This is.

This is.

Right.

More about this

and then we're

here for a while

so I was just not really
that story is the prices

were one of them inspired to think

about this right we're going to start.

It's very loud very just

so no questions till after
everyone's finished.

OK All right so

we are our

task was to introduce everyone to

the objectives of this class sixteen
class sessions three hours of peace.

It was hard to the still globalisation and
twenty minutes but we get our butts and

our approach was to approach this task the
way we approached the last which was by

dividing it into our seven
learning objectives.

So without further the first
learning outcome first learning

outcome was to understand interlacing just
when the concept of globalisation and

citizenship sought to
define globalization.

There are many competing and

calm complimentary
definitions of globalization.

Sections of globalisation whether
it's cultural globalization economic

integration.

We looked at all of them.

The three main conflicts that were
the conflict between globalization

versus Americanization
globalization is often

conflated with Americanization
since the end of World War two.

American culture has been
consumed across the globe and

free market you can economics and
liberal democracies have also

been adopted across the globe another
conflict was the nation state versus

the ideal in the end this is
a more recent revelation and

is particularly prevalent in Europe but
as political power has shifted

upwards it is now being concentrated into

organizations that are above
the nation state which are these

intergovernmental intergovernmental
organizations and non-governmental or.

Three competing ideas.

Ideologies of globalization you look
at where those shadow Anderson sausage

shadow of the news of the dual dynamic
of globalization and to the citizenship.

Anderson presented the notion of imagine
communities that barriers are created and

can be broken down and Sausan presented
the notion that everybody repositioning

citizenship week in relationship
between the state and the people.

It's going to come with

the analyzing the effects
it is impossible.

It's only its own.

The premise for this is you have to
understand people citizenship is it

because there are people with civil
citizenship existing people who will say

that it's not actually a real
concept it's not to me

the interplay between those two it's all
the same lies and it is looking elsewhere

that cosmopolitanism the idea of the world
citizens or somebody who is a citizen of

the global community
is the more the school

thought the more bills to support
citizenship and turn this of this kind of

into this is that it means that we're you
know part of our communities and Terry.

And we're more separate and
it's kind of divisive.

I mean it's kind of I think it's going to
editorialize he admits it was divisive

on his uteri but it's just a way
that we looked at the same possible

solution is the one that supports
the human is really just citizenship

is just deals with that piece but more
than that from most of the reporters like

Dr King to do these interviews discusses
how there are different areas of

humanities in the study in general social
science data science and humanities that

kind of reflect the same embody
the same conflicts between

communitarianism because of all of this
is that you see in Google's citizenship.

That is that we see these different
people in each of these different

areas of study that don't necessarily
collaborative work or work together.

They'd rather kind of be more
separated and divided and

communitarian where we probably ought to
kind of period suggested by these two

authors is that we should work
together in order to explore.

Well suppose it's just sort
of a part of your face.

I think that each author has told us what
we can do with this similar drives in

your talents.

This is one way in which you get to
that there is rather communitarianism

of a pulse is reflected in other
areas of this divine forces.

This is a definition of attention so

the only possible society should

articulate that is that society
decides what is a good thing to do.

That's important because the implication
is that one city or one culture

can decide what its people should do and
that may be different in other cities or

public polls and
it's just that a person who's primary

just would have a different
more supersedes that of their

so it's more involved with what is
the right thing to do around the world.

So this is kind of a moral I'm an accident

morally with the topic here that it
doesn't really matter where you're from.

That's what this offensive is and
also it's kind

of expected.

More to

give an account of all it's
more that your history.

Looks like this it's like this.

This is about immigration.

This is one of the three of the issues.

It's very telling.

So this is the bit about immigration.

There is a serious side which says
that immigrants who are committed

you know the problems of Europe and

the causes of the borders are kind of

like sand not really physical and
not really as big of a deal as

we'd like to see a lot of you
know that is a really small.

OK Let's talk about how

this kind of traditional

concept from the

Right right right

right yes.

Aargh.

Which are

very very

common

or.

It's analyzed and how they've worked and

whether that's actually whether
their activities are actually

good from this presentation by
large organizations to promote

generally higher education etc for
their own interests specifically

I can think it would be working for
its objectives

or for
example certain economic liberalization or

the work they do it looks like

this deals with immigration and how almost

a paradox I want to call it hurts

more paradoxical aspects of
European immigration law so

that you might begin to think this is
kind of what I expected from a puzzle for

the crux

of the paradox here is that you have
on the one hand the International Order

of the kind of power to higher
authority the discovery people.

That's exactly the kind of had a look
at and this is kind of this is a start.

This is a government in which people from
different racial background now expect.

Protection

is this.

It's a kind of criticism

of the goals

and I think our concepts very

freely before understanding it's

accepted definition understanding
their relationship.

OK OK OK

So very

very constructive.