Let's. Just say. Thank you Flavio for the introduction I don't believe Google scores. It's great it's great to be this NG physics Georgia Tech again. I think this is my fourth time in a school of physics my first time was in December of one nine hundred ninety four and I got to see Joe Ford So I'm really grateful that that happened and of course I'm very honored to. Be giving this Joseph Ford a lecture. I've had just so much fun today. I know a lot of people here and it's just so much fun to see everybody again and talk about what they're doing and science and so forth so I start my clock so I don't run over. I wanted to start with by talk let me go back and start by acknowledging my coworkers Annette Taylor who was at the University of Leeds but now it's a Sheffield Mark tensely it's with W.V.U. and our students Hong Kong Mon and Simba Russia. And of course the National Science Foundation so in the last. I guess six or seven years we have focused on discrete coupled couple discrete oscillators. And. And that's what I'm going to tell you about today kind of an overview of coupled oscillator work the story starts. With. Actually refereed this paper by Sylvia to Monte from some problem Sorenson from Copenhagen and their students and that's a wonderful paper in which they studied yeast. In a flow reactor and were able to do some fantastic experiments that I'll tell you about but actually the yeast system you know in earnest goes back forty years now to Aldridge and Pai who found that if you have a solution of yeast and you dilute that solution say with nutrient broth first of all when it's before you dilute it it's oscillating synchronously and you can follow the oscillations by looking at in A.D.H. because that's in vault in the glycolysis And so you can see these things oscillating synchronously synchronously as you diluted you reach a critical concentration a critical number density where these oscillations stop being synchronous and the and the signal goes flat so after Origin pi the yeast system became very you know paired to magic system for studying so all signaling because it's obvious that if there synchronized they're talking to each other but it's not understood was this transition from synchrony to unsynchronised behavior and it could occur in two possible ways these are these this is a figure from this periscope. HEGAN paper and this is one way it could occur say you're oscillating fine here and at time zero you dilute the medium so that the number density goes down what could happen is all of the oscillators could become Do you think when ised and because they're all out of sync the global signal showing in dark black is flat OK so that this is like a classic synchronization transition I've call it occur moto synchronization transition because she could curve motor was the first one that really figured out this critical critical coupling strength for the transition but there could be another possibility so you oscillating fine right here all in synchrony you dilute it below some threshold concentration and because the enter cellular signaling molecules change. Each oscillator changes state and goes to the stationary state and say if it saves spiral a focus station or state spirals in and so so it's a completely different type of. Mechanism and it was not known how this worked the. Parrots Copenhagen study showed pretty definitively for their conditions it was this this so called quantum sensing type mechanism the reason it's called quantum sensing is because there's a branch in physics that I'm sorry in biology that studies bacteria populations and when some bacteria get above a critical density then they switch states completely and one example is this viral fissure I that live in squid and they become chemical luminescent above a critical number density. Another example is the pseudomonas organ also which suddenly becomes a biofilm producer which can be important for human health and so this is a big topic big area in biology because it's very important that how these bacteria behave this yeast system is you know it's a different system but but it provided a lot of insights into this Quorum sensing transmission and phenomenon why is it called core because you need to have enough you know a high enough number density so it's like you have to have a core arm in the faculty meeting to you know to vote. OK So when we saw this I said. We should do this with these micro oscillators and because. It offers an opportunity to get some fundamental insights into into this transition and so our experiment is very simple I'll tell you about these micro oscillators in the next slide No I'm sorry. Well I left out one of my so. I'll tell you about that Mike Ross later is right now these are very simple to make their cattle and exchange resin beads that are about two hundred microns in diameter you load on the catalyst on to this be. The catalyst to the blue stuff Jabotinsky a solitary reaction and then you put this. Into a catalyst free solution and you have an autonomy little micro oscillator and in this case you have oscillator. Can communicate with the other oscillators through the solution now this blue software potentially reaction puts out two. Critical species into the solution run is the activator so-called promise acid and one is the inhibitor and so they communicate with each other through the solution and here you can see the picture we monitor this system both with an electrode electro chemical Ali And we also monitor it optically and you can see some of these beads are kind of bluish gray and some are red when they're blue they just reach the peak of their oscillation when they're red they're at the minimum and so here's a typical oscillation it's red red even those is black and white suddenly turns blue red red and so on so. So that's a very simple experiment we're able to freeze frame even though we're starting at three hundred to six hundred R.P.M. this this system using a shutter speed of four tenths of a millisecond one thing about this micro oscillator system is that allows you to have extremely large populations of oscillators like in a two by two Q. that you can have one hundred thousand oscillators communicating and so it offers a very nice opportunity to study commune. Later communication. OK so here's an example. Of what happens at a low exchange rate this is when we stir at three hundred rpm and we step up the density the number density of oscillators by this red line and you can see that. But there's a flat out noisy signal at a low number down city you start to see some oscillations then start seeing real oscillations and going it goes into full blown oscillations by the time you step the number density up to the maximum if you look at the electro chemical signal you don't have zero at this kind of noisy fly zone but some finite signal and then you kind of a smooth increase in the amplitude of these oscillations these are actually the electro chemical oscillations if you look at the the. Optic with the reconstruction. Of the oscillation from the camera you're looking at these red and blue particles the blue particles transmit light more and so you can also talk about the maximum in the oscillation of the optical signal and you see that it starts here nonzero at about zero point two and then goes up gradually and the period is just kind of flat. Here we see an example of the experiment. It's a little bit hard these are bubbles these That's a bead stuck to a bubble that we omit from our image analysis but there are blue ones that are going by and red ones and that's on the other side you see oscillations occurring. Now one can. Simulate the system we you know they're pretty good mammals for the B.Z. reaction to Soft have a tense cue reaction we use a model that I'm going to show you later called the Z B K E model from Jabotinsky and Epstein from brain. Dies and the reason we use it is because it allows a variation of the it shows variation of the period and our experimental system has a distribution in frequency and so we need to build that into our system and so this is what we simulate here is our global flat signal. Given by this these blue beads that and the catalyst is this oxidized blue catalyst here are the individual oscillators that are out of phase so they sum up to the flat mean and then you have this system becoming more and more synchronized the frequency being sharper and sharper until you have synchronization this is you know your classic cool motor like synchronization transmission and you can also look in order parameter this is a particular order parameters. Chena moto order parameter which basically just looks at the phases over the oscillators and. Gives you an idea of the order depending on whether they're all in the same face then your parameters close to one it is one if they're in the same phase or if they're all in different phases the order parameter is zero and this is the time average. OK so now we can go look at the system in a. Higher. Exchange rate and this is six hundred R.P.M. these are again explain experiments and we're going to step up the density like so and you can see that it's we have a flat signal and you know kind of flat once it settles down and then suddenly full blown oscillations and so in the electro chemical C.. No it's a zero until you have large up to docile ations basically from the reconstruction of the optical signal zero to full blown and then we have this all. Looks like what looks like period lengthening it's probably a saddle loop or a saddle node bifurcation we still have yet to completely sort that out. Here is the. The movie you saw that's when. They want it high density just also lated the one at low density has no oxidized loss leaders This means that all of them are in the steady state. OK So so this is this is really a very important set of experimental observations. Wait just a minute I think that we're going to see this thing off late once more. Here is the simulation and you know at the steady state zero frequency no frequency and then we start getting oscillations here and there basically all at the same frequency this should have more to occur more to order parameter really shouldn't isn't a political to the steady state so it really shouldn't be used there but but this is the quantum sensing type transmission versus the current moto synchronization type transmission so. And this is the model I'm not going to. Bore you with the chemistry behind it but basically here is our activator Roman SAS and our inhibitor bromide and here's our catalyst so it's a three variable model the activator and the inhibitor go to the solution and they affect their neighbor their effect their oscillators it's a glue it's a mean field coupling and the inhibitor. Oxidized metal catalyst is. Immobilized on to this little cat on an exchange beat. This just shows for the solution you have an exchange on into the solution and back onto the particle maybe another particle and this is the Z B K. Model. OK So actually we were really. Thrilled that we got both this quantum sensing type transition and the current moto. Like transition in this chemical system so if we look at a high exchange rate say three were several seconds we go along in the steady state and then suddenly it's like a first order transition we suddenly have full blown amplitude full amplitude oscillations this is the amplitude Max amplitude of the oscillation on the other hand if we take a small exchange rate point three or so it's just this gradual synchronization I say crime or to like because her moto studied phase off the leaders and this is anything but a face off later if we look at the other way and her number density constant say eighty two hundred then we see this true this line like so so this is kind of an increasing career MOTOS synchronization on the other hand if we. Look at forty two hundred we have the. Transition and then suddenly the the. Quantum sensing transition and I show that again here these are the true. Transitions this is Quorum sensing and this is Coronato and now this. One where we hold number density constant this is increasing synchronization like term auto and so it would be going. This is exchange rate here and so we're stepping up exchange rate and then suddenly we fall off this like first order transition here there are experiments and we have this noisy signal because it's all out of phase also later and then it starts getting in phase and then suddenly it goes to the steady state. Like what you can you can look at I'm sorry that this goes the opposite direction but these are the individual oscillators with the oxidized metal catalyst all out of phase giving you a flat signal oscillations in phase and then popping down to the to the steady state and the corresponding frequency distributions so I guess. What I'd like to. Leave you with on this in this study is that. This kind of tells us you know if you believe that. You saw that oscillating because you've stopped catabolism you're looking at the solitary glycolysis if you believe it's an oscillator then it should also show all type transitions if the parameter ranges accessible and so even though the Copenhagen study showed that it was this type of transition this quantum sensing transition you should probably also see this and you should probably also see this in all of these corm sensing transitions you probably also see chromo transitions if the parameter range is accessible and so I guess. The bottom line for. For me anyway is that I I think that studying this chemical system where your state variables are just simple concentrations your. Governing equations or so are well established kinetics and transport and then the experiments are very straightforward allows you to do experiments to give insights into biological behavior that's very similar and I think that this is a case where we really can say that we have provided some insights that weren't weren't available before. So we can also look at this system as a spatial temporal system in some sense this is more like the actually bacteria experiment the last one was very much like the yeast system but that's more like a bacteria experiment because they grow more or less two dimensional usually on surfaces and I'll show you the experiments and our interpretation behind these behaviors. So we start with in this says system we don't store the solution we simply use these same. Loaded catalyst loaded beads and we mix up the solution so that it's in the excitable steady state all right and this is actually a movie but it's not very interesting because it does nothing. It's in the study state. But if we now also bring up these B. before in this setting we always only only look at these oscillators that are two at least three to three diameters apart because we don't want to look at the diffuse of coupling. In the steady state but then we bring them up basically in contact and they have. A diffusive coupling and so we bring up fifty of them and nothing happens and we deliberately I think it's was we thought it was kind of nice to make it look a little bit like the bacteria colony you don't need them in a perfect way and so you bring up sixty nothing happens you bring up seventy and then finally you bring up. Eighty eight beads and absolutely nothing is happening you bring up the eighty ninth and you suddenly see. The thing comes alive and not only that but you notice that there's not some salsa later and here causing this to happen these waves originate from completely different areas this desist in is actually just. Now become a solitary system collectively. The you know you can see fairly good phase wave. Synchronization here although the center moves around a lot we can also find spiral particles I couldn't show an example of when this the onset. When when all when all these were just in the steady state but now you know I think who do we have I don't know how many particles we have but but wait but it's the same story you bring up the last particle and you start getting a spiral behavior and there's this transition you know twenty percent of the time we would see spirals and eighty percent of the time we would see target patterns. The. Their face there's very little face synchronization here because this way. Moves all over all over the place and I'll see if I can get this going again. And so the wave tip is because it's two hundred you had a genius to get nice phase wave dynamics we can we can take a look at this system in the. Matter all and I'm sorry before we get to the model these are experiments where we're majoring is the probability that you see wave behavior as a function of the group size this is not number density This is two dimensional group and so you can see that were plotting probability as a function of the. Size of the group as well as this concentration. Brought me to a reactant that it's at high bromates more active low brain it's less active so you see these curves. After every each of these points represents about eight experiments and there's about three hundred experiments in this plot and after every single experiment my students I want young Hong separated the beads to be at least three two or three diameters apart and not we didn't find one a solitary particle and so so so it was very good evidence that it is truly a collective. Behavior here is our modeling. I think this one is thirteen by thirteen by three I think we also did twenty five twenty two by twenty two by four but we basically put a model layer of loaded. Catalyst particles in the middle and then where there it's empty that is the solution where where these chemicals the activator and the inhibitor can actually react. Here is what the. Activator looks like and the inhibitor the activator is. Let's see which is or yes the activators the blue one and the inhibitor Bromide is the red one but when we look at this probability for wave activity as a function of group size you can see that it doesn't look very much like our experiment it just you know it's a step function at some value of the group size and in addition we always had wave activity starting from the center of the group. But when we add some heterogeneity and basically what we were what we do here is yes here is the mean we make this system heterogeneous in this catalyst concentration and so you can see that as we go to. Increasing concentration of the reactant row mate the system it does look quite a bit like the experiments in addition we can look at this behavior as a function of the heterogeneity just the standard deviation of this distribution and you can see that below what three point seven or so times in minus four molar we get wave activity virtually all the time and above. Stand a standard deviation of say six times in one of four we don't see any so this this result was kind of interesting that they had originated actually suppresses the wave activity rather than supports it we have some speculation about this amplitude death and so forth but I think it's pretty speculative. OK Well let's now take a look at another couple DOS later. System. Let's go back to the Stood system like the Quorum sensing in the car moto synchronization system but let's change the chemistry a bit to a new catalyst. And what we see we focus on the current synchronization transition and instead of seeing the smooth increase in synchronization we see phase clusters and basically save face clusters or groups of oscillators in the population that also late out of phase with another group and so the basic. Global manifestation of this is that your signal that you see looks like a complex oscillation because it's a composite of these clusters and so we decided to. Take a look at this and. Yes and so here is a movie now this catalyst is different colored it's. Harder to see but with image analysis you can do still do a good job and so this is these are the oscillations with no clusters and in the next movie I show also Asians that are about half the amplitude and twice the frequency. That we would like to think our face clusters and but in fact you kind of if you're doing experiments you have to wonder whether you're watching some kind of period doubling or whatever you know you can't you have to think about how to prove that you're really looking at phase clusters so in fact the phase clusters were we started with the. Two phase clusters and after a stirring part of a. And it went to the one cluster system and on the left hand side you can see you can kind of see with your eye that this has two oscillations there's an amplitude Max and there's an amplitude Max But whereas over here it's harder to see but there's really only one solution so we take these pieces and read cut them out and we look at them and you know this is what we saw and before that the. Small amplitude oscillations are about half the size and twice the frequency of the large salacious but how do we know that their face clusters and the way that we know at least the way that we add evidence to thinking we have is to do the reconstruction of these images and we basically each dot here corresponds to one of these panels and what it tells us is that this small oscillations has only fifty percent. Of the oscillators. Reaching the maximum. And then later fifty percent or so do it again whereas in the large oscillations almost one hundred percent reach the maximum so that tells us there face clusters Well it isn't proof positive but we still can do some modeling and be convinced ourselves pretty well so we take the same model. And we look remember I would like to emphasize that these phase clusters are in a two by two queue that of one hundred thousand OSS later nonetheless. The collection the population of oscillators still finds a way to partition itself into oscillating half of the oscillators oscillate and then the other half they also letters offs. Wait PIO to face so here is our. Unsynchronized system this is a four hundred oscillator simulation this is a one hundred sample and there's no spatial meaning to this grid this is just a sample OK And this is the global signal it's flat. And if we look at the phase this is just a phase there's a linear extrapolation of the phases from peak to peak you see that they're all spread out and here is our period distribution and here are three time series for. Three different oscillators twenty six thirty and twenty three natural periods. OK We go to. A higher number density we when we were at four hundred now we're going to double the number density day eight hundred here is our sample of one hundred and now you're looking now what you see is this time series and this is really kind of you know back in the olden days when we were doing stirred tech reactors this sort of mixed mode oscillations almost the same but but they're not they're clusters face clusters of four clusters and you can see them they're not synchronized here but most of them are with a pretty. Sharp frequency period distribution. OK We advanced the number density a little bit more and now we see what looks kind of like to cluster system but in fact it's more complicated we should control that because of these kind of randomly varying amplitudes and in fact what we're seeing is a two Questor system but with a switcher and these which are. So we call them switchers are these core clusters that run into the back of one group the front of the group believes runs into the back of the other group and so you keep getting this very complex dynamics look at the the period distribution now and these individual time traces of the oscillators are very complex so there's a lot of complexity in these phase. Phase groups. Phase and so here here we show the overall picture here's unsynchronized we go to four four cluster three cluster two cluster and all synchronized in a one cluster state so I see I need to hurry up a little. So we'll turn to another couple doth later experiment. Back in two thousand and two Kermit on but talk talk published this paper about. Coupled oscillators that they coupled all come back to this in a little bit but this they coupled in what they call non-local coupling where you have strong coupling nearest neighbors weaker coupling as you go further out and weaker yet if you go further out with this kind of coupling arrangement and then in two thousand and four. Current moto show that you can also get spiral. Manifestation of this same behavior so what is it it is the coexistence of a sub population that is synchronized with another sub population that is unsynchronized in a population of oscillators that are identical and identically coupled so this seems like impossible. You know why should the Democrats lawyers that are identical. Coupled split into two populations one synchronized one on Surprised so strong in two thousand and four an Abrams Stanley Abrams. Coined this state because of course mirrors or this Greek mythological creature that are in Congress you know should not exist together kind of like synchronized and unsynchronized oscillators and of course spoke at. Many. Studies on this state so we thought we should look at these because. Then I need sperm and examples I should mention the Roy who is just here I think not long ago he also decided to look at these systems in Maryland and we kind of work together on on making sure that we both got. Way to say what we found and. And so. I thought I don't think I need to spend too much time on this basically the way we couple the also leaders in the system is that we look at each oscillator we major The transmitted light intensity and then we major an oscillator it's coupled to its transmitted light intensity we take the difference of this light intensity the two light intensity is multiplied by a coupling constant and then shine light at four hundred sixty nanometers that causes this chemical reaction to occur and generate the auto catalyst and that's that's basic basically it in a nutshell this is just the B.Z. the blue Soft have intense chemistry and the auto catalyst H.B.R. O two is the fundamental thing that drives it. OK here is a model by Danny Abrams and Steve Strogatz and another. Students that. As opposed to having coupling that fast off from strong to weak kind of exponentially they wanted to take this simplest version of this namely strong coupling for group one. Oscillators toss leaders from group one strong coupling for oscillators toss players and group two but weaker coupling for Also leaders and group want to group to and vice versa so this kind of like a two step non-local coupling strong up of strong coupling of your local group weaker coupling to a distant group and the reason they did that is because they could solve it analytically but that's what we decided to start on and and this shows our experiment. We basically monitor as I said each of these last letters with a camera and then we take the difference of the oscillator eye that we're looking at and then we get the mean. Intensity for all of the oscillators in the system we use a time delay here that we can talk about later if anyone is interested and then we have a this is the end trial coupling and this is the in group coupling and that's basically the Abrams the Abrams model and here's what we find. You know a low. A particular I think that we're doing this as a function. Of delay time but this is the simplest behavior that we see we have forty oscillators it's in there in Group A. Group B. And here is Group A always synchronized and Group B. also late you know Pi out of phase more or less. Then we can also have face clusters Here's group a here are also leaders into clusters in Group B. you can see they're not there not to like one hundred twenty degrees out of phase because this is a relaxation oscillator and this is the kind here this is group a Also synchronized and this is group B. unsynchronized And then finally we found this rather odd behavior that is not still not characterized very well that we called semi synchronized and we think now that it's basically trance in phase clusters bunching up and but but I should qualify this experimental observation in the sense that we indeed have all twenty all slayers here Adenike we coupled to each other in the twenty all Slater's over here coupled to them and vice versa but the oscillators are not identical the oscillators have a. Frequency distribution so it's not it's not exactly the mathematical curiosity of that term OTOH discovered and. Many other theory theoretical works have been carried out on but it's still quite a dramatic example because they're done a quick coupled. There are some other interesting things even though these are red and blue there are these through the Group B. And here we see Group A As always thank Here is a long lived this is the mean signal of these unsynchronized toss letters this is the kind near the collapses after some you know twenty minutes and becomes. Phase synchronized with Group A And so they have a for. Night life time and here we see the life time as a function of the standard deviation of the frequency distribution and you can see that there looks like there is an asymptotic asymptotically stable came nearer but you never can tell by you know with numerics but it fails off and I think one thing that this says is that heterogeneity in this case actually makes it less likely to see a kind of mirror state rather than more likely. OK So this is the kind of thing more than a mathematical curiosity and you know what what might it be good for well some people have suggested that it could be relevant to uni hemispheric sleep I think Steve Strogatz suggested this. You know at uni hemispheric sleep occurs in mammals that need to come up for air because they've got to get some sleep but they also have to know how to come up for air also there are lots of these migratory birds need to get some rest and also many animals of prey and and so this seal is keeping one eye out open for this shark and so one hemisphere of the brain is in this very slow wave. Sleep. Mode and you have minimal Assoc Colin release the other hemisphere is like the Awake mode and with maximal as a tool Colin released. It's probably OK fact some way it's not the greatest paradigm because I think that we know that. Synchronized behaviors a little bit pathological in the brain and probably. Completely and synchronise behavior doesn't exist and so but but it does uni hemispheric sleep in the sense that you have two states that really shouldn't co-exist I think in that in that way it's of fine metaphor. So now let's look at this original chrome auto. System you know where where this coupling strength falls off exponentially because you have this coupling constant K. with this Kappa in an exponent in the exponent and basically this is a D. K. constant So at high cap the system decays rapidly and the coupling radius is very small for low Kappa it goes very far and you have a long range coupling So this cap is a very critical parameter we're going to do experiments just exactly as I described for the two groups system except now we're going to have forty oscillators in a ring so that we have periodic boundary conditions and don't have to worry about the boundary. And so this is actually a simulation of homogeneous B.Z. oscillators which we can't do in the lab yet but we can do on the computer and this is what you saw when you the opening slide and I really like it because to me it's a much more intuitive way of thinking about chi Mirah then then all the other descriptions basically you have a random distribution of phase distribution and what happens is you have accidental correlations and you can probably see some here and they start firing together these. Oscillators are close in phase when they fire together they there twice is powerful you know two is twice as strong as one in the terms of the signal and then three four etc. Until it finally reaches an asymptotic state like this and so I think that's a much more intuitive way of thinking of the kind Mirah. Here is the heterogeneous oscillator that is has a heterogeneity that's very much like the heterogeneity we would have in experiments this is the initial random phase distribution in this is the final state of course this could be in the middle because it's periodic boundary conditions. Here is the system we just looked at these are the phases so here are the synchronized phases here is a. Little cool order parameter that's like the Carmel to order parameter but you just a sample. Off letters to the right and to the left with any phase with any sampling radius and you can see for me I find these. Little spatulas of trance in order I think more interesting than the disorder because they're they're trying to they're telling us you know they're telling us things and I think that will get to that this is doesn't look like a very dramatic slide but it's very important it shows the probability of finding a completely do synchronize state I can mirror state or completely synchronized state as a function of this DK constant that determines the length of the range of coupling so at a high Kappa we have all the synchronized oscillators at a low Kapil we have mostly synchronized oscillators but at point three and point four We have both these synchronized and synchronized here's the surprise come here and synchronized this is very important if you're studying a system with heterogeneous oscillators because if you are. Studying heterogeneous oscillators and you don't see coexistence with a synchronized state you can't be sure that you're seeing a real crime here or you could be looking at a distribution that's want to ride and the tails are on synchronized you know it's not in the in trainmen zone and you think you have a kind of Europe but you don't and so it's very important to see this coexistence. These are experimental results in our experiment we have these phase waves that I think are also quite interesting here are here is this what we just saw this phase wave here are the faces of the second eyes heart and the phase which right here and you can see in this local order parameter high order the face waves don't show up with high order because the order parameter isn't meant to show high water there but it collapses into an anti phase oscillation right here and so and these are just the period at two different times and we'll take a better look at period in a moment. Here are more of these phase waves. They're kind of right they have the theorists have studied a lot of splays states these are not really splay States because they don't go from zero to two PIII even. Phase differences but but you can see that this this phase wave goes here and this one comes down here through the periodic boundary to here and so they are that is order. There we also see phase clusters here are two phase clusters in phase Here's one out of phase these are experiments here and the simulations here. OK Here here we take a look at period and we could look at frequency as well but here is. Here is are our zero to two Pif A's and our synchronized region this is heterogeneous oscillators and you can see that the period starts bouncing around. The region of synchronization meets the region of an synchronization there's kind of this frustration and that's what that's what really makes the kind mirror in my eye now if you're look at the theory papers and all of phase oscillators that's this abuse beautiful smooth curve of the frequency on follow up but of course we don't we don't have that in the chemical system here we look at the homogeneous by the way we're running the five times faster so we can accumulate periods over here and you can see that you know some of these unsynchronized also later as that were due to the initial random phase distribution really don't do much they kind of keep the same phase it's only the ones that are kind of in this frustrated zone that really have this dynamics that reminds you of chaotic Diane am except OK I'm just about ready to finish up here we see also clusters you know here's a one class or state that spontaneously gives a to sequester state through Questers and friend clusters finally. We can see. A system that has one clusters two clusters through clusters four and then when you get to the five cluster state it starts drifting so this is all unchartered territory we are trying to wrap up into some sort of paper and you one can as I mentioned before Carmel told showed in two thousand and four that you can see the kind mirror in two dimensions and then two dimensions this is this is local local order parameter the. Sure of the. Springtime euro is made up of unsynchronized off Slater's the spiral wave of course is synchronized in the sense that it's phase wave synchronized And so what you see is this this is the local minimum in the order parameter and you can see this. Spiral wave kind of wandering around with broad me and. Dynamics you very this delay and you see there a different behavior this crazy looping behavior and you also see that this spiral start looking differently and you would never see this in a direct action shouldn't say never because maybe you have seen it but but it would be unusual to see in a continuous medium and so you this big loops. And you see that here here there's the Brownian Here are the loops and here's the difference in the spirals but you find that on changing this TOWIE even further you have instability in this spiral core and this is what we're trying to work on now and you can see that you know I you can see these fleeting patches of order and you know that this is that it to have one of these regions break apart you have to have synchronization going through the metal and so I think there's a lot of tremendous amount to learn on these spiral kind Mira's and all stopped by just letting this movie play this is simply the order parameter of the last slide speeded up so thank you for your attention. Would you just. Explain. It. All right it's right there each one. This is this is for the spontaneous wave for storm something. We have not done it in one day. That that could that would be interesting to do it in one day but we've only done it in two D.. Our our modeling kind of indicates that the these Fontayne and cooperative behavior that you see is due to basically it's the last rate of the catalyst it is decreases with increasing systems size and so the one D. might be might be problematic but it might be interesting. Three D. I'm sure yeah yeah I like that. That's right I think it would yeah you could do I think three D.. With respect. But. This is. The busiest one hundred times easier to work with than any other solitary reaction that from my experience you know it's just it's just so easy I'm. And you can make you know you make an opening you can make it open system very easily because it takes a very minimal flow of reactants because the reaction is so slow and like brigs Rosher has bubbles and and it's yeah and so to be easy it's really it's a it's it's just so easy compared to other a solitary reactions. Well just think you know OK.