I'm going to be talking about. Now because it worked we've been doing with the press and even Michael on mechanics of fire and aggregations but I'm going to give you a theoretical perspective on on the way that it's the way they behave the way they do so we start with a simple description of what I mean by dynamic networks. They have these. They have what elastic properties and fluid properties and they can be called correlated with the chains that are in the dam and indeed in the denim in a group having a Spring Lake stiffness that gives them their mass to city and their ability to. Detach and to get that and that gives them the ability to reconfigure themselves which we attribute to the fluidity of the network so this is not. Exactly new in the sense that we have been seen in synthetic polymers in them in the molecule a scale for example with ironic bonds that are pretty weak or adaptable networks that have been recently been studying light so I want to give you an example of the the dynamic nature of the network actually. Many first macroscopically this is. A video of silly body at two different time scales and you see and six scale of second Sibby of that a solid so you can pretty much bunch of of off the surface but then if you lead just by gravity for up more than a few minutes and actually scan see the flow so. The question is this video is going to be here really in different genes and the aspect of these two elasticities including coming from the wind. Characteristics can explain these periods and they're one they're short below is actually an example of sort of healing of these videos where they were able to do for two different pieces actually being coming and going to hear themselves so the question again dancer is sort of these are synthetic systems and and Legations are biological examples of active networks saw. The people of found them to actually be the way the inverse of by use. Their body to link each other and actually form these really nice structures they where they agree that it helps them survive for example of After all if they can morph into a tower or even to build a bridge program they want to put it. So what I'm going to be talking about today is calculating these aggregation as we give us and trying to explain some of the experiment and work that that might be less done in twenty fifteen in their paper so as you see here what I'm showing here is supplied of stress was strangely it and the dotted line actually spawns to a new turn in fluid and clearly these aggregations were tested by in a yarmulke. Shown there and then the. Shit in the sponge was actually a quarter so it's clearly not a simple fluid. It seems to shear thin at large and it's and then go back to the beginning and classical in pretty good models like a string and dashboard systems that have been used again are actually explain this type of behavior saw what the approach that we took was actually to use a statistical mechanics approach. To try and explain if we can go from the behavior of individual ants to the coral aggregation. So. To start with that to put to get the sense of the statistical theory that I'm talking about it let's look at a system of Cedar Springs connected connecting two plates and a and a deformed the plate on the top it's of the force F. and it's being assisted by the springs that are a dash to it so all the or all force actually the summation of all the spring forces the attach spring force and the spring force is given by the stretch so when you have a lot of these springs we can give a character a stem of the population behavior which is shown there. In terms of just the tip if you've got a distribution function and that is describing the frequency or the number of scenes in different stretch values so the OR ARE force actually the the integral of that fear with the force of that crest wants to a certain stretch in the spring so the idea is that you can get if you nor the distribution function at a coffee in Bang then or the order of course in the in the system so OP can extend this to Do D. and you can talk about stress in that network and instead offer a distribution function that looks like that you have a point good. Of that character characterizes the direction of the stretches when you have these iso going to is that so in a. Stress free network he did action is pretty much isotropic So if you start stretching them you will see more direction and dependence so then you can take the street. Expression road it can take the stress again in terms of the feet but now as a dancer with the directional. So the question is if we can get the force from the distribution functions how does the distribution function change in took So that's the question we asked and then sought to understand that what contributes to the change in the distribution function first we start with. The defamation So if we are if I am playing the last of the V. or in this case the velocity of lead in L. then I D. form the chains at the same rate as the change in the distribution function or the function that describes the stretching all the chains would be affected by the needed to be said to form it and then there is a Sync TERM where some of these chains are unable to break and then that and it uses the number of IT that change so I have a sync term and let it. Sit in which the. Brick and then I have a source of them where the chains that Bree unable to deform and a stress free country nation because you know so this was sort of. Evolutionary question of the of the distribution of these the Stritch in that and the legs so it's a it's similar to the boards men equation for in the kinetic theory of gases and saw that they have a similar to evolution equation for the last thirty of the of the molecules so it's. So to. See how that transforms to describe lastic or aggregation here let's look at creep response when the rate at which the form and brick is constant in name so it's a characteristic of the idea so what I defined here this one dimensional number called the ways in but a number where to become a doctor represents that it a sheer them and kid he is a pretty brick So what I'm showing here this four different ways in book numbers what happens to the leg stretch and the leg alignment in average so these distributions sure that the average orientation of the legs is is almost zero in the sense the isotropic and as I said start stretching the more and more and W. becomes closer to one meaning a shear them a defeat at which they can break so if I go beyond that they don't have time to be an inch themselves they're going to stretch a lot as you see here. When I go or close to double eagles one I share them in a really frustrated competitive again before be Dutch and a stretch most of them so the average leg stretch and the alignment goes up as a close go closer and closer to to that same scale. So Or the question is. If I use a constant don't know what rates I see that when I try to match stresses she. It seems today words. At the gum are because one which is sort of a she had taken in behavior which is not exactly what we see in experiments for the for the an aggregation so. That's why this has happened so clearly the assumption that the constant turnover rate and the kid being constants may not necessarily be true so he hypothesized that since the ants actually better themselves the born it's the nature of the Born This is coming from their tires implies that have these frictional force us so we have but so is that what if they can sense if they're being stretched a lot and detach faster so if they're so good he said can the detachment lead now be a function of course. So Or do you have a model for that we said OK So we have a bellows law in the microscopic scale for cells where the detachment is a function of force and it goes up exponentially like that so we. Model that is macroscopic in nature now for the ants where the dash in a similar equation and as you see it EVER seen as a sensitivity but I mean that meaning how sensitive are the force you've ever seen a small even for a small force needed to actually diversity the sense of really easy when you ever see those large in there really less sensitive of the force the they need a lot of force before they can start responding to it so clearly in the question that I was shown before now kiddie is not constant anymore but a function of the stretch in the next. So to actually test if this this works we went back to the experimental results and started out playing. Here and first and showing again what happens if I have constant put it and then you see thickens But then as a piece the sensitivity. Decrease. I see it starting to shit then because as a play I'm faster and faster sure it's the ants are the model predicts that they sense them and the respond by betting faster so you see that it's the cross it goes down and then you get a fit. And as you know that's twenty two times the weight of the end so what we see there I'm showing is the distribution of the leg stretch So initially when there were not considered a force if you stretch them really fast they're going to be at a large lead they're going to be stretched and are going to be elastic going up showing a shift to get in but then when I have a stretch sensitive detachment I see that the distribution is able to rearrange itself. So to summarise. Look at the basic aspects of dynamic networks and I played them to the case of the ant educations and the simple feedback mechanisms Lake sensing the tension and increasing the don't know of it and then to decrease the density Reus and so actually seem to explain how they are here so. This is a really good inspiration to sort of. Understand the individuals be here to to do. Short collective emergent behavior which we can learn a lot from and play two different. Synthetic it up with matter to have self healing or morphogenesis and swarm intelligence and so on so of thank you and begin to question.