Hearing departure from the regular rector of the Center for your undergraduate university from Cal Perry also Cal Tech research materials because we're going to number research President Sarkozy engineers from that afternoon to thank you. Organizers for inviting you for this presentation and today I will focus on some of the work we have been doing in the last few years in the development up. So the caƱada for tonic of structures for the lab on chip sensing and this is the list of people who have contributed to this to this work. So I got a quick introduction to motivation. Based devices are useful for lab on chip applications and then address some of the major challenges. Is that we have in such sensing modules and then focused mainly on two technologies we have developed to address those challenges that are high Q silicon micro this present a Taurus and Altro very compact on chip or spectrometers using for tonic crystals. This cartoon shows the general platform for a lab on chip sensing module using optical tools light from a basic guide interact with the molecules to be sensed here in this interaction region and then the output of this region is monitored by the onto the spectrometer and the reason is we usually use a spectral features for detection of desired molecules and also finding the concentrations. So we need then to look at the spectral features of the transmitter light in order to see the signatures are valid. We are looking for and then there is always a delivery region which in most cases is a microfluidic Channel and of course after the spectroscopy we can have detector array and electronics on chip so that would be a system that does the detection analysis and processing on a single separate cunt chip which might be in the order of a few millimeters in size. So there are a lot of applications for such devices bias and think and Health Sciences is one of the major ones and of course environmental fencing and bio and chemical detection Homeland Security that type of thing. If you look at the challenges that exist in making very many H. or devices. Well we need certainly a high sensitivity when we shrink the size of the device in the hope of reducing. Amount of a specimen needed. We need to have a very sensitive light matter interaction to be able to detect the presence of the molecule while the concentration is very low and therefore this can be transcribed into a strong light matter interaction which could be enabled by having a very high intensity is of light interacting with some molecules the system has to have various small size in general and also we need to have a non cheaper spectrometer in order to reduce the size of the system and I won't have him back here spectrometers next to the very thing girl chip that defeats the purpose then we need to have a coating a structure that kind of attaches to the molecules of interest. So we have kind of true domains Wunderman is the optical domain but the device is designed and fabricated on solar car and then the second the main is like the approach we choose for attaching the molecules to the surface deliver is usually easy using microfluidic channel but then we need to develop surface coatings that allow us to kind of trap the molecule of interest. Well other molecules that exist in that fluidic channel are not attached to the system and also the sample very very Macon is them having it compact and reliable would would be another challenge to solve. These challenges from the level of difficulty one of the thing is this high sensitivity systems that we are developing cultural high I.Q. resonators to address and the girl is by high I.Q. resonators we will enhance the field into. And city and as a result we will increase the concentration without increasing the size and then on cheaper spectrometers there was another challenge. There's extensive knowledge for the coatings but still there is need for that and also the sample delivery man mechanism is probably the least problematic area because there's a lot of effort in the area of microfluidics using. Some of the fog of fear and the need here is probably minimal considering to the amount of work that has done in this area. So. In the rest of the tug hour we'll talk about these two important challenges and the solution to address those challenges. If you look at optical resonate horse and Chip. We usually have a structure that is in the form of a desk or a ring and then the electromagnetic energy kind of circlets out that in the so called Whispering Gallery mouth. This is very useful because usually even you have a long propagation length and in this length of propagation you have interaction with the molecules you kind of accumulate the signature of the molecule over that length. So if you can kind of wrap the length of propagation around the same pair if you're really then you will have had effectively large propagation lengths without having a large size so that's the main advantage of despair in gallery modes and these resonators at high key you have two major property. One is they have a long photon lifetime meaning that a photon can travel propagate many times around this this before being dissipated. Or transmitted into a waveguide next to that and the second one is the field in hand spend the higher the quality factor. The higher is the field intensity and therefore we are kind of using two things to increase the sensitivity. One is using the huge intensity of the field that increases light matter interaction and to having an effect of little log length. By wrapping around the same volume. So there are lots of applications for high I.Q. resonate towards including the optical signal processing sense in which is the concept of the star and also a non-linear optics and cavity Q.E.D. Which one way or the other use the high field intensity. And also the long term lifetime. So in this way you if I have a resume ter coupled to a wave guide then the mode of the resonate or will talk to the wave cried mode and if my light has a frequency at the mode of the resonator that frequency is dropped from the wave guide into the resonator. If something attaches to the surface of the resonate or the index of refraction changes the resonance frequency changes and then by monitoring the output the spectrum. I see a shift in the in the resonance and therefore I know that something has attached to the surface after resonator so that allows us to have a very compact and high sensitivity structure. So let me give you an overview of the type of high I.Q. resonators that have been a study in silicon and related to silicon Metairie all of their work or to use are still up ten in silly car micro toroid devices at Celtic. These resonate tours are flooded in silicon dioxide and. Therefore they can not be use in silicon based platforms. They cannot also be connected to the waveguide they usually bring a tape fiber next to this resonate or talk to that. So it has its own application but not suitable for the lab and chip or structures. Then there has been a lot of recent work in photonic Crystal resonators where head for structure over the period of time to Crystal is changing from one side to the other has been designed to get to cues in the order of a few millions. In principle this is appropriate for lab on chip the main problem is if you run a couple this resonator into a waveguide then you have to remove one row of these holes and therefore you cannot put your waveguide at any arbitrary distance to this resonator you have to bury the pair you do city of the structure. Therefore you cannot have the optimal coupling of the two and that usually cause problems when you want to have a strong coupling. Then going back to discuss structures in solar current this is the architecture of an undercut this. This is Silicon desk then it used to be silicon dioxide here. That is under cart and then everything is on top of silicon substrate and the reason this undercutting was done because it was believed that the silicon dioxide here reduces the Q. and by undercutting cues in the order of a few million where at Cheve. Again the problem here is when you undercut your a structure you're going to undercut the surrounding then you can not have the waveguide easily coupled into this. So you have to use outside fibers to couple light into and out of these a structure and for lab and ship our play cation it is not appropriate. But the still it has its own applications in the others. I mean it's like quantum computing and quantum processing their idea of our structure is this where a waveguide and a resonator are chip. Well talk to each other and then that wave grad will take the light into the next stage but then the problem is in a couple of years ago the best use reported there in the order of ten to the five hundred thousand and there was a big belief that well the reason that you get such a low Q. is because silicon dioxide causes linkage of light from silicon into the bottom substrate and therefore you have to live with that. So we did a lot a lot of investigation on the role of the silicon dioxide so this is a typical silicon on insulator platform or S.O.I. substrate that those of you who work in commune room are probably aware of the idea here is if you leave this oxide underneath solar car it has lots of advantages. First of all it allows you to have a lab on chip platform. Secondly it improves the heat sink properties. So if you have a high intensity light you generate heat in here and then if it is silicon dioxide it's much easier to dip dissipate compared to the case when you undercut it and there is air in here. It's also possible to integrate with other elements up on chip and then you can also add active elements to that like a mass transit store by using so-called pedestal best where you are allow a very thin layer of silicon to remain for just don't ping to make a P. and junction and it's also robust. So we did a lot of investigation to see what this does to the Q Of the resonator kind of to work against. A common belief in the field and then we notice that if you remove all the imperfections assume everything else is perfect perfect fabrication and no surface a story perfect substrate the only reason for reducing Q. is the existence of silicon dioxide then Q.'s should be in the order of ten to twelve which is not the case certainly so we can clue that that despite all the belief in the field the existence of silicon dioxide was not the main reason for low kill and the low key class primarily by the fabrication imperfection. So we spent a lot of time to clean up optimize a fabrication process that in essence is just a routine fabrication processes so you start with the silicon on insulator platform you add a layer of thin thermal silicon dioxide. Then you add an electron beam resists you do electron beam lithography and then you transfer despair into silicon dioxide using plants Maya chain and remove that electron beam resist kind of making the heart mass for etching solar car and then you add silicon to make your structure. So this is a typical baby guide coupled to a disgrace on a tour we develop and we got very good surface quality and air traffic this by working a lot on optimizing the properties of the fabrication. So fabricated the structures that characterize in a very simple system again we have a swept laser system that covers a wide range of wavelengths in the infrared and then we have light coming into the waveguide and then going out into a detector and then we added all kind of the Martin techniques in order to minimize the noise effect. So this is a typical output you get transmission. From this vague guide as a function of wavelength and each one of these Depp's represent a cavity mountain. And then if you investigate some of these modes by looking at the band width and then dividing it to the center frequency be very able to obtain cues in the order of a few millions something that proves our assumption was correct that you could still keep the silicon dioxide and then be guarded very repeatable even many a structure is different. Fabrication trials different structures in the same chip and also for the first few radial modes of the structure so that was a big kind of change in the pace of. Efforts for high I.Q. resume two hours. Then we worked up to my eyes in the couple and after the light from way got into the resonator because for sensing application the existence of a high I.Q. resonator by itself is not enough we should be able to send light from waveguide Our it to propagate a lot of round trips and then come back so that in this process we monitor what was on the surface after after resonator. So if we look at the depth of these develops. We will see different transmission reduction from a few D.B. reduction all the way to twenty five D.B. reduction and the higher the higher the reduction. I mean the better the coupling is or the more light getting into the resonator. In theory of a guy cavity coupling there are two quality factors defined Ron is the intrinsic quality factor or cues zero after resonator this is the quality factor defined by the in clinical losses losses due to surface a state due to a scattering and this and that and then the other one is. Q.C. order the coupling key to the losses that are the useful losses which is losses because of coupling into the waveguide and the optimal coupling occurs when the loss after after resonator is equal to the rate of signal coming from a right into the resonator So if these two rates are equal then you have one hundred percent transmission of power from waveguide into the resonator It's called Critical coupling. Well here we are able to get critical coupling but not refer are the lowest order mode of the resonator that is of interest. So we have to investigate in detail what was the reason for that. And by looking at the formal offer couple inquire fish and. Which are you don't like to get into too much detail of its merits but at least giving you the idea that couple in question depends on the field intensity is after two a structure waveguide and resonator and then the phase mismatch between the two restructures if you look at the most of these are structures. Each one of them has a propagation constant or beta for the wave guide and for the resonator if these two betas are the same because if not then the phase mismatch will result into a washout of the copulating So in order to monitor the phase match. We looked at the effect to be in their switches this beta divided by zero propagation can stand as a function of They've length for different resonator modes and compared it with the waveguide. So as you see for this disk of twenty Micron diameter. Twenty. My current radius the first and second most of the rest. They try to have a considerably higher value of propagation constant than the waveguide known and as a result the phase mismatch is high. The couple in between these two modes are not good and therefore Q. are coupling as a function of different distance between the two is always very high. It's like ten millions forty millions and if the intrinsic use to millions. It's killing her that you cannot couple all of the energy here. But if you look at the third you'll see that the Q. is the lowest which means here because of the phase matching you get better couple and better coupling means lower Q. and then you can get critical coupling here of end intrinsic Q. is about two million as well so to solve this problem. We need to work with the phasing One idea is to change the disk radius ten micron same waveguide couples to the second order not much better shown here. And therefore there is a systematic way of designing business structures by playing with two paramilitaries disk diameter and also the distance between waveguide and the resonator So now we are able to achieve critical couple into any mode of interest. There was another resonator structure we also develop where we keep a pedestal of very thin sixteen nanometer solar car next to the resonator and the reason we do that is in first of all it gives us a better heat sinking property and secondly it allows us to kind of doping with Peor and materials to have active control of the resonator. So again for this a structure we have a lot of modes as observed in here and then these modes have choose again in the order of a few a few millions. In designing these are structures high intensity applications like sensing in a linear quantum one issue that always exists is we work with high intensity is we want to have high sensitivity and that usually causes thermal issues. So in principle if you look at resonator and then you solve the heat transfer problem you will see that when you increase the optical power coming into the resonator the heat generation will go up and that starts to change the residence property of the resonator because the temperature change will change the index of refraction of solar can through the thermal optic effect and therefore that changes the resonance of the structure. So it's just taking it aphorisms and then it cools down and it takes it back into the resonance and eventually if you don't do anything to solve the terminal issues. You will go into instability region. Meaning that temperature changes changes index enough to brings you off resonance the light doesn't go into the waveguide and then it cools doll it gets back to the resonance and this repeats. So in order to solve this problem. Meaning that allowing us to operate at higher and higher intensities we need to look at the temperature distribution as shown all are here and the main issue is the temperature is the highest where the intensity of the field is the highest. And this curve shows part of or inside the resonator divided by the thermal conductivity of the structure and this is the cue up the resonator that as you see we can only operate in this region. Otherwise our resonance across start to deviate from their original resonance because of the change in temperature. So the first message here is if you want to get to higher and. Partner role keeping everything else. You need to increase the turmoil conductivity of the structure as much as you ten. And if you look at the kind of the properties of the undercut structure as the existing the structure before we start this research and the discussion substrate to there the format with the pedestal Venti is nonzero or the conventional one mentee is. We will see that this is a structure has considerable advantage over the undercut the structure. It is shown over here. So what we did here is we monitored the temperature inside the structure at each different intensity and the normalized everything to the temperature raise here. So this is the normalize Delta T.-Max which means the maximum change in temperature inside the structure divided by the maximum change in temperature in that undercut structure and as you observed. When T. is equal to zero which means conventional their skin. We will get depending on whether we put our on this top or oxide to increase Q. we will get at least a factor two and a half improvement in the thermal attack and if we allow a Peristyle of fifty nanometer exist then we can get a factor for improvement in the intensity of the structure. Now a factor of four in intensity means huge factor in the linear effect because now linear effect very good some power off the intensity. So this this is one of the major areas that these structures are better than the existing ones and now we are working on reducing the thickness of silicon dioxide from the convent Chanel. And all the way to the limit that you will just barely be limited by silicon dioxide and then by reducing this thickness. You will increase the thermal conductivity so you still can use it at higher values of power. So I think that summarizes the fact that now we can repeatedly design a structure this Cuse in the order of a few million with high temperature stability allowing us to have huge light intensity is and that is mostly enough for our right mater interaction the other challenging thing is our outward compact on cheap spectrometers using for tonic crystals as a introduction into photonic crystals they are periodic structures in the dielectric material as shown here. This is a C.M. of a silicon based for tonic Crystal the holes represent a periodic area of air in cellar Conn and there are two lines up in Crescent applications are photon a crystal one line is for tonic bandgap which is a range of frequencies Verno photon is our loud and rich people use this structures to make cavities waveguide lasers and into a greater optical structure. The secular line of application that is the concern here is unique dispersive properties of these are structures. So here I have shown the dispersion in the form of constant frequency contours in the propagation domain K. X. and K. right. Are the X. and Y. components of the propagation vector in two directions X. and Y. and A is the lattice constant here. So each care of shows the constant frequency contour at different values of K. just to. Remind you in a box of material a mega frequency is C. time scale speed of light times propagation constant magnitude of propagation constant so the current to Ruby a circle because K. axis crowd plus K. Y. Square is Omega square overseer Square. It's a circle. That's what we see here but these are structures are capable of a range of this person properties from bark. To very flat. To very sharp variation. And also the curvature could be positive and negative opposite sign of curvature. So it allows you to develop dispersive devices that are not possible to be developed by any kind of partner Terry are and each one of these regions that I talked about cons like flat region sharp region positive or negative region have their own application in the field of optics that I will talk a little about some of them but our focus is on wavelength separation in a very compact structure. So a device that does the veiling separation either in the form of a very lengthy multiplexer or a spectrometer in an ideal form would be a device that separates the wavelengths in a space and then the separated wave lengths propagate a minimum distance to be completely independent and then they don't deflect or increase their size inside their structure and they are also separated from the unwanted contributions a straight right unwanted paralyzation and things like that. And then in addition to that they are compact and so on and so forth and of course in the back materials you can to do that like in in a prism. You can separate colors but. You have to propagate a large distance and then the variable length distance between two edges and collars is a lot. So the fraternity crystals allow us to get very close to this ideal a structure that no balk at that area all can not. So you know to show that I'd like to introduce three. Effects in photonic crystals run is the super prism effect the sharp dependence on the wavelength. So in super prism effect valence are separated in a photon a crystal in a very dramatic fashion so this could be all the tens of microns or so and these wavelengths could be a few nanometer apart. Then the second one is the so-called negative diffraction where the diverging beam of light is brought into focus by a photon a crystal by having a negative diffraction compared to what about the material has a negative refraction is another property that they claim is available for photonic crystals that light that comes into the structure or a fact in the direction that is usually opposite from what is coming mentioned all. Well all these three things have been done in separate what we did in this research is we were able to design a structures that combine simultaneously all these three effects. So in that sense right. Comes into the structure with multiple wavelengths then different wavelengths are separated by the by the super prism effect after separation they get focused by the negative diffraction effect into a small channels and by negative refraction they are separated from a stray light so that combines all the requirements that an ideal separator needs and then at the output of this. Structure we usually use an area of They've got to sample the signal and monitor that and we usually put two channels per each way guys per each channel just to get a better idea about the crosstalk. Well we were able to prove that there are a structures that I want to have these three effects together so. The regions that are at the corner like that are the high super prism regions. Then we have the negative refraction region represented here and also negative diffraction region added to that and this for tonic Crystal was fabricated a structure like this. So we have an area of waveguides that we could use to extract a structure at different angles of incidence then we have a region of solar car that is just allowing right to propagate before getting in and this is where our photonic Cristela structure is. And we were able to demonstrate in a structure that has a hole sizes of two hundred nanometers in diameter with a period of three hundred seventy nanometer for channels eight nanometer spacing are separated with better than six point five D.B. true crosstalk isolation and about one point five D.B. non-uniformity Well this was the first ever demonstration of four channels with this much wavelength separation and the size of the structure compared to all existing run was two orders of magnitude smaller. This is structure is about seventy Micron by seventy Micron this is the photonic Crystal region and each one of these waveguide is six micron and is allowed to sample the signal in the output. So this is the actual experimental result of what we are observed at the output of these waveguides monitored by. And infrared camera as you see for each wavelength. That is designed in this plex air. We have the output of out of a rat's monitor. So for this wavelength we have to wave guys that have most intensity as designed for to correspond to each wavelength. Then the second wave length has another two wave guys and other to one another to the main thing is the two major wave grads are independent of each other or separate which means you have minimal cross start. You have separation and of course there is some cross stock as I mentioned it's the cross start production is better than six point five D.B.. Now to prove that the three effects that I talked about family tameness Li exist. We also monitored the output for the unwanted polarization for which none of these three effects were designed and the first thing we observed is for the same three for Wave variable length. First of all we see no suppression they co-exist in different bad guys so super prison effect exists here and here. Secondly the sizes of the output beams are large when they cover ten waveguide sixty Micra here we have only two wave guys so this means negative diffraction really works where and third and most importantly and these are run to contributions or occur at a set of waveguides here. That is totally different from the setup waveguides for which to run to a contribution of care is lab run going this way the other one is going that way that is because of the negative refraction. So this really shows that the idea of having the simultaneous effects works. Not only that but also we can have more degree of control by exciting the input from a different waveguide therefore having an effective angle of incidence on the a structure that is different from one another. And what happens is well wavelength and output response. The same for channel the multiplexing exist but by monitoring it at thirteen fifteen or seventeen degrees of incidence we shift the wavelength cringe of operation so we have that if we have control also present for us. Now our main goal in lab on chip is to make spectrometers not the multiplexers and it happens that for designing a spectrometer you have much more flexibility than we do multiple X. or. Well the reason is if you come with multiple Waveland channels in the Mounted plex or you want them to be completely separated you would like to allow no cross star because these are the information bearing channels and you don't run to any subscriber get information of the other one. But when you are talking about a spectrometer you really don't want to separate the spectral channels you want to estimate the strength the relative strength of each channel. So you can have some cross stock in the output. So for example here I have shown a device that does a spatial spectral mapping meaning that different lengths are mapped into a spectrum a spatial patterns like this and the only thing that I want is these patterns be diverse and nuff that I could use this as a linear system and do inverse filtering in order to get my spectrum. So all I do is I come out run wave length at the time and train my system measure my transfer function then I come with the unborn the desired unknown SEC now monitor what is in the output but since I know my transfer function. I do inverse filtering in order to get my spectrum and universal turned is usually estimation techniques like least minutes in a school and things like that. So here we have much more flexibility in designing these or spectrometers and in addition to that elaborate chip sensing I don't want a spectrometer that monitors two hundred nanometer constantly. What we want is the really kind of adaptive system that looks for a special feature. So for example in if I have a resonator coupled to a wave. I have a dip in the transmission and I want to see what happens to distributor it shifts or not the shift is what I want because the shift will tell me that resonance has changed something has attached to the surface of the resonator So I'm looking going to a special few special features after the after spectra and for that for tonic Cristela spectrometers are excellent candidates. So the idea here is very simple. I want to design a pattern detector a spectral parent detector that monitors the shift after people are in ROM on sensing monitors the presence of four or five rather than peaks that's all I want I don't want to monitor the spectrum of my signal over five hundred nanometer that's not the goal in a lab on chip sensing and therefore we may need to reconsider the design of for a structures. So this is the result of the same structure designed for a very blank do multiple lexing as an a spectrum better than the monitor this what we do is we come at each wavelength at a time monitor the output then change the wavelength Bronnie told the output in order to train our system or in order to calibrate its transfer function then we come with a single peak and try to monitor the output and then use our system to estimate the location of the pic and this is what we get estimated wavelengths Russ's the input wavelengths blue shows why. We estimated using our spectrometer and red shows the actual wave length and as you see they are very very close using the system. This is their standard deviation of our error and as you see we have about point three in detection accuracy or detection error after location after peak for a peak that is one point five five microns so it's about a factor of ten to the floor in that now we went ahead and designed the structure to be an optimal a spectrometer and not of a lengthy multiplex there and it happens that for that we don't need to have complete separation of the channels so as you see if you look at the same area of waveguides the up to mom has some overlap between different wavelength channels and as a result we were able to get a noise a relation that was much better than that it is a very lengthy estimation error as a function of noise to signal ratio and as you see for this region where the noise is thirteen below the signal. We will have ten P. commuter wavelength accuracy and fifteen and a meter band with now twenty could meter wavelength accuracy is ten to the minus eleventh and center wavelength is about ten to the minus six. So if my she might pick shifts by one in hundred thousand. I'm able to detected using the system that brings us the capability of single molecule detection. Now this is the actual performance of this structure. Again we designed it to be an optimal spectrometer not available and the multiplexer and this is what happens is that in this fifty nanometer operation range as you see. This is each line corresponds to one waveguide and each column correspond to one wavelength. The key here thing is that the variable and channels are not completely separated from each other they have overlap but if you look from here to there you will see a diverse distribution in the waveguide for the power of these waves that's all we need for the for the spectroscopy we need a diverse a special a spectral mapping this will be enough for us to measure the location of our peaks. Now the more recent get on published work we have done is to look at the higher bands of photonic crystals and this shows that constant frequency contours each number is wavelength in nanometer and this is the prohibited range just because in this range right. Escapes from the top of the structure but by looking at the incidence at thirty degrees. We were able to get a very good response this is group for our city angle as a function of wave length the slope of this tells me that then I change my wavelength by one nanometer how much how much angle difference I have in the in the direction of propagation so I have a lambda in nanometers and the land. Plus one changes its angle and this is ten point five degrees per nanometer compared to what we had in our first demonstration that is point seven degree in a meter. That is a factor fifteen yet improvement in the performance that when you have this kind of improvement that you could divide it as you wish to the size of the structure to the resolution of the structure. It depends on what your goal is if you are if you have enough wavelength a curacy you can make your structure smaller by a factor fifteen. If the size is and a half. You can make your accuracy. Right. Better by a factor of fifteen. So this is the structure that is fabricated we need to add a buffering or stage to minimize the reflection because the group philosophy of the second band is low for a structure of the first twenty by fifteen Micron we were able to get three nanometer resolution rather than eight that we had in the past. Remember this for seventy by seventy microns so if you look at the kind of reduction in the size and reduction in wave length that shows the factor fifteen and again we are able to separate the Bay of legs successfully. And this is the spectrometer performance again for a good range of signal to noise ratio and we are again able to get ten P. commuter at thirteen D.B. signal to noise ratio. Let me just finalized by saying that now that I have these desks and I have these spectrometers then we are introducing a new concept in sense in which we call it multiplex sensing the idea is we use the same real estate and infrastructure by having a spectrometer to detect multiple species. So here I have each resonator designed at a different wavelength and coated with a different material that can attach to a different virus or molecule and then this spectrometer separates the signature of these resonator So let's say it's resonator has frequency or wavelength that is three nanometer apart. So I'm dividing my fifteen meter operation into three nanometer windows in which one of these resonators will operate. So all of them. Sure the same as spectrometer but in the output I'm able to say OK this is three nanometer for a species one species two and so on and so forth. The reason that marks and their interferometers like that are Perth for about because you could make them in the balanced form that you have to or as an a tourist. For a species. If you are fabrication there are terminal drift and things like that that will be compensated and one of them is counted one of them. So the phase difference of the two is monitored in this interferometer by the a spectrometer so all we need is in set up a laser we need an L E V And then we can have this wavelength division multiplexing sensing rather than optical transmission that you around. There are and as a result these two technologies are able to after a structures that would be at most including all the analysis in the range of a millimeter on a side that are able to detect a hundred different species with the accuracy of a single molecule detection. So that's a very attractive solution for lots of applications hand health and stores. Probably Top care detection of infectious diseases detection of explosive and so on and so forth. So in conclusion. Silicon photonics has a lot to offer because of the unique properties it has for designing different up to call devices that could be called Naked in the firm off and on chips or stem with the addition of advantages of available fabrication tools because of CMOS technology and relatively low cost of the substrate we could get very high Q. resonators in silicon that facilitates the light matter interaction for all to our sensitive sensing and then by using photon a crystal we get very accurate detection spectrometers that could operate in the right range of a plank with a very good accuracy and then by combining. And adding the coding and delivery their invasion in having very compact lab on chip sensors that could hopefully revolutionize the. The kind of the sensing market. Thank you very much for the attention. I am. So the first question is right. Sensing mechanisms have been in the region we ourselves are looking into something called multi-modal sensing. So we are looking into three modalities of sensing implemented on the same chip. I explained in this talk is in that sense think so. The sensing is done by monitoring the index of refraction on top of the after resonator when you change the index of refraction the resonance frequency of the resonator changes since it's a very sensitive resonator the shift of one pair of hundred thousand is enough to be detected because it's a very sharp sharp peak. You could envision things like fluorescent sensing than the molecule that attaches to the surface is pumped up the crowd beam and then it's fluoresce and then you have mechanisms to grab a good portion of fluorescent into the waveguide and monitor that that would be useful for biomolecules and then the third one would be surface enhanced ROM and sensing where you pump your signal on top and I'm sorry the molecule on top of the resonator using the rest. And then you get the ram on signal back into the resonator and into the waveguide for processing the second thing that you ask is What are the mechanisms that can change the resonance frequency of the structure. Well of course the first thing is the radius of this desk which is done during the design. Number two is the index of refraction after the center after this. And it's Perry ferry within a few tens of nanometer because the mode usually dies out very quickly. So if something attaches to the surface in that Perry ferry then you're able to get the change in the effect of index by changing the center of the. The residence the next effect is the thermal effect so if you change the temperature that changes the index of refraction again and that change will change as there wasn't a big change or resonance frequency in the next one is the free carriers. So if you inject carriers electrons or holes into a cell or can that kind of acts as a conduct levity and that changes the index of refraction again and that changes the resonance frequency of the structure. So all these mechanisms that have been studied. Well one way or the other change the index of refraction and people used for example injection of carrier to modulator signal. So you are passing light from a wave guide next to a cavity and then you change the resonance frequency to be on resonance and off resonance and therefore light propagates but doesn't propagate so you have bits of ones and zeros and they have demonstrated sixteen gigabit per second modulator using that effect. But these are the main mechanism that change in the Excel for a fraction. Yes well. If you would like to censor our food is there yes it does not too big a deal but it's a relatively big deal because suppose you have a carrier fluid that incorporates a very low concentration of the molecules that you have so it's going to be a rush for you through it is usually used to deliver the molecules and then it is washed and removed so at the time of sensor we don't have anything in the free channel. So basically fluid brings the molecules attached to the surface when it's rushed away the molecules are still attached to the surface because it's a bonding and then and then you have no fluid at the time of sensing. Now having said that there are ideas that people up to a fluidics are investigating to bring the fluid to module like the property after structure so for those ideas. You need to have the fluid in there. Order to make sure that you monitor it the way you run a modified their way around. And then they envision all these kinds of plants and combine and so that you have different fluids with different in this is combine at the right proportion to kind of marginalized the performance the way you want and sensing is just the carrier to bring the molecules for them to attach that's it it's removed at the time of since you're me remember the limit of detection after a light where the for sure we have not demonstrated the entire system yet the rocking. OK you can detect for a fraction in the order of ten to the minus seven so Delta and in the order of ten to the minus seven can be achieved but design is appropriate in principle there is hope for single molecule detection. But there is hope for single molecule detection experimentally we have not demonstrated ten to the minus seven get our exact resonance frequency. For modulator that's the problem. First of all these are disks. So these are much harder than rain and the reason is the range has the cues in the order of a few tens of thousands two hundred thousand million. So it's just a very sharp pick if you have a little arrow you're going to miss it. For communication application that's a big deal for sensing it's not a big deal because what you're looking for is not an exact frequency looking at the frequency shift. No matter what your fabric you get close to what you want but the thing that defines the sensing is just a shift in the location of the pic but the exact location of the pic and the exact location is monitored at the time of kind of training the system I tell. Rating the system but then when you look at the shift if you choose the chip. That that is not a big issue and sends it back for optical communication and signal processing. That's a major issue and in order to fix the center of your resonance. Then you need to implement some feedback mechanism like a thermal terminal signal just apply some temperature change in order to change the index to just bring it exactly to the place that you want. Yes. Critically on a meter the best that you have demonstrated is fifteen and a meter and the reason is you need to have super prism effect and other two updates in order to have that and fifteen and a meter is the best that we have achieved to date that we have only three effects. So as a result. These are structures are not good for wide purposes spectrometers incensing Usually the amount of shift that you're looking for is not even run nanometer is an order of meter. So for sensing there's no problem you can have multiple channels mandatory but if you're looking for just looking at their spectrum of a fluorescent object or something like that. This is not the right tool to use and exactly. Photonic crystals. If you kind of double the size of the structure it does the same job at double wavelength. So you could kind of bring the operation wavelength to any range you run but just scaling the structure. Terry out is you should not go to live lengths for with silicon has absorption so if you try to come back. Roughly nine hundred. Fifty nanometer or so when you start getting a lot of absorption from silicon and then you get structure would be ultra Lassie. But in the infrared it's possible. And just one comment I'm glad you brought the issue. You may think that this is limited to infrared but it's not because we are demonstrating the same concept invisible and near infrared using silica nitrite as the substrate which has much much smaller loss visible and are so it's possible to just choose the wavelength of operation so this is my range. Let's do it you know the thing is you have this photon a Christan let's say. Comparable to this area. I believe that's right. So if you change the entire size of everything by ten percent just operates at the same the same performance at the change by ten percent. So this is a land that zero. This is which is a feature size and again the main issue is since you just monitoring the index of a fraction the very violent up operation is defined by the structure and availability of sources and detectors not by the molecules because the molecules index doesn't change really two hundred three hundred nanometer window so that gives you the flexibility to choose the wavelength up operation in there and you want if you're working for example that fluorescent turned out to turn a different story because the fluorescent of your molecule is being monitored and if you lock in with surface enhanced ROM and you put Mattel. Like a structure and then you need to work in the wavelength that you get the surface enhanced meant for that specific metal that is mostly in the range of visible and real I.R. like eight hundred nanometers so that for index. You don't worry about the Troy stuff they've length related to the material that you want to sense. Thank you.