges which the profile on of the object line would never never let me do because of its inheritance because of the weight that comes with those kinds of lines or markings. If you know for sure. Yes please. Good for you and me. I mean what he taught me. OK. Wow. You know. Guy. Yes. Yes you're on your way and. You. You know I mean that. You have. What are you trying. Yeah it's a good. You know. It's a good question. For me. I try to answer it maybe a little bit along get it and I don't need to be that way but it might be necessary to build it up for me it's easy to have ideas. It's less easy to have interesting ideas. It's less easy to have interesting relevant ideas and it's incredibly difficult to get interesting relevant ideas into a spatial makeup. So there escalating degrees of difficulty in mind in my mind in terms of moving from the intellectual project let's say to the spatial project which is one very very limited way to go about it is you have ideas then you go to stuff that's what I typically do the methods suggest otherwise. What I tell him I put what I tend to do in terms of the framing for my so. Often I think maybe with some of the students I don't know. I know John in a slightly different context I don't know Dennis so they have different registers relative to this but we're really trying to find appropriate ways to work on whatever the phase of the work is that's being worked on. What that normally means is that the ridges are easier to build as you move from something to something else because we're trying to not apply techniques. I don't have any interest and we're trying to figure out relative to the phase of the work that the status of the questions and nature of the relational make up at that moment. One of the best ways to try and advance the work towards a spatial condition if that's what the ambition is let's say it is. So I can only probably give you a general answer in that regard that I'm interested in the students having a full or a full working knowledge of all the conventions. All the monsters that come out of those conventions and inventing things that are nowhere near the conventions. So that they can then methodologically representational and conceptual so they can then say these are the things that seem seem to be on the table. Now these are the things that I think I can mobilize towards manifesting that work at a higher level of spatial definition or to kill ation. I personally use analogic thinking a fair bit. But I don't. When I said earlier the house the section of the house can be like a whatever stupid thing I said you know a section through. Medical Dictionary. Not that cavalier or maverick with what I do what I try to do is take the ideational framework and then often I'll try to imagine formal or material conditions which are have enough degrees of likeness relative to the ideas or relative to the status of the representation. So I can then make a slightly. More mature effort at a spatial or architectural or landscape condition but you're asking a very very complex question and I think you just have to understand. Basically the values that are embedded in every way that you work. What things. What techniques representations methods can and can't do and then try to figure out given the series of questions or conditions I have on the table which things can immobilize to greatest effect to optimize that next job really depends what your ambitions are relative to work. I mean Joe may have been doing some stuff with you that just had to do with how you manage your manipulate representations didn't care about gender or social consequences of the history of ideas you might not care about. So you also really have to understand I think the situation in which you're operating sometimes that will seem I'm just cutting stuff out and folding it and photographing it. That's a totally legitimate way to increase your skill sets and understands and communicative potential of things by doing that. That's different than waiting through idea an idea an idea an idea. Yeah I don't know I'm not sure what the intentions were. But. Beth has to do with it. Well might. Again that dexterity the versatility to really work. I want to be able to make a totally different piece of work if someone asked me to do seventy in here and if someone asked me to do something in China. So I've got to mobilize all those whatever or whatever little bit. I might understand about something which is not very much. Trying to eke some of that stuff into existence so I can do. What's appropriate or relevant. With respect to what I'm asked to do. And also not interested if you know I'm not interested in doing work that other people do it doesn't interest me so I'm that part of the dexterity and versatility which also has to do with knowing that you can work things in very very different ways which Jong part of John's teaching might have done. That's incredibly important. So again it's the dexterity and versatility that you don't. I respect someone like Richard Myers enormously enormously. He's done essentially the same building every single time he's done one that doesn't interest me. It's not. He's a great architect he's way tone better than I'll ever be but it doesn't interest me to do work which is based on that kind of set of logics. So. You mock around sometimes you look around with stuff. I'll make a mark all sit make a mark I'll make seven hundred marks until I like one. Well make a series of objects and say I want to five could make an office building know that I just muck around with stuff so it's OK. Also you don't know what it is you have to deter delay the shelf the gratification shelf life you don't know what you're doing it cut it out for reffin it ended and don't know. But it allows you to see something where you didn't see before you can see that before. That's where contribution occurs when you see opportunities and potential where others don't. So it's that kind of work that allows you to work alternative way that wide open something up and you're going to take on something that you can then share with others. Just one more question right here please. This one. This is don't think this is don't question. Everything so how do I do a gauge that it's a super good. Yes. He's the one who has this right. This is a good question. I fundamentally try to make situational judgements. What do I mean by that I'm hungry in the morning. And with our daughter element I have some oatmeal and some honey on it and some milk and so forth. Situationally that's an approach. Thing for me to do. When I work I try to figure out whatever the work is of I'm working with Dennis and John in room working with I try to figure out what's situationally relevant. What's appropriate to do so. That begins. That's the first scoping of the work. The scope is set there. Now what I'm interested in not someone what someone else thinks out to do but what is relevant. So I go to an ethical structure for the work and try to figure out culturally how can I can. How do I think I might contribute in a try to work on things here questions a good one because the some of the representation techniques could get that thick. You could have known for hours and interests in a piece of work because there's nothing that shuts the water off. It just keeps running. So what we try to do. Maybe both with students and i'm own work again is trying to figure out. Well what if the what the ambitions for the work are. What can architecture take what's its cultural attentiveness from a number of perspectives I try to really continually gauge that scope to figure out then when it's finished. Ultimately I'm not interested in finishing work. I'm interested in work that's incomplete. That doesn't mean that it's unfinished That means it is triggered it's loaded up. It's just ready to go and increasingly I'm trying to figure out what's the minimum I can do to load simply nub So it is just way to spring and all kinds of levels without having to play anything out but my difficulty is having to manage a surplus. I get a lot of stuff in play when I work and I don't know whether these guys at concur. You know a lot of stuff going on in the studio. You know a lot of stuff they're trying to deal with. So this is a brilliant question because ultimately we try to figure out. What to deal with now what to deal with later. Transformation is a part of that what to deal with now that you transform relative to later and what I'm really trying to increase in the last two three years in the studio is trying to figure out how to really keep it on the scope that's the mechanics of engagement how to really manage that. So that you know that you're getting closer. If you can evaluate what you're doing that. You know when to say enough is enough but I make a judgment from all kinds of levels compositional levels historical levels one of what roles as a teacher or an architect. I try to make those that kind of decision from a number of different perspectives relative to what I think the situation is about that situation is that constructed world in which I'm operating the situation is not just the space. It's not that. It's a discipline or a function of what I do the history of ideas how they belong to the situation. My emissions belong to that your emissions belong to it. So the situation is complex but I try to gauge it. The scope when to call it a day relative to situational thinking. Now space enough on it. Where is the space and. Where did it begin. Not to be a not not not trying to make light of I don't think it is fun it. This is a key. This may be a key for me in terms of my imagination. There was one point where I realized that a garbage can. Was not a thing. It was relational assemblies. It's what I call them contoured relationships who made this stuff where it came from the history of treasure and all that so that now is a dispersed temporally dispersed object. So for me. Space is not is is not is not is not finite and that why. It's material it's detectable there are degrees of detectability to it. It is different levels of presence thing but I wouldn't say that it's finite. Well this is also an interesting observation because Y. wife continually says to me that even if I could get into space where I think I could that space couldn't take it. Not that I'm better than space not that I'm better. I'm not suggesting that I'm in a good at what are Durham better than space but I want tendencies to been been to load space up to fill it up. In terms of the work that it tries to do and I think it's She's absolutely right and that's why I'm trying to figure out the incomplete project how to do what how little can I do to trigger and stimulate provoke possibilities for a cultural imagination rather than finishing closing feeling we should. So this is what our eyes tell us because true or president may be very happy to be in the audience you're very welcome. I hope everyone sees walk by here. Thank you for coming. All of you thank you for one.