Join me in welcoming Beatrice Mtetwa to our states thank. YOU THANK YOU. Thank you. THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. And I turn the program over noun to Charlayne Hunter. Thank you Voice or and you've heard from everybody now except Beatrice so I'd actually like to start with her because. One of the things that I have found in my trips when I was still based in South Africa I would come back from the United States and cry what was going to put them away and people would look at me like I had lost my mind because they still had the image of the. Transition from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe and the role that Robert Mugabe play in their minds and thanks no thanks to our U.S. media. There had not been a lot of attention paid to Zimbabwe sense it became a Democratic state country and so I've had the over the years to try and help people understand. That the Zimbabwe in their mind is not the Zimbabwe that exists today and that is one of the reasons I am so thrilled that bitterest and Ted is here and I heard her talk herself yesterday about those early days of freedom and democracy in. The way. And I would like her just briefly to recount her own role in welcoming the Zimbabwean democracy and then maybe just ease into what it's like today so that we can engage the rest of the panel but you were among those who had a welcoming for democracy welcoming to democracy right yes our men richly everybody in that time was. On a high because the majority of us were happy that a president who had his party had won the elections I was a student at the time in Edinburgh and we organized probably. The biggest and longest celebration party we got all the students from Glasgow from. We were that happy about. His ruling party winning and we had reason to be because he is an articulate man he is a very bright man. And in his independent speech he said all the right things he spoke of reconciliation long before it became empires way in South Africa he made it very clear that there was not going to be any richer abuse in and that everybody in Zimbabwe should work for the common good of Zimbabweans going forward and that we should all work together and in fact in his first cabinet we had a. Range of people in the cabinet we had the he is former falls in that have been so I mean we all believed that it would really get better and so in a graduate hurt. Us. I did working in Zimbabwe I worked as a prosecutor for the government and you know we went through the motions planes would. Where every third day shoot but. With the problems in the southern part of the country which And with the ACMA I'm acknowledged at the time. In fact there was a pretense that everything was played on OK So only those of us who had friends who came from that particular region where aware of what was going on and that something was going on also became clear because suddenly there were detentions without trial. Even if you could say arrested was a law passed which gave the minister the power to really had mean to you to believe there was a ministerial certificate against me the courts couldn't give you bail and it became quite clear that you know there wasn't a subversion no for the Constitution say and about what time was that that this was in Turn around turn around nine hundred eighty three eighty four eighty five but for me what became stark and personal was a case that I dealt with in one thousand eighty five cents a prosecutor I prosecuted for members of the ruling party who had. Been charged with political violence against a member of Bishop Missouri was cut and they do what they had done to this woman and her kids for me. Really were so despicable that they ought to go to have gone to jail what did they do and they had made this woman after preaching at take off her clothes in a township called Marvel who they made here or her clothes and carried them on her head and then walk in the townships. Naked naked with two teenage sons behind it and I mean under African culture that's absolute taboo to see your mother naked even in the house I think they're running through a. Naked walking the streets of a township with a crowd looking I thought that was so despicable that it ought to really be. Dealt with severely and they did get sentences of between eight months and twenty four months but they way pipes and after spending one to one thousand jail. And I never would have discovered this if face hidden or it's you know. Made one of their few specimens a complainant in a case that was that I was to deal with the following week way this man had been fired unlawfully from his work and made the time it was a criminal offense to hope to just fire someone from work without due process so we were going to. Prosecute them ploy of the following week and then I completed my forms for this man to be brought from jail to be a witness and the prison officers came back and said all sorry those guys want to spend one night and I thought it was a mistake now you were working for the governor I was going to try for the government and on the day of the trial the guy came in and I said why are you not in jail and he actually loved me with a smile on his face and. This is not good. And that's when I said you know I don't think I can continue to be part of this because this is not just and the magistrate abjured before who is the one we had with the case previously just you know said don't worry and he this employer pleaded guilty you were supposed to do two to be ordered to reinstate this person to pay him a. Salary for the period of unlawful. You know dismissal and. Also to pay a fine the magistrate just said OK you've pleaded guilty Mr Sorenson we are bad men we don't do that in Zimbabwe anymore. But your question discharged. Which to me was like what's going on here and when I see me said Well I mean he's not going to get justice in my court because if you believed you know what happens justice he would be in jail such importune wrongs can't possibly make it right it's you know I mean. You know he's entitled to see how this system should work he said well he should go to the same people who released him for his type of justice and this might be straight as an ex convert and he had fourteen the war for liberation I mean for me that was when I said I'm sorry I'm not going to be part of this because it's like I'm really aging in a best in a system that's breaking down and how many years into the democracy was this this was eighty five eighty six for four or five years five years or so then you became then I then left government intervention to private practice and then from around nine hundred ninety seconds and treated. And rights work I want to get some more details from you in a moment but let me just quickly ask John when I interview F.W. de Klerk years just prior to the. Multi-racial democracy coming to power I said how's it going to feel after all these years and power to be out of power and you know what his response was he said well we're not going to be out of power long because a liberation movement has never seen. Seated at the government now what Beatrice is telling me about this ex combat who is now you know. Going against the law is this typical I mean with F.W. de Klerk right about these liberation movements and speaks particularly of Zimbabwe and then maybe broaden it out. Beatrice Mtetwa is a Democrat but she's a Democrat of a particular stripe she's a Nelson Mandela Democrat Nelson Mandela was willing to come out of jail after twenty seven years in honor of the rule of law above anything else that gave him the foundation it seemed to me to manage the transition in a way that was acceptable to all stakeholders in the case of South Africa it was a very different psychology than has prevailed and that's the great tragedy of Zimbabwe. Jeff what do you think about that I mean you've observed Zimbabwe for how long now. Almost a decade and I'm really dating myself now that you have that long but it's interesting because when you talk about liberation parties and the issue of power in in just Southern Africa a liberation party has never lost an election ever in the region you look at Mozambique you look at maybe the South Africa Zimbabwe they've never lost and within the region the value had at the fifteen countries in the Southern African Development Community only three countries have had actually a political turnover in the executive. And Zambia the others it's either the same person in the Garveys case or does two centers case and go for the same political party so it's it's important to remember that Zimbabwe it's a horrible situation it's horribly or process but it's also not an anomaly in the region you know you have this you have this larger narrative of political elites. Under power at any cost and going back to Beatrice was saying about you know the early days of Zimbabwe Democracy there was a lot of hope you know Mugabe has championed international game in D.C. He gave a round of talks at Howard University at other colleges he was a guest of Jimmy Carter President Jimmy Carter at the White House you know there was international fanfare surrounding surrounding this man but at the same time he was giving this great this great independence speech was already working with the North Koreans on the ultimate end of being what some called the genocide and the much of the land area so by we were upwards of twenty thousand people were killed I think Samantha Power covers it and her book A Problem from Hell about the U.S. response or lack thereof to genocide So from very early on you started seeing the warning signs with what God was involved with Syria how long have you been observing Zimbabwe in particular and do you have been a sense of what made that change was it always there or you know going back to the liberation movements not being able to successfully function as a democratic in a democratic space what do you think about that on two thousand and five I was actually living in South Africa and Operation Murambatsvina was occurring where seven hundred thousand people were displaced internally in Zimbabwe in an effort to disperse an opposition party's political base back out into the rural areas where it would be harder for them to mobilize and and vote and I came back to the U.S. Much like your experience and I was raging and railing about this terrible human rights crisis that occurred and I know when you when I was talking about let alone where Zimbabwe was on a map. So I've been involved for close to fifteen ten years now as well and. So you know in regards to it a lot of it is just it's you know when you first come out as a liberation here and you. You gained this freedom for your country it gave you a lot of autonomy and authority to do what you want and you had earned your stripes you had fought the fight you had fought the battle you had stood up to the colonial authorities and they gave you a lot of legitimacy as a ruler and that is still what is played today in regards to if you're not a war veteran in some way if you have not had that legitimacy to your political history is very challenging for you to move forward into to challenge the ruling party in any way but governments have also had to shift away from that and become creative and so you'll see them also finding ways to replant repress other groups in a way that it's not dissimilar to what happened here but L.T.V. groups and sexual identity individuals are often targeted as a way to sort of say like this is western culture this is not human rights this is an A bomb an abomination this is you know against the rule of nature and are used to whip people up into a frenzy and you know we actually had seen this here in the U.S. in the two thousand and the George Bush campaigns and this is something that is often used quite a bit on the continent as a way to distance people and to retain power and to show that there is a differentiation between us and them between the west and between African rulers so there's the legitimacy of having Ben liberation hero still has some play it's just lessening particularly among youth which is the biggest demographic population bubble on the continent and so there is some of a shift into how also to maintain that political power remind I'm coming to you now Deborah but John will say this but because I know he. Maintains the most optimistic view of South Africa but we'll talk about that in a minute but the current president South Africa Jacob Zuma who heads the ruling. Party has said that the African National Congress which is the ruling party will rule to Jesus comes and that goes back to what you were just saying that the liberation movements tend to think they have authority in. Perpetuity but Deborah I was going to ask you a particular. Just mentioned was. The women of the Women of Zimbabwe Arise What role have the has the women have the women played in Zimbabwe and are they treated any differently you think then others because there were women in the movement in the in the in the in the liberation struggle you know you're absolutely right and I think what we're seeing here is just a steady a power that can take those characteristics is the power always are the same regardless of the social or political context so you have disenfranchised groups come into power and then unfortunately create an elite. That can be an reinforces making and other like you were talking about someone else becomes other they oppressed group so in the case of women. Certainly in Zimbabwe but in other parts who were like hand in hand shoulder to shoulder then once the power came it was difficult for it to be shared and so therefore a lot of times even though in many countries in Africa because intuition is a lot more liberal than say in the United States as relates to carving out roles of women making sure it's part of the Constitution I think in the United States you have the few Thewlis women in. Power and then in any many of the African countries in particular Rwanda is South Africa and others exactly but I believe that it's simply that women continue to hold the tension in the country in terms of between the power in the elite and the human rights work to still needs to be done through the organizing efforts of the civil disobedience. So lifting up and supporting leaders like. This I think without strong women who are under continue to undergird that civil disobedience and quest for a truly democratic society then we will probably see. You talked about was earlier Tell me a little bit about how you see their actions and. How they're being responded to and stop it and yet. As Beatrice knows full well having represented them in the. Corridor amazing organization founded in two thousand and three by by two women who are still leading the organization today are founded eleven years ago I think the current. Current Director General Williams has been. Detained over fifty to. Fifty times over a ten year span she's been imprisoned detained oftentimes. Physically and it's the largest group having worked on the continent in the region for a while to my mind is the largest grassroots organization that I know. That was eighty thousand women across the country percent ten percent and it's you also you do have women positions even within the government occurred vice president is a woman though if you've been following events in Zimbabwe it's really interesting where President Mugabe's wife is now very front and center putting her face out there she's currently on a nationwide tour where she's attacking the vice president who happens to be a woman so there's a lot of talk now that when there's an appeals Congress party happens next month you're going to say she was on a nationwide shopping tour because that's when most of. She became lady she does most of her shopping abroad. But yes so there's a lot of rumblings now that a lot of the die. When I was falling in a place where you might see. The stage set for. Present McGovern's wife to essentially take the reins of the country let me ask you Beatrice about that there's so many questions I want to ask you about the kinds of things that are going on that you've been challenging. But in particular I'm curious about the fact when I covered Zimbabwe there was a burgeoning alternative party that was that was being formed to challenge the government and they've had now what two or three times to do that what what's happening with those who see things as you do constitutional you know and herons to the constitution and so forth so are they gaining any strength and influence in the country but I mean for the fest's to elections they can be no question that their position one that was popular That was Morgan Chang around and that was the party's. His party M.D.C. and the women for democratic change and which probably is the reason why that the violence continued but most parties enough. M.D.C. suffered from the founder syndrome when it became quite clear that in a large portion of members of that party we're not very happy with the leadership their leader wouldn't even listen to to to any changes in the structures and the only change that he could think of was you know if you don't agree with where do things I kick you out of my part so even with that information we saw that the democracy pairs wasn't playing out their way you expect an open invitation that calls itself a movement for the most. Tried to change to be here into any democratic principles as a result it is severely weakened because there was a split in two thousand and five they head then another break away party happened around two thousand and eight two thousand and nine and this year he has been fed the split which started last year so we have with many M.D.C. parties is. Their factions really and so we are seeing the one side trying to create some form of coalition but I'm not. Confident that that will come up with anything meaningful anyway. It's incredible how when you look at. Oppressed people how they tend to to. Actually adopt what the press of state against them because this break ups we're talking about have been accompanied by violence. The same party members beating each other up the very same people that we were defending being beaten that we're now beating each other up and they were now coming to us saying defend us against this guy have said look guys I'm sorry if you guys are Democrats and they are being beaten up that's the democratic way of doing things in your party I'm not getting involved because for me as spent fifteen years trying to defend these guys from the excesses of the dominant party and they're now doing exactly the same that has been happening and talk about some of those excesses because some of them are pretty egregious. But I mean. Enjoyment of pets that they give themselves they were in the last government with their with them die with the government require help you to to have. The truck and packs that go with with being in power in Africa the perks here. They were. Quite happy to take some of the things that they used to criticize when their outside power is being and necessary in a country like Zimbabwe where they. Really on its knees and of course there were the pesky indiscretions of some of the leadership that. A lot of people wonder if this is the type of leadership that we want I mean with regard to women. Jeff has referred to Women of Zimbabwe Arise and they are indeed a formidable you know group to contend with we have many many women leaders. In Zimbabwe in positions of authority but they are there. On Thames dictated to by the men and the men of course are not going to get powerful women to be in powerful positions because they want the kind of woman in those positions so they can control what about the vice president the vice president today by Robert Mugabe she didn't get in there by being voted in there but I mean we didn't mind that because she deserves it she. Is a hero you know of the liberation war and we thought that this was going to lead to her being a president now we have a Constitution which says if something happens to the vice president becomes the president had till the next elections so it's quite obvious that they don't want me anywhere near there in case something happens and she becomes president and the most incredible thing is that it is women who are in the forefront of saying get rid of. You know and you say to yourself as women we do in this day and say why no fuss should become president the very same political leaders who really ought to view saying it's reman we think we might do better they're the ones we're saying is really saying it's it's a Absolutely said Is this something though that creates this do you have in the sense of that something that would create what would be a truce is describing I mean you do have the women of was who are who are strong in opposition but is it the violence is it what is it do you think. In regards to women trying to remove other women from power. That are used to do rape crisis work and as an attorney I can tell you if you have a rape case you do not want women on the jury women are incredibly judgment all of them are women. And it is it's a challenge so I you know I don't know necessarily. Why the movement has to take mature out is being led predominantly by a lot of other women other than the juror has been around for quite a while. And Grace is fairly clearly being backed by her husband. In order to be making the push that she's making so it might also just be you know jumping on the bandwagon effort mature as Beatrice pointed out you got where she got because Mugabe put her there and show you follow the lion that is being backed by the power and if it appears that she is not in fact anymore and Grace is the one being back then you just shift your allegiance because that's also where the perks will go. But you know what is actually truly of an annoying reason I mean I can't say Beatrice has the better authority to speak as somebody who. Currently living there Jeff were you trying to yeah I was going to say I think the other point the other important thing to consider when you talk about democratic movements and women and when you're living in a country in which eight out of ten are living on less than a dollar a day oftentimes when women are taking care of their families you know and they're made concerns we're going to get water to them how am I going to put food in the stomachs of my of my children how am I you know how much you get these basic necessities how are we going to have access to these basic services so I think obviously there. Are elsewhere it's not I you know we can sit up here and talk about you know democracy and liberty and freedom of expression and freedom of association but what does that mean to the average woman on the ground so part of my work and one of the issues I've been very much involved in is you know making those those linkages So go into the rural areas and engaging with local communities to make it to make those connections between access to basic services and how that relates to good governance how that relates to no one knows their main concerns are for their main concerns and the mouth and making it through the next day and their children so I think I think energy is spent is spent elsewhere and I think that might be the cause one of the causes of the deficit. Let me go back to Beatrice on another topic because you've alluded to this and those of you who on this panel look at this kind of thing all the time but give us some examples because I've heard you talk about some of the egregious violence against people in Zimbabwe. Tell us a little bit about that you've been the subject of that kind of violence or the victim of that kind of violence yourself but give us some examples of some of the kinds of things that the ruling party and the government perpetrates on people they deem as as critics or even people who just speak out. But give us some examples of some of the extreme violence which isn't so extreme Actually according to how often it happens tell us about some of it but in the documentary you see some of the victims with the physical injury and injuries you know. Suffered at the hands of. The perpetrators of the violence what kind of physical emotional fate they face a lot of torture. That goes on when you get arrested instead of being taken to a police station you were taken to torture chambers were really a whole lot of things happened to you. That Jeff referred to earlier. Is a peace activist who was abducted in fact refrigerator was a bat and for three weeks she was being tortured. Under the soles of being made to near. Concrete that was cutting on. Denied basic amenities. Thankfully she was not raped in two thousand I dealt with. Election violence because I brought a lot of the election challenges and the number of women that I interviewed with traumatized because their husbands. Were members of the opposition the numbers when credible I mean the one woman's husband had been made to sit on a hot stove so that has to have his bomb was just that way and she herself was abducted and she had a lot inserted into her private parts and the men who are. That simulator sexual intercourse using the law as a result she had to have a hysterectomy because she was her view any damage by that I mean that those are just some of those that I have. Only seen and they've been medically contaminant and a lot of the women in Zimbabwe been sexually assaulted do not have the freedom to speak freely about that because it has a lot of consequences. Your husband can say I don't want to because you've been raped to your home so even where women have been sexually assaulted they were actually rather not say it a lot of the women said Can I speak to you in private and they'll tell you yes this is what happened to me this is but I don't want it to come out publicly because if it does my marriage might be at stake so you can't prosecute so so you find you can't do much about that because I mean if she's not willing to publicly say this is what happened to me you know you can only rely on violence social physical nature where you can see where she was in debt even when this very very clear medical evidence of a sexual assault still drive or not but even you had some exposure to torture when you were in arrested right well I've just been. Through this really. Like that kind of torture kept away. You know I mean the first three instances of my being beaten up it was like the first one was just overnight and the second one was just over an hour and they were done with us which is easier to deal with because you know you are then able to immediately go and get medical attention and also to. Needs to be done but for you my Jory of the victims out in the rural areas they were very little access to amenities or even to have it and by the time that it will help maybe two weeks later and of course all saw the social issues that arise from some of these things they don't have that I have to say this is what is happening to me I don't want to dwell on this too long but but I think what is important to get into the psyche of Americans in particular is the extent. Of what is going on in these countries like the Zimbabwe now I'm sure it happens elsewhere we might talk about that but I just before come to you John let me say Are you particularly look at the issue of torture right in tell us a little bit about what you're finding. On the political violence that occurred in the aftermath of two thousand eight. Elections Amnesty International documented two hundred fifty murders twelve thousand victims of violence including torture and twenty eight thousand individuals displaced from their homes so tortures me what do you mean. It ran the gamut. Of government state agencies set up torture camps and a lot of these were in schools and rural areas and individuals were forced to come to the camps they had to sing songs that were in support of the government they were beaten the following which is the beating of the soles of the feet. When you hear it it I mean it kind isn't even sound that bad like I don't understand what's happening but the soles of your feet are actually very tender and if you beat them repeatedly you can cripple somebody at the very least make it impossible for them to walk for quite a period of time. People beaten so. Obviously that their skin was stripped away it was there were documents documented cases of sexual violence however as Beatrice noted. It is completely unclear how much that occurred because people didn't want to disclose. Just one hit with a club that was documented as one of the twelve thousand because she was still beaten as a result of the election violence so. There has been a long history from the maskers a month about the land in the eighty's you know through the. Occupation there is have been a long history of impunity in Zimbabwe where people are just not held to account and so you can get away with doing whatever you want including you know what Beatrice noted in her opening story of the individuals who forced the woman to to walk through the townships naked all the way through to you know the president and. And multiple others who have committed pretty egregious crimes and are not held to account there's quite a culture of impunity and Amnesty does do a lot of work on torture and we have worked on some way on that issue the U.S. small to other countries it's one of our largest campaigns does anything happen as a result of your investigations and putting this out into the into the public. Will we have secured release of individuals from Guantanamo because our government disclosed finally that they had committed torture and containing and confessions but we have pushed governments to ratify the Convention Against Torture and I've had a lot of success with that and fortunately not some bob way. They are not a signatory of the convention against torture but we have pushed into a lot of work so there is a section in the new constitution which states that I think is Section fifty three that you have the right to be free from torture cruel and inhumane treatment so you know you keep pushing at it and you just don't stop and hopefully eventually we will. Well why we don't torture Jon you want to say something I did want to say a brief word about progress because I don't want to be naive and celebrating the city and courage of Beatrice and correct what but the two thousand and thirteen election was peaceful on the day of election as opposed to it was the situation by the way in Zimbabwe as opposed to the situation in two thousand and eight now by former C.E.O. John Hardman is here will remember that the Carter Center did not observe either election because we couldn't get enough political space in a situation that would be conducive to observing however. The African Union and the sad act regional bloc did observe and what they've been pressing the grain is that reasonable Sadek is the Southern African Development Community they send their governmental representatives because they were really concerned about the spillover effect of violence on Election Day even though there was a lot of hidden violence in the in advance of the election. This is a complicated game that's evolving with the willingness of African states to increasingly get involved the internal affairs of other African states I've watched as over my lifetime it's going to slowly but progress is being made what the Carter Center does and with Georgia Tech's help and I want to stress the fact that Georgia Tech contribution to the processes of opening up a greater understanding. Of the hypocrisy of the evil hypocrisy of same gobby who wants to pretend that he signs up to all these international obligations and then performs differently with Georgia Tech has given us a software that would allow us in our election observations when we can get in observing this pressure on governments to let more and more observers in to look at the gap between the rhetoric and the principles of international law and the performance and as you process that data and you can build a case what we're finding is that the African Union and sad act for their own self interests are. Increasingly willing to be a little bit more Beatrice not as much as we would like but a little bit more pressuring on the governments that are holding these kind of events to stop the repression because the violence spills over to the neighbors creates the refugee problems there is progress underway and so I wouldn't want to leave this conversation Charlayne as you know without encouraging those students in the audience to think that there's something to work on here going forward OK I have written about. The country's entire continent forty eight or fifty four How do you want to count them. Taking baby steps to democracy and that we need to as you are encouraging us to be a little more understanding. And patient but how law I mean we look at our own history and how long it took and I don't want to go there now and that's not going to talk about but are we expecting too much or in this day and age should these democracies be getting into their more mature steps and observing constitution no guarantees are we expecting too much well I never expected South Africa to become a constitutional democracy where the rule of law still prevails of Jacob Zuma changes the Constitution or the A.N.C. was to abrogate the protections that are based on the rule of law in South Africa and there's a danger of that there's always a danger of that that I would despair I am optimistic about the willingness of African states to hold increasingly each other more accountable for their own reasons but the role of civil society is the members of this panel have reminded us and we remind ourselves at the Carter Center all the time have to be an integral part of this and having a voice like Beatrice Mtetwa. Remind us of our obligations in this regard there was a comment by Mary Robinson last week that when men meet with the elders when the elders when men need to put took they talk about the sharing of power when women meet they talk about the sharing of responsibilities and I think that's a very nice way to think about what I think we all collectively share but all we can do is keep pushing at the margins Well let me ask you this though I come to you in one second but you talked about this landmark ruling in South Africa yes that South Africa can prosecute Yes people who come to to war in the South Africa from Zimbabwe committed crimes give them away. But how has the South Africa's role been in term in its relationship to Zimbabwe other than this I mean this is landmark this is great but has it been as strong as it could be in pressuring or is the South African say pressurizing Zimbabwe to get a grip you know and you know and I know going back history and I won't belabor this now but when the initial of events happened after two thousand South Africa got a land problem just like the Zimbabwe and by the way if Lionel Reagan had won in one thousand eighty I've had Zimbabweans tell me that Jimmy Carter would have done the land willing buying willing seller and might have a different history so that explain what you're OK about well I'm going I'm talking about is that that there was a vital national interest to South Africa not to have the land issue become polarized and lead to escalating racial tensions within within in South Africa that's and that means giving the so they were using great glossary in the land for what they were using already gloves and prickly my dear I've got to say this about America's stakes in this region I worried that the race war in South Africa in the one nine hundred eighty S. was going to polarize race relations in this country of the United States of America that was our vital interest even though in richesse injure wanted us to believe. It was a Simon town's strategic base and Aslaksen in the east west confrontation so these are ongoing struggles that we have in finding that balance between human rights and sovereign rights but South Africa's role is why I put something I think as your old one has and then to be not as assertive as you and I would have liked and preferred but what we see in this constitutional court decision two weeks ago is another step in the right direction which America cannot take by the way because we don't belong to this International Criminal Court because our legislature allow us to in fact join the international community in a more progressive stand Jeff you wanted to say and I'm coming to get like thirty seconds and then get into it I think it's really important to remember that piece called does not mean free fair and credible and unfortunately the term peaceful has become the gold standard for elections and in Southern African I would argue Africa writ large at the same time there is some progress being made who's the current chairperson of the Southern African Development Community its president who is the incoming chair of the African Union that's President Mugabe So while there are some small steps being made I think you know there are some serious problems that are says and to answer your question I think no it's not it's not we're not asking and I think it's insulting to Africans writ large to say. You know we should hold them to similar standards of living every single serve even the most recent survey by Africa barometer which by. The corner you know across the board is one of the most highly respected institutions in Africa seven out of ten Africans across the continent say they want democracy and they think it's the best form of government there's a benefit in percent increase of the composite index the man for democracy in Africa fifteen percent increase over the past ten years so they're yearning for this but you have people in power that are that are stopping you know happening I think it's very very dangerous to to to equate peaceful with free fair and that's true as by all accounts two to two thousand and fourteen elections last year in Zimbabwe were fundamentally great. Well suppose it was a selection. But I want to read it to say that an election is a process not just in the event or in the day on the elections and what happens you know leading to the election is as important as what happens on the day that the elections take place in Zimbabwe for in says they are the political parties fought and fought and fought and up to today they have not had access to the voters roll determines whether or not people who are supposed to vote actually on the voters' roll and whether they actually. Voted and that's absolutely crucial if you are going to have democratic elections that hasn't happened the space leading up to the elections for those who are not in control of state to purchase were simply not there if you attend on the only television station in Zimbabwe which is state controlled you would only see one political party so just access to the electorate wasn't day and day despite the law saying they should cover everything you know so that the fact that no blood was built on Election Day That's not on its own really translate as Jeff says to free and fair elections but more importantly side that itself that Southern African grouping has basic minimum standards on how elections should be conducted and there ought to be you know it ticking all the boxes so that they have a read through and a body. They don't reference True True True True True True that in Zimbabwe has only been able to be compliant on those principles on just regularity mainly you know they hold elections every five years but whether or not. All the other principal reside here too is never interrogated by any of the leaders in the region and it's for a good reason because you know if you say my elections are not free and fair and next year I have a new elections in my guys are coming to toot toot toot toot to observe your elections of course you want my neck I want my elections to be free in sight so you have this change you know that is really looking after each other's interests in the region with absolutely no regrets what they themselves have have him agreed to at just reset briefly to this to the pace that the president is referred to where the constitutional court in South Africa has forced the South African government kicking and screaming one of the organizations that places one in real time involved trustee that we brought that up the case in many many years and last two thousand and eight that thing with the government and it is the government that appears every ten because they did not want this to happen it is only the constitutional court that is going to that is forced. To do it but politically there has been no will to deal with the violence in Zimbabwe when they go to South Africa despite the Fed that is a signatory to their own statute so that SES anyone who commits human rights abuses are free when they are in your jurisdiction deal with them they have not wanted to deal with them and they are being forced by the courts to do it. I'm not so sure that in twenty years have been even get that kind of decision from the constitutional court in South Africa because you can see there are ten to. The judiciary in South Africa as we speak. What about the quid pro quo she just described that the. Leaders in the surrounding countries are affirming the thought that Zimbabwe in the next is because they don't want them coming they're. Casting aspersions on their own in that sense do you see that when you go and observe of course there's nothing that we disagree in but what Beatrice's genius has been is to find that space when she can operate within Zimbabwe and what we're also seeing at the regional level is a new opening of the political space which is not as large as we would like but if I believe my colleagues at the electoral institute for Southern Africa and now the Electoral Institute for sustainable democracy and in Africa I saw they provide technical assistance for the African Union delegations of election observations and their standards are rising faster than the cost for the SAT the regional sub regional Rexx or regional organizations there is a dynamic going on which is not as fast as we would like but there is something that is changing that is making it more and more transparent and accountable as a criteria for having neighbors taking care of neighbors I wish I could say a little less romantically than that but that's the way that I think the pragmatic politics and the idealistic ideals that we all aspire to may be converging but we have to work at it all the time and that's why a non-governmental organizations like the Carter Center and an amnesty or the or the Kennedy Center are really important we're talking about elections now but I want to go back to something Sara raised earlier and I think Zimbabwe has been joined by any number of African countries on the issue of L B G T rights lesbian gay you know home sex who writes What are you seeing in that regard there it's it's very serious in that and in Zimbabwe is that not right and there's actually other countries where the crisis is as much worse and. There is an organization. And some By the way called gay and lesbians some calls. And they are predominately targeted around election time so as a way again to amp up their rhetoric they are one of the many organizations that were targeted between the end of two thousand and twelve and the middle of two thousand and thirteen when the elections occurred where offices were raided they were arrested. But a lot of the time there's just the sort of low level. Disdain industry guard for the L G B T population and some by way as opposed to an actual targeting the laws against homosexuality are not often. Implemented or prosecuted in some way but we've seen quite a rise in other countries where particularly concerned about Cameroon Uganda. They Gambia is also in the process of increasing the penalties and their legislation for. Gauging and homosexual relationships in nature we've seen a lot of mob mentality a lot of attacks of people who are either gay or perceived as gay or who are allies. So there has definitely been a push and a and effort to further marginalize the population and amnesty characterizes it under our anti discrimination campaigns where it's just yet another level of discrimination that occurs against a group that has been marginalized culturally and historically and in fact to speak to that we can leave out the role that the West and just write plays in investing in just a thousand dollars into the church is the rhetoric around the supporting interrogation organizing movement efforts and so that's another example of our. Intervention in this or I could say meddling in this really is fuel to some additional human rights violations of these groups. You have to come in. It's really interesting to have Sarah saying you know they these leaders in these countries touch this vitriolic rhetoric and like anti-colonial populist terms particularly around election but if you look closely a lot of laws in which they use to criminalize same sex same sex consensual conduct its colonial era laws clone Aristotle rise and what have you so it's really interesting they don't even realize the apostasy which these words that they're speaking you know really you know pounding their face on the table saying this is you know Western incursions into our culture when in fact the very means with which they used to criminalize this is clown era laws that are still on the books and I think we have to often remind them remind them of right I think it was in Uganda where there was a big strongly progressive response to the L B T population and then when the religious right came in that it managed to take it from up here down to here you know there let's go back to something I think that you John talked about U.S. policy. Toward Zimbabwe how would you assess it and should we should the United States be doing more I'm not advocating the use of drones like you said. I commented upon afterwards I was just drawing attention to the fact that the military instrument is used very frequently by the United States and in the case of Zimbabwe it would seem like there would be more of a need to be more interventionist in a political sense I don't want to take away from the hard work of embassies and others that have been over the years trying to pressure Mugabe but they are sensitive given the Steal strategic stakes are not deemed by Washington to be that high to the regional opinion so you have people lining up behind Sadek and very skillful at playing that game and he will send over a Beatrice Mtetwa just to show that it's really not that bad in Zimbabwe but fortunately she's able to navigate. Those waters in Illinois Well let's be clear he didn't send around here because he allowed overtime Our guest is Rick briefly before we go to the audience and you guys get ready and ladies get ready for your questions but do you have a comment on U.S. policy towards And by the way what it's doing right and what it's doing. Could be doing. But I just found the policy from the Western developed world towards a bit difficult to follow because when it became clear that the country was going off the rails there wasn't you know the kind of response that we thought should should should be day and when you know the Western world became critical those involved when it was when they with their family vacations so clearly impression that was created out there was that you are now talking about me because it's taking land from your and it's paid very very very much on that because it was like it's wild and they really were being mad at you know big deal but now that why farmers and you know who who will sanction you will do this and it has not. Their ordinary Zimbabwe. Who is the brunt of them every day excesses because if you look at the end I think the media was also largely to blame for that because instead of dealing with a human catastrophe that the famine Nations created by way of dealing with. Somewhere Else thousands of. Zimbabweans rules entire livelihood to on their family and nobody even wrote about them nobody can get any you did but the point is that the majority of people did not understand that this land was being taken. On the pretense that it would be given to the winds but. Hundreds of. Being evicted from those very same fountains Why did the law not say that the farm workers take the farms and run them because. You know if you took me to a farm now and gave it to me I would know what to do but those. Funds So I think. The foreign policy has been very difficult for me. Because it hasn't been consistent it has not been clear what it is meant to achieve an. Intervention sometimes. If you ask me know what the foreign policy is. Because I don't know I don't even know what it is also a lot of those farms were given to Mugabe's cronies as well. I said we were open to some questions and if you have them Would you please stand identify yourself and speak I don't know. Yet there's a mike out there thank you. For neighborhoods and communities here to work. With the. School. Herself has come out. To communicate. The need for that kind of partnership and the kind of partnership My question is about partnership with the Diaspora You know those of us who live in America particularly those of us who African-Americans are interested in being a part of the foreign policy dialogue. Those of us who say we in the Diaspora are not doing do we depend on public. So my question is can you. And you too John communicate about the role of the diaspora begin to reshape. Foreign policy here in the West. Beatrice but I don't know what influence you would have in shaping your foreign policy but I think as individual organisations there's a lot of room for collaboration I mean I went through the Senate yesterday and I saw the civil rights movement you know in a perspective that I had never seen before and I think if we had mentorship programs where actually a way young people could come and see that this is a process you don't just do something today and you'll get all the rights to morrow and that this pain along the way if they could. Get meant by the relevant organisation and they could come back and see that actually it is worth fighting this you know cause because in the long term the gains will be there maybe small you may not completely eradicate you know some of the problems that we have all over the world but if you just can creates in an atmosphere where people can enjoy basic rights enjoy a basic standard of living it would have been worth it and that more of us should do that so out encourage a lot of mentorship because of government and foreign policy there's a whole lot more at stake in very different considerations and I think that Beatrice made the point yesterday when she talked with a group of women leaders here in Atlanta that a lot of the young people in Zimbabwe today don't see the relevance of really getting involved and staying the course and she was saying that she thought that that could be something tart here about the American civil rights. Leaders especially the ones stay the course next question is there another question. Here. There's one OK. I guess you're going to have to raise your hands a lot of people with the my. Name is and I see some professor at the School of Economics. My name is I mean. It's a school of economics and my research focuses on civil wars and the effect of civil population can you just speak a little more about the. Depression and its effect on population difference from effect of let's say a liberation movement or a civil war. I mean how does it affect But you know it does affect human rights activists and people who fight against the government but. That's I mean is there a differential impact. Yeah. I think the context of the Bible is really interesting because you know you've had one person in one particular political party have thirty four years ago power so Robert Mugabe. Is this. They're completely interlocked and intertwined and I think the way in which they've been able to sort of you know through these various ways. Repress the entire country is that. You know through those means and we're talking about. What some would call genocide that happened in the early eighty's and the massive electoral violence that happened in the early two thousand and particularly post two thousand and eight and as I said my initial remarks at the podium you've seen a shift from that because these leaders like. Are clever you know they don't have to go out and necessarily be people over the head with you know but. Security agents and police. And military officials to your neighborhood before election you know what happened to your family members back during the last election we're still here. People are still in power so. Who is the current Justice Minister of our things was a former defense minister who perpetrated perpetrate the genocide and many of these other horrible horrible things happen in the country so when you see these people in power all they have to do is harvest the fear they just go out into the countryside and say you remember what happened last time we're still here we're still in power and we can so inflict pain on you have a common. You know. Difference that we have. The entire. You can say I'm going to rush to the courts for protection because. You know. If they don't want you to get to court you may not get. You know if you do get to court. And. Some of. That there will not be you. Went to the. Interview them and. We know where your kids go to school if you want to. You know what can happen to them he came back and he was. They didn't touch him but I mean when somebody. What more. To you that's just so frightening and they kind of do anything a boat in so the Zeebrugge I'm sure that this is. The lesson in this for people. Even the civil society. Intervening or. So just in terms of that the economics so the Civil War happened in Zimbabwe in the context of the liberation war and in the seventy's and since and there hasn't been a war and the government and the economy actually function fairly well up until two thousand but the backbone of the economy was the agricultural industry and when that collapsed through the nonuse of the farms and so many of them going follow the knock on economic effect is what you're currently seeing where there are I think to nine different official currencies that are accepted in Zimbabwe because there is no official Zimbabwean currency anymore in two thousand and eight two thousand and six seven and eight when the famine situation was so bad it's hard to mobilize somebody to step up and step out against their government when they are eating twigs and leaves and when as a parent you have to make the decision that day do I feed myself such that I might have the strength and the energy to try to go find work tomorrow and then have enough money to feed my children or do I feed my children today and not have them suffer from malnutrition and then I'm not weak I'm not strong enough to go try to find work tomorrow when you're making those basic fundamental life decisions it's very hard to mobilize to speak out against your government and the Mugabe regime has used that effectively as a method to control there's state resources are not used to build the schools up to provide adequate pay for teachers the medical industry has collapsed the in. The structure has collapsed in two thousand and eight with the cholera epidemic occurred four thousand people died needlessly of a disease that is treatable it's because the infrastructure had collapsed and this is part of the knock on effect of. Where seven hundred thousand people were displaced this is the same thing as taking the city of Detroit which arguably has already happened and just eliminating it you know seven hundred thousand people and this is their homes and their livelihoods and they're just burst in the rural areas and forced into these makeshift townships so there's not adequate sewage and ways to manage it and so people are forced to scavenge drinking water where they can get it and then the rains came in which then mixed the where they were going with inadequate latrines with the way to get their drinking water and you had a cholera epidemic I mean there's these are the knock on effects that not necessarily have to do with the actual civil war but from a government that consolidated itself after liberation movement and then focused on consolidating those resources for themselves at the sake of their population I think that's a really important thing to remember I've been told to thousands of babus it was in that export of food they were feeding because essentially your situation I would to have a million people are in dire need of emergency food assistance from Your World Food Program so it's you see that's one of the tracks. Raised a lot of the success stories from the state that was here today. Let me take about three more questions from the audience and then I'd like to have our panel wrap up with a good for you. I got marching orders up here so I want to be sure I don't offend. In the back who is that. Most former professor in the Overland call it's due to some perhaps other members of the planet would you describe the consequences. And Russian investment in symbol board. And as you do the. That address the U.S. policy because my experience in all of these countries is that increasingly as a while Americans are insisting on commitment to human rights the Chinese don't have a care about that in the world and as a result the Chinese seem to be really moving in all over the continent and not requiring governments to and here are two human rights standards because you want to comment on the bubble headed north to share Look East policy look east. By the government which basically said that we can you know stay with. Your sanctions in the West we. Are going to deal with all weather friends in the east many and basically China so we've had Chinese coming to invest in Zimbabwe for for the past decade certainly and have been given large tracts of mining concessions but unfortunately we have not seen the benefit of. Those investments because firstly I think all of you know that when the Chinese come to town they bring even their own wheelbarrow they bring their street they will not offer employment to any local so you know that investment is not going to create any employment anyway because they make these deals where they're able to bring everybody from from China. You also know that the labor practices that they. Engage in and not just the normal labor practices that you expect and in fact more often than not they. Don't comply with. The local labor laws so you have that problem of of them that even if they they do employ a few locals they will not pay them even the minimum wage in Zimbabwe has minimum wage across. Different sectors and they of course say China really doesn't care about human rights compliance you know they will not insist on certain basic standards before they can invest and because of that also it's follows that they really will not be bothered about ensuring that they run operations that are transparent I mean we have them involved in our family industry and nobody knows what has happened to the dam once I've been mining since they put the concessions and it's an area of concern but. In the last two or three months they also have been jittery because it is not clear who's going to be in power post them about it and therefore there is a fear that you know even they cannot invest as they have been doing and a whole lot of investments that we promised about three months ago. When a delegation went to to China all of those I generally on hold now we have Russia that has entered the fray we had a big Russian delegation vote Trix ago who also has promised to invest in. Zimbabwe and you can see the kind of friendships that we are keeping and how they probably will know you made them if you close by your people from time to time John are you seeing this around the Chinese influence around the rest of the continent and what is the impact of that on democratic principles and governance it's a big subject Charlaine and I'm trying to think of a quick way to give some insights. Because it's not a simple picture when we sent an observation mission to Madagascar there was the Chinese observer mission functioning ostensibly the same way as the rest of us Democrats are functioning we know that in Africa today this is again a subject for a future says the student work at Georgia Tech there is this alternative authours Tarion capitalist market to challenges the liberal democracy rule of law messy process of self correcting slow evolving political systems that they dressed in that way and we all are advocating And so how do you make sure that our alternative has greater force America's greatest strength is its soft power its gets back to the Asper a question that was raised earlier the fact that you have assistant secretaries of state from the United States who are African-American who have come through and have absolutely clear eyes about the realities of American history and they can advocate for democracy and rule of law and no person is above the law gives added force would this country support them more strongly that would be fine but it took the D. Asper a community to package up Solomon Northup's memoir and make it compelling to Americans to shed a new light on our own history so it is a very slow and messy process to challenge a China that it's much more quick to respond and intervene but is itself going through its own internal dilemma's and problems and that's what a course by the way the Carter Center tries to do is to open up both of those those areas and to have a project on Africa that would involve Chinese Americans talking with Africans about how do we move forward together because there is no possibility of a conflict over this that would be too horrendous to contemplate but even as China is beginning to have its own economic problems how is that going to effect its performance in Africa do you think Jeff. And you know doesn't me interesting to watch you know it's not just involvement but I cross the continent I would hazard to talk about it just help build. Headquarters in Ethiopia to help build the parliament in Harare I believe the military War College in Zimbabwe when you travel to the rural areas to really interesting in the region Chinese brothers on the streets in these you know these backwards places that you would never never expect to see them so it goes really deep and I really want to touch twenty seconds on the point that Beatrice made about. Diamonds in Zimbabwe recently in two thousand and six they discovered the largest diamond field in the world so it's a gift a gift from God and the Chinese came in a joint venture with this by way of military called the Zimbabwean mind of Development Corporation and I've seen estimates I don't know about you estimate about a billion dollars that has already been included potentially and diamonds every been mine from that area but have that one potential one billion dollars or forty five million has actually passed in Treasury. So where's that money go and clearly clearly I would argue that it's probably going in the hands of the Chinese and some. Military military. Planes also fighter planes Russia Russia. I said too much I said three to. One more over there and here two more one here and there. That my going to rant about. I was calling on you but you can go and then. I want to think upon our views and particularly Beatrice for courage my name is Dixon also made actually an undergraduate here. I'm a Nigerian. My question to you Beatrice is we have a huge African community. Across the school here in Atlanta you know all across the United States. Using Nigeria as a case study like we post. We have. To keep recycling themselves you know over and over again It's actually very hard for the youths you know to think that they can actually contribute to the development of the country you know because we have people ruled the countries in the seventy's and then they still keep coming back so my question is What advice do you have for the youth particularly after youths and how we can contribute to you know make our Impact. But if they use can over Muslims have to be a force to be reckoned with the same nudes in other parts of the well being the catalyst for change by really demanding to be head is a matter of right and I think. That should be possible because I don't think you have restrictions that we have. Absolutely no political will in Africa to let young people behead. Young people like women not to have those rights and I think it's up to the youth to demand those rights in the same way that. Those rights. Demand their rights for themselves not just to say we want to change an old man for that you must have a role to play in the country's affairs like every other. Right to quit more Yes My name is. Professor in the same one school of international affairs what you described for a simple reminds us of several other places in the world I take students to Southeast Asia so the country that comes to my mind for instance is Cambodia they are the prime minister who has been and. Our For many years clear connections to commit. Brutal crackdowns on protesters So my question to the panel given the spread of social media are you aware of interactions between civil society croupe since in let's say come. To these interactions exist you have a comment on that. Yes because from when you look at social movements and what works and what sustains itself certainly social media is an important to spark awareness will have yet to see how and when you think back to play to sustain resistance I think the Arab Spring as a great example there was a lot of promise around the role of social media because not being a tool for long term organizing resistance that it has to change is that we desire to. Have to say I saw on C.N.N. this morning that ISIS is recruiting people through social media any way that you had one final question here. Is there one and then we kind of close with one quick round of the panel. Trying to end on a positive know you talk about how they get the youth movement and then there are some positive things you mention including having labor laws that have minimum wage for for workers what are the positive things that someone in power has implemented over the last twenty five years that could be built upon to actually create a movement like you know if you don't mind I'll take your question. And put it into my final question because the Dean is looking at me so given what he has just. Let me go back to the Dean's words at the beginning of this session where she talked about hope. Emerging and prevailing now Beatrice aside from you and the people who work around you do you see any hope at all and where do you see it coming from. And if you don't be honest about that. Well Zimbabwe has a brand new constitution which has fantastic provisions covers the youth full participation full participation by women talks of all the second generation rights you know right to have all the things that were not there in the initial constitution so. For me I am thinking we can build on that and by ensuring that what the Constitution say's is complied with and I've already started working on challenges where I believe that you know. Women are not getting what the Constitution safe if you say and I think they used should also demand their rights that the Constitution says they have and it's pointless talking of economy can power meant in the Constitution when there is no infrastructure within just the next of parliament that deals with how you will empower these women so I am looking at that this new constitution as a positive chief tool that we can use to demand transparency in how our resources are being used and whether those resources should be used actually to empower everyone across the board even through the use of. A law where you see hope if you see any especially as it relates to Zimbabwe but maybe to yeah I think the point the Constitution is an excellent point and I was reading an article in the domestic press in Zimbabwe last night and I just say we have done it before as a government but they were undertaking this country to Sion aware. In this campaign but this was you know it's been since the Constitution is about the place it was passed by referendum and as Beatrice was saying you have these wonderful wonderful things they have the gender commission and anti-corruption commission Human Rights Commission but to my knowledge they're all there said in their name they exist in name only and that's a you know Africa has decided to take those replete with beautifully written conventions and treaties the principles guidelines that govern democratic elections for instance the African charter on human peoples' rights that very much mirrors the Universal Declaration of Rights so when these leaders like Mugabe stand up and say these are Western values or Western norms we know that's nonsense because if you compare the universal declaration of African charter they're very very similar and I think it's a matter of holding them to to their word you know it's a matter of implementation these things exist but we have to start we have to start implementing them and I think that's where the world South Africa comes and that's where the role of these regional powerhouse is coming down those the Son of God is the South Africans these relatively well performing Democratic states are playing the leadership roles that they should be instead countries like South Africa are supplying is an appeal with electronic monitoring devices and how to monitor people on Facebook on your question on social media so that's the problem and I think part of it to us but it's up to us to to stand these people we should be standing with the likes of President Obiang of. Who's been in power for thirty five years standing with the likes of Eduardo said I was the president of Angola who's been in power for thirty years we should be standing with Jacob Zuma as the. One the president of Ghana these are the people that are doing really great things on the card to sort of get lost in the mix of these are pressing countries. Certainly to believe in the really the impetus around the center fielder human rights to lift up the fact that the people that brings about social change it's people working together for collective action and you heard earlier that there was a group of women leaders. The most a man can be yesterday to meet with Beatrice and we have players to be one and we will use the resources of the center to the mentorship that she's talking about so the young people who do encourage for not only the young people fifty years ago of the American civil rights movement the young people throughout the world who are doing great words to bring about the change that we see. When I was teaching I would have students who were in their early twenty's and they would just say the world is so horrible and so or awhile. And it does seem so horrible when you're in your early twenty's and you don't have the ability to look back and see through this like longer channel of history where for my grandparents the concept of human rights didn't even exist the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is only sixty years old so if you look back at where we have come globally in that time frame we are moving in actually leaps and bounds and when you're in the midst of it it seems like you are moving in that my new show at a glacial pace through the end is just not going anywhere but we are moving and we are making differences and it's important that we raise up with those like the actress not only just in events like this but you know in every opportunity in every venue you can show these people realize that they are supported and that they're heard and that their work is acknowledged and that we do we can to keep them safe and that we keep pushing forward so human rights does matter and it does make change and we are moving forward and so for me my concept of hope is not just in Zimbabwe where you even house somebody who is the Minister of Justice who has committed very serious there allegations of very serious crimes that he's committed to he is against the death penalty so Amnesty International works with him to eliminate the death penalty in some way you can almost always find a common element. To work people and try to go far to advance human rights John I know you are eternally optimistic so let us know where you see the hope and how you see what has to happen for it to prevail. I can answer the bigger question Charlayne But the hope is rooted in this room I mean we've spent two hours two and a half hours talking about the internal affairs of a small state in southern Africa because it matters because it matters because we are organizing ourselves a planet around sovereign states where what goes on with inside peoples other sovereign states doesn't matter human rights are becoming more important than sovereign rights and for Georgia Tech to acknowledge this by bringing Beatrice and touchwood from Zimbabwe here and for us to spend time talking about this generic problem of rebalancing our planet around human rights from sovereign rights gives me hope. Thank you Jon I just want to add my love to think that the in I think that given what I said at the very beginning about our information about small countries like them bob way we need to demand of myself and other media practitioners that we provide you with the information that you need to make good judgments about the rest of the world because as I said at the beginning and as Martin Luther King often said we are wrapped in a single garment of destiny and what happens to be a tourist or any of the other activists in these countries working for human rights affects each and every one of us and you look at the a bowl a crisis and you know immediately. Or should know how anything that happens now in any part of Africa is a part of us too in some way or another thank goodness for him or university and the work that it did on the boat. Thank goodness for the club and the work that it does and the work that all of you do we are all wrapped in this thing going on and of destiny and I want to thank Georgia Tech for being aware of that and honoring a woman who is one of the leaders in the struggle for human rights in the world because if it doesn't happen in Zimbabwe it's not going to happen anywhere else THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU I feel obligated to say that one of the missions. Now in college is to connect the global to the local feel compelled to say that a twenty four team at the sesquicentennial war in the United States of America my personal comes from the fact that one hundred fifty years ago today I would have been considered not human and today I am the dean of the College of Liberal Arts and. Thank you Elaine I think that there is hope in that and what I want to do is a series of thank yous one to Charlayne hundred for being a wonderful Mark great MODERATOR Thank you to our panelists for carrying on such a wonderful discussion on such important and critical issues thank you. Chris. For being with the courageous woman that she is for holding the banner. Human rights under the condition that she does thank you. Thank you. Thank you.